Go Back   DodgeForum.com > Dodge Trucks > Dodge Ram > 2nd Gen Ram Tech
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

5.2 vs 5.9 GAS Transmission difference

Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old 04-24-2010, 11:04 PM
Me112233 Me112233 is offline
Registered User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Vehicle: 1998 Dodge Ram 2WD
Location: Franklin, KY
Posts: 8
Default ok, so what is the difference?

When I look up prices for the 2WD transmissions at Dodge dealer web sites, there is a very different price between transmissions for the 5.2 and 5.9 (gas) prices. Not meaning any disrespect, but can anyone answer the question at hand (and not go off on tangents on related issues) and explain the difference between the two transmissions, which are both listed as 46RE transmission.
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Dodge Forums!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-24-2010, 11:23 PM
GeorgiaDodge GeorgiaDodge is offline
Veteran
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Vehicle: 2001 Ram Quadcab 2x4 5.9 Auto
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 323
Default

I know Montec can answer your question, might want to hit him up
__________________
SPEARS (White Devil)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-25-2010, 01:30 AM
yakkier yakkier is offline
Banned
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: May 2006
Vehicle: 1994 Ram 1500 4x4 5.2, 3inch rear blocks, 3inch suspenion lift in front.
Location: Burnsville, mn - Pensacola, fl
Posts: 3,669
Send a message via Yahoo to yakkier
Default

I would think that the 5.9 would have a beefier internals in the transmission vs the 5.2 due to the added torque you get with the 360.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-25-2010, 01:38 AM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw jasonw is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
2010 Dodge Dakota
My Garage
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: 2010 Dodge Dakota 4x4 Quad Cab
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 8,250
Default

Nope. Should be same exact transmissions. Perhaps they screwed up, and listed a 4x4 tranny?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-25-2010, 02:02 AM
J415's Avatar
J415 J415 is offline
Champion
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 1997 dodge ram 1500 5.2L 4x2
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,402
Default

The only difference I can think of is the torque converters on the 5.2's are not weighted and the 5.9's are weighted. There not interchangeable. Other then that,it's the same. Ask for the build sheet for the 5.2 and the 5.9 then you'll know the difference. What's the price difference? Can you give us the link so we can check it out?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-25-2010, 08:48 AM
MonteC's Avatar
MonteC MonteC is offline
Record Breaker
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Vehicle: '99 F350 PSD
Location: North Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,245
Send a message via AIM to MonteC
Default

The price difference like J said is most likely due to the different torque converter. They have different stall speeds and may be weighted a little different. Everything inside those two transmissions is completely identical. They are the same.

If the price difference is not due to the converter than it is due to the bad dealership taking advantage of peoples ignorance. Which many have done for many years.
__________________
Professional Transmission Technician
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-25-2010, 12:53 PM
Gerehead8 Gerehead8 is offline
Record Breaker
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Vehicle: 1994 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J415 View Post
The only difference I can think of is the torque converters on the 5.2's are not weighted and the 5.9's are weighted. There not interchangeable. Other then that,it's the same. Ask for the build sheet for the 5.2 and the 5.9 then you'll know the difference. What's the price difference? Can you give us the link so we can check it out?
The converter is not weighted in the 46RE's, the flexplate is.

To the rest of the thread:
I have never seen a 4x4 V6 and I read somewhere that the 5.2L was the smallest engine allowed in the 4x4s.

I have never seen an A727 (36RH) in a 2nd gen from the factory but my service manual for a 1994 has the 32RH, 36RH, and 37RH rebuild instructions along with the 42RH, 46RH, and 47RH. I have the 46RH in my 1994 truck FYI (it originally had a 5.2).
__________________
1994 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 5.9L
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-25-2010, 01:11 PM
J415's Avatar
J415 J415 is offline
Champion
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 1997 dodge ram 1500 5.2L 4x2
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerehead8 View Post
The converter is not weighted in the 46RE's, the flexplate is.
Sorry but the torque converter IS weighted on 5.9's There are weights welded on the back of th converter because the 5.9's are externally balanced.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-25-2010, 02:16 PM
Gerehead8 Gerehead8 is offline
Record Breaker
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Vehicle: 1994 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J415 View Post
Sorry but the torque converter IS weighted on 5.9's There are weights welded on the back of th converter because the 5.9's are externally balanced.
Let me clarify:

The 1994-95 46RH trannies behind the 5.9L had one large weight welded to the front of the converter for the external balance.

In 1996 with the 46RE trannies and the 5.9L dodge moved the weights to the flexplate and had a neutrally balanced torque converter.

The 5.2L is internally balanced and has always had a neutral balanced flexplate and torque converter.

There are small weights often welded to the torque converter to balance it but these are not the 5.9L balance weights.
__________________
1994 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 5.9L
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-26-2010, 12:53 AM
Me112233 Me112233 is offline
Registered User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Vehicle: 1998 Dodge Ram 2WD
Location: Franklin, KY
Posts: 8
Default link where I found the prices

Quote:
Originally Posted by J415 View Post
The only difference I can think of is the torque converters on the 5.2's are not weighted and the 5.9's are weighted. There not interchangeable. Other then that,it's the same. Ask for the build sheet for the 5.2 and the 5.9 then you'll know the difference. What's the price difference? Can you give us the link so we can check it out?
Here is the link. You may have to input information (Dodge, 1998, Ram 1500, automatic transmission). http://www.chryslerpartscenter.com/p...layCatalogid=0
Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 12:53 AM
 
 
 
Reply




Tags
12, 1500, 52, 52l, 59, 96, diesel, difference, dodge, gas, interchangeability, ram, ton, transmission, transmissions, year

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Join DodgeForum
Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
Our Sponsors
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 AM.

Internet Brands, Inc.


Contact Details & Emails