When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If a 180 is so much better then why did Dodge not put in a 180 factory? Emissions? The hotter the engine, the less emissions it will emit? Also what is the factory thermostat rated to?
If a 180 is so much better then why did Dodge not put in a 180 factory? Emissions? The hotter the engine, the less emissions it will emit? Also what is the factory thermostat rated to?
180 is notnecessarily "better" as the PCM wants to see around 195. If it doesn't get to 195, it will run rich I believe (not absolutely sure). Of course a 180 with a tune set up for 180 eliminates this problem.
It would be nice to have a Chrysler engineer chime in to the discussion here, explaining why we should change from the design they carefully made when these vehicles were designed. Until that happens I've chosen the default of assuming there are good reasons they made the decisions they did, stock 195. Even the cat efficiency issue can have more than altruistic goals. I think it's possible that inefficient cat combustion might create deposits that kill it slightly sooner than it would otherwise. You would never know without a study, and those kind of studies are often cloaked in corporate secrecy.