Go Back   DodgeForum.com > Dodge Trucks > Dodge Ram > 2nd Gen Ram Tech
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

How to tell the difference between a 5.2 and a 5.9

Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old 08-20-2009, 10:59 PM
dodgeram2001 dodgeram2001 is offline
Professional
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Vehicle: 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 5.9
Location: Houston Texas.
Posts: 183
Send a message via AIM to dodgeram2001 Send a message via Yahoo to dodgeram2001
Default

ok so if all is right about the vin an the radiator fan deal then i got a F'n 5.2l an me not knowing things everyone has lied to me when i got the truck corect me if im worng? they said i have a 5.9 an im going off of what yall say than that means i got a 5.2 ? my vin in the 8th place is a Y . my by the radiator it says 5.2l so am i any less of a ram ? do i still have ballz lol. the plans for the truck with lift an tires will i have enough power lol
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Dodge Forums!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:03 PM
JackTheStripper5.9 JackTheStripper5.9 is offline
Rookie
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 74
Default

I have a question about the VIN. I know Z and 5 are for.

Z is the LD 5.9, and 5 is for the HD 5.9. Was the HD only used in the 3500s? Cause I got the build sheet for my truck and it lists "Heavy duty service group", but I got a vin Z.
__________________
97 Dakota SLT "base model" 2wd 318 w/ ax15 5spd, 3.2 8.25" rear 265k+ Holley TB, CAI, glasspack, hurst pistol grip
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:07 PM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw jasonw is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
2010 Dodge Dakota
My Garage
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: 2010 Dodge Dakota 4x4 Quad Cab
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 8,250
Default

I think it was the one they put into the 2500s as well, but I could be mistaken on that.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:20 PM
Ram15002ndGen's Avatar
Ram15002ndGen Ram15002ndGen is offline
Record Breaker
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodgeram2001 View Post
ok so if all is right about the vin an the radiator fan deal then i got a F'n 5.2l an me not knowing things everyone has lied to me when i got the truck corect me if im worng? they said i have a 5.9 an im going off of what yall say than that means i got a 5.2 ? my vin in the 8th place is a Y . my by the radiator it says 5.2l so am i any less of a ram ? do i still have ballz lol. the plans for the truck with lift an tires will i have enough power lol
Nah, you got no *****, you got the baby RAM.






Just messin with ya dude, the 318 is a fine motor. You got a good truck there, enjoy it and clean that motor!
__________________

www.beatcraigslist.com
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:24 PM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw jasonw is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
2010 Dodge Dakota
My Garage
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: 2010 Dodge Dakota 4x4 Quad Cab
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 8,250
Default

Here is a good reference, provided by LMC Truck, on a breakdown of the entire VIN.

Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:29 PM
vmann's Avatar
vmann vmann is offline
Veteran
2000 Dodge Ram 1500
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Vehicle: 2000 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L 4X4 (Big White)
Location: Houston
Posts: 429
Default

My truck originally had a 5.9 in it and all the stickers support that but the guy i bought it from put a 5.2 in it because the 5.9 had rods blow through it. Hard to tell. I thought i had a 5.9 for the longest time before a talked to him about it. At first i was a little pissed about it but have since heard people seem to like the 5.2 more because it is close to the same power levels and the mileage is better. There are a few guys at work that have had a few of both and they seem to favor the 5.2. No idea why.
__________________
Cab lights($18)-Driving lights($25)-Bull Guard (Free)-Flowmaster Super 44 Turned Down-K&N Drop in(Free)-Skyjacker Hydro 7000 Stabilizer($50)-II-Midland CB($30)-Dual Antennas ($35)-Superchips 3815 ($250 Ebay)-HB 2' Leveling Kit-BFG 285/75/16-2 10's infinity.

Last edited by vmann; 08-20-2009 at 11:32 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:33 PM
palerider9999's Avatar
palerider9999 palerider9999 is offline
Rookie
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Vehicle: 1998 Dodge Ram 5.9L, Rebuilt 360, Timbrens
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 73
Default

Crank dampners are different. 5.9 is thicker than the 5.2
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-20-2009, 11:50 PM
JackTheStripper5.9 JackTheStripper5.9 is offline
Rookie
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 74
Default

Besides the vin and the rad sticker, there's a sticker on the door too called the Safety Cert. label. Shows a bunch of info.

If you don't have the stock engine, then it's a bunch of minor differences since the 318 and 360 are so alike. The engine ID is right by the left motor mount.
__________________
97 Dakota SLT "base model" 2wd 318 w/ ax15 5spd, 3.2 8.25" rear 265k+ Holley TB, CAI, glasspack, hurst pistol grip
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 11:50 PM
 
 
 
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Join DodgeForum
Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
Our Sponsors
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.

Internet Brands, Inc.


Contact Details & Emails