3.9 engine swap 96-97 Problems??
#1
3.9 engine swap 96-97 Problems??
Hello dakota fans. It's time to swap out the 3.9 from my 96 4x4 dakota. She just burns too much oil. There is a nice sounding 97 3.9 motor available near to me for not too much money. What kind of nightmarish problems am I likely to have swapping a 97 3.9 into a 96 truck. I prefer to keep the 96 computer and harness if possible. Thanks for your time guys.
#2
#3
OK Thanks so a few more questions
Thanks, So I do know that the blocks are the same. I take it from your reply that you think it is pretty much a drop in deal. Did the throttle body and injectors/fuel rail change in configuration from Gen 1 to Gen 2/96 to 97? I wonder if I will have to change anything on the intake or sensors related to the throttle body. I guess you think the 97 motor will have substantially the same sensor points as the 96?
I am not thinking about the v8 swap because I am pretty mileage sensitive. I am commuting in the little thing and I do a bit of hunting as well. It is the std cab short bed 5 speed so it's pretty snappy with a v6.
Are these motors known to have any defects like cracks in the heads/oil galleys that would cause excessive oil consumption? It doesn't seem like the mileage alone would be responsible for the amount of oil it consumes. 1t's got 135,000 but uses a quart in about 300 to 400 miles. The funny thing is I don't really notice a lot of smoke. Any input is appreciated. Thanks.
I am not thinking about the v8 swap because I am pretty mileage sensitive. I am commuting in the little thing and I do a bit of hunting as well. It is the std cab short bed 5 speed so it's pretty snappy with a v6.
Are these motors known to have any defects like cracks in the heads/oil galleys that would cause excessive oil consumption? It doesn't seem like the mileage alone would be responsible for the amount of oil it consumes. 1t's got 135,000 but uses a quart in about 300 to 400 miles. The funny thing is I don't really notice a lot of smoke. Any input is appreciated. Thanks.
#4
It is pretty much identical to your 3.9L engine. I would swap the sensors just to be safe, and highly recommend you change out most of the lower end gaskets so you avoid any headaches later.
If you are losing oil and can't find it, there is a good chance you have a bad plenum gasket on your current engine. Take a peak in the intake and see if it looks like there is oil in there, if so, you may consider changing the plenum and see how it goes. It is a strong running engine and 135,000 is not a lot on it, IMO.
If you are losing oil and can't find it, there is a good chance you have a bad plenum gasket on your current engine. Take a peak in the intake and see if it looks like there is oil in there, if so, you may consider changing the plenum and see how it goes. It is a strong running engine and 135,000 is not a lot on it, IMO.
#5
Sry Cheetah been away for a couple days. In agreement with Dbilik on the swap over. Use all your old sensors and actuators. Reseal the lower end of the one youre putting in.... the OP gasket and rear main seal. You may have been sucking oil in through the belly pan gasket on the plenum. It was getting atomized so much from the vacuum, you probably wouldn't have seen any smoke.
#6
It is pretty much identical to your 3.9L engine. I would swap the sensors just to be safe, and highly recommend you change out most of the lower end gaskets so you avoid any headaches later.
If you are losing oil and can't find it, there is a good chance you have a bad plenum gasket on your current engine. Take a peak in the intake and see if it looks like there is oil in there, if so, you may consider changing the plenum and see how it goes. It is a strong running engine and 135,000 is not a lot on it, IMO.
If you are losing oil and can't find it, there is a good chance you have a bad plenum gasket on your current engine. Take a peak in the intake and see if it looks like there is oil in there, if so, you may consider changing the plenum and see how it goes. It is a strong running engine and 135,000 is not a lot on it, IMO.