DodgeForum.com
DodgeForum.com Home - Dodge Marketplace - Dodge Photo Galleries - Create an Account - Dodge News

Go Back   DodgeForum.com > Dodge SUVs > Dodge Durango > 1st Gen Durango


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old 10-23-2008, 08:01 PM
andyg andyg is offline
Professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1998 DGC, 2000 Durango, 1969 GTO
Location: Niles Illinois
Posts: 125
Default

Here is a calculator to go from static to dynamic given that you know all the specs it needs.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/dynamic-cr.php
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Dodge Forums!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
  #22  
Old 10-23-2008, 09:20 PM
DRO318's Avatar
DRO318 DRO318 is offline
Captain
2000 Dodge Durango
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2000 Dodge Durango 5.2 mag
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 579
Default

This all sounds good but should the PCM be flashed to mach the new setup? or will it automatically adjust it self.
This is a valid question seeing as the compression will be larger.
After the rebuild is it best to stick with stock ignition or better off going up to MSD. I heard they make great distributors.
__________________

275/45/20s+30X9.5's for the winter, Bilstiens, Moog ball joints, Personal made front grill, Custom made ram air, Tornado, Fuel Boss, Champion spark plugs, Accel ignition coil, new GMB water pump, 180 degree Jet T-stat, rebuilt trans with shift kit, PVC enhancer!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-23-2008, 09:30 PM
andyg andyg is offline
Professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1998 DGC, 2000 Durango, 1969 GTO
Location: Niles Illinois
Posts: 125
Default

Depending on how drastic the changes you make, the computer might be fine but most likely it will throw codes all day. I would recommend that with any actual mechanical modification, get the computer re-flashed. I don't know anything about the capacity of the oem computers to know if an aftermarket ignition will be needed.

I know of people running old school distributors with extreme changes its all in your tuning abilities. Or the shops abilities where you take it.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-23-2008, 10:00 PM
DRO318's Avatar
DRO318 DRO318 is offline
Captain
2000 Dodge Durango
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2000 Dodge Durango 5.2 mag
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 579
Default

Yeah Hydra is runnin MSD on his "D"
I wonder if any of the top name Ignition Companies have made a distributor for the 5.2 and 5.9
And are there any sensors that should be changed?
__________________

275/45/20s+30X9.5's for the winter, Bilstiens, Moog ball joints, Personal made front grill, Custom made ram air, Tornado, Fuel Boss, Champion spark plugs, Accel ignition coil, new GMB water pump, 180 degree Jet T-stat, rebuilt trans with shift kit, PVC enhancer!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-23-2008, 10:35 PM
andyg andyg is offline
Professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1998 DGC, 2000 Durango, 1969 GTO
Location: Niles Illinois
Posts: 125
Default

I believe that you don't change the sensors, you change the components that interpret what the sensors tell.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-23-2008, 10:51 PM
DRO318's Avatar
DRO318 DRO318 is offline
Captain
2000 Dodge Durango
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2000 Dodge Durango 5.2 mag
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 579
Default

So your sayin don't worry about the sensors that have not been changed in 100k + miles?
__________________

275/45/20s+30X9.5's for the winter, Bilstiens, Moog ball joints, Personal made front grill, Custom made ram air, Tornado, Fuel Boss, Champion spark plugs, Accel ignition coil, new GMB water pump, 180 degree Jet T-stat, rebuilt trans with shift kit, PVC enhancer!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-24-2008, 01:46 AM
andyg andyg is offline
Professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1998 DGC, 2000 Durango, 1969 GTO
Location: Niles Illinois
Posts: 125
Default

I guess you could change them if you are very active on preventative maintenance. The ones on my D havent given issues for 171,000 miles and counting.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-24-2008, 01:18 PM
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker hydrashocker is offline
Moderator of Mayhem
Dodge Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Vehicle: Custom Built 1998 Durango 5.9L
Location: Tremonton, Utah
Posts: 5,802
Default

The OEM distributor will do fine for this mod. The only thing I would say to do different is add a MSD Blaster coil, wires, cap & rotor, and gap .001 to.002 over OEM.

If your crankshaft sensor is bad you would know it. I don't thing you would need a new one. Now if you did a rebuild, added new cam gearing, distributor gearing, then you are getting precise so you would want to do a sensor to ensure a great fire.

As for doing a full Mallory Ignition I don't think for this type of moding that it would be necessary.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelboy
bet your motor aint as big as your mouth is.

I don't take sides.....I hate everyone equally.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-24-2008, 03:09 PM
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker hydrashocker is offline
Moderator of Mayhem
Dodge Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Vehicle: Custom Built 1998 Durango 5.9L
Location: Tremonton, Utah
Posts: 5,802
Default

As for the PCM:

You would not need to flash it because the build I am talking about is close enough to specs. A performance tune would be great.

If you want a true tune for the PCM a dino would be needed for perfection. I think the SCT tuners will dino at a dealer but unshore?

Two tuners are updateable and they are the Hypertech Max and the STC.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelboy
bet your motor aint as big as your mouth is.

I don't take sides.....I hate everyone equally.

Last edited by hydrashocker; 10-24-2008 at 03:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-25-2008, 05:54 PM
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker hydrashocker is offline
Moderator of Mayhem
Dodge Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Vehicle: Custom Built 1998 Durango 5.9L
Location: Tremonton, Utah
Posts: 5,802
Default Check This Out!

I found this in this mornings Deseret Paper (Utah Rides) but could not find a link to it so I typed the artical so here it is!


The parts Dept crew recently built and tested a 5.9-leter (360-cubic inch) that made 527 horsepower at 6300 rpm using a Edelbrock Performer RPM Air Gap intake manifold (as well as a matching cylinder heads and a healthy roller camshaft. The peak horsepower and torque output (474 ft) compared with the larger 7.0-leter engine found in the benchmark Chev Corvette ZO6. It’s actually a very basic pump-gas-friendly combination (9.8:1 compression) that performed better than it did using a race-bred intake manifold in terms of peak power while delivering more torque and using less fuel in the process. What could be better? The NASCAR Edition Performer RPM Air Gap, of course, which has a smooth black finish as opposed to the usual rough cast finish. The special manifold is available for Chev, Ford, and Chrysler applications. Visit www.edelbrock.com


http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_new/mc/manifolds/chrysler/rpm_air_gap-sb.shtml


Now this is what I'm talking about here guy's and a very close match I might add! The problem here is octane I would assume.

I was far off on the compression on my motor tho so my bad.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelboy
bet your motor aint as big as your mouth is.

I don't take sides.....I hate everyone equally.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Tags
045, 38l, block, bored, camshaft, dodge, durango, engine, fluid, flush, hho, longetivty, pontiac, power, profile, steering

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0