Go Back   DodgeForum.com > Dodge Trucks > Dodge Dakota > 2nd Gen Dakota
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2nd Gen Dakota 1997 - 2004 Dakota's

3.92 Rear End With Magnum 3.9

Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-12-2013, 12:37 AM
Josh17 Josh17 is offline
Rookie
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Vehicle: 1985 Dodge W150 318 (sidelined due to crash) 1999 Dodge Dakota sport, Magnum 3.9 and 5-spd. (DD)
Location: Michigan
Posts: 55
Josh King loady740
Default 3.92 Rear End With Magnum 3.9

Well I have been researching for a while now, and I figured that getting a 3.92 Rear end for my 1999 2wd 3.9 Dakota would give me the best bang for the buck. I have Found one that is in my price range. Its a 4X4, 12 bolt, 9.25'' Ring gear, 3.92 ratio. I was just wondering if that would work with my 2wd 3.9. If it doesn't would any of you have any suggestions ?
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Dodge Forums!

Last edited by Josh17; 12-12-2013 at 01:39 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2013, 09:13 AM
00DakDan's Avatar
00DakDan 00DakDan is offline
Section Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Vehicle: 2000 Dak Sport CC 4.7 5 speed 4x4
Location: MA
Posts: 2,517
Default

The spring perches will be on the wrong side. The 4x4 has the springs on top, the 4x2 on the bottom.

Ratio wise it will work fine.
__________________
http://dodgeforum.com/forum/signaturepics/sigpic158370_10.gif
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2013, 11:37 AM
magnethead magnethead is online now
Champion
2001 Dodge Dakota
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Vehicle: 01 Dako 3.9 4x2
Location: Fort Worth/ARL, TX
Posts: 4,286
Send a message via AIM to magnethead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 00DakDan View Post
The spring perches will be on the wrong side. The 4x4 has the springs on top, the 4x2 on the bottom.

Ratio wise it will work fine.
and it's a 9.25 axle, too. Did the 9.25 and 8.25 use the same spring perch spacing? Not that it matters since they'd need to be cut and re-welded, or use a 4x4 leaf spring and shackles
__________________

68 Camaro (sold): 5.318@128 / 8.568@155 ; 2014 Dragster: 4.79@143 off the trailer
Magnethead494.com Web & Computer Maintenance
McDermott Family Racing
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2013, 08:03 PM
Josh17 Josh17 is offline
Rookie
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Vehicle: 1985 Dodge W150 318 (sidelined due to crash) 1999 Dodge Dakota sport, Magnum 3.9 and 5-spd. (DD)
Location: Michigan
Posts: 55
Josh King loady740
Default

Thanks for replying In that case then do you guys know where i could just get the gears and swap them ? I don't want to pay 400 dollars for an axle just for the gears.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2013, 08:29 PM
atthewmartin114 atthewmartin114 is offline
Veteran
1997 Dodge Dakota
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Vehicle: 1997 dodge dakota club cab sport
Location: New york
Posts: 392
Default

id run with the 4x4 rear end. and do and axle flip and level the truck as well as give your seld one hell of a whole shot. but its your call. also gears are pretty cheap from jeggs. installing them il go to the dealer it shouldnt be 400 or even 300 it should take like 3 maybe 4 hours to do it. if you buy them your self and dont need bearing or anything
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2013, 09:54 PM
Josh17 Josh17 is offline
Rookie
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Vehicle: 1985 Dodge W150 318 (sidelined due to crash) 1999 Dodge Dakota sport, Magnum 3.9 and 5-spd. (DD)
Location: Michigan
Posts: 55
Josh King loady740
Default

the truck is my dd, so i cant have a whole lot of down time (maybe on the weekends). What would i need to do an axle flip and to level the truck ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2013, 10:37 PM
moe7404 moe7404 is offline
Record Breaker
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,827
Default

i went to a 4.1 rear gears from 3.55s in my 01 dak 3.9 V6. BUT i only drive in town. my MPG was 8-9, with the 4.1 it went to 11-12 MPG. cause it tricked the trany into thinking it was at a higher speed. and it went in to O.D. at 30 MPH. at 35 MPH the tach is 1400 RPM. and was surprised the it had enough power to pull it. NOTE: in town driving only
__________________
moe
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2013, 11:01 PM
magnethead magnethead is online now
Champion
2001 Dodge Dakota
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Vehicle: 01 Dako 3.9 4x2
Location: Fort Worth/ARL, TX
Posts: 4,286
Send a message via AIM to magnethead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moe7404 View Post
i went to a 4.1 rear gears from 3.55s in my 01 dak 3.9 V6. BUT i only drive in town. my MPG was 8-9, with the 4.1 it went to 11-12 MPG. cause it tricked the trany into thinking it was at a higher speed. and it went in to O.D. at 30 MPH. at 35 MPH the tach is 1400 RPM. and was surprised the it had enough power to pull it. NOTE: in town driving only
basically same story as me, but you probably dont drive with a lead foot or race on weekends :P
__________________

68 Camaro (sold): 5.318@128 / 8.568@155 ; 2014 Dragster: 4.79@143 off the trailer
Magnethead494.com Web & Computer Maintenance
McDermott Family Racing
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2013, 11:36 PM
moe7404 moe7404 is offline
Record Breaker
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,827
Default

no not racing at the track, now days. but i DID have the heaviest foot you ever saw. i have never got as good of MPG as others on the same car / truck. i had a 1965 chrysler 300 L 413, single 4 bbl. not duel like most 300s, 727, 3.23 42000 lb. cast iron ext manifold. totally stock. 1/4 mile 16.08 et / 85 mph
__________________
moe
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-2013, 11:51 PM
magnethead magnethead is online now
Champion
2001 Dodge Dakota
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Vehicle: 01 Dako 3.9 4x2
Location: Fort Worth/ARL, TX
Posts: 4,286
Send a message via AIM to magnethead
Default

the 4.10's really do go well with the 3.9's though. If I didn't do any highway at all or was switching my truck out to dedicated race, I wouldn't think twice about 4.56's. A 4.30 would be the sweet spot, but they don't exist for the chrysler 8.25 or even the 9.25 that I know of. The V6's just don't have the down low torque that the V8's do, and the 4.10's make up for it.

Think of it this way. V6 (3.9L) = 75% of a V8 (5.2L). 3.55 is 78% of 4.56. So kinda/sorta by the numbers, a 4.56'd V6 (3.9L) should produce about the same torque as a 3.55'd V8 (5.2L).

That said, the 42RE behind the V6 and the 44RE behind the 5.2 both have a 2.74:1 first gear (keeping the comparison above valid), but the 46Re behind the 5.9 uses a 2.45:1 first gear.

Without all the words:

3.9 L = 75% of 5.2L
3.55 = 75% of 4.56

3.9 L = 66% of 5.9L
2.74 = 111% of 2.45
net change = 74%

74% is close enough to 75% to say that all 3 platforms are close enough that both the V8's with 3.55's are approximately equal to a V6 with 4.56's.

But the loss of fuel mileage on highway would be more than significant.
__________________

68 Camaro (sold): 5.318@128 / 8.568@155 ; 2014 Dragster: 4.79@143 off the trailer
Magnethead494.com Web & Computer Maintenance
McDermott Family Racing

Last edited by magnethead; 12-12-2013 at 11:56 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 11:51 PM
Reply
 
 
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Join DodgeForum
Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
Our Sponsors
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Internet Brands, Inc.


Contact Details & Emails

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2