DodgeForum.com
DodgeForum.com Home - Dodge Marketplace - Dodge Photo Galleries - Create an Account - Dodge News

Go Back   DodgeForum.com > Dodge Trucks > Dodge Ram > 3rd Gen Ram

3rd Gen Ram 2002 - 2008 Rams


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:49 AM
06RamTRX4 06RamTRX4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 06 Ram 1500 SLT/TRX4, QC.
Location: CT
Posts: 20
Default

I just got an 06 with the Hemi... love it. If you get it with the factory LSD, just be sure to maintain it. I am getting both diff fluids changed (synthetic).
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Dodge Forums!
__________________

06 TRX4/SLT, 3.92 LSD, Bone Stock (for now).
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
  #12  
Old 02-27-2009, 12:28 PM
Rdavenp3 Rdavenp3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 2008 Dodge Ram 4x4 SXT Quad Cab
Posts: 18
Default

I've got a '08 4X4 with the 4.7L and it runs great. But, the '08 4.7L is rated at 310hp, which is closer to the Hemi in hp. The older model 4.7L's are underpowered and I wouldn't even consider anything but a Hemi.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-27-2009, 02:43 PM
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71 HammerZ71 is offline
Site Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
2004 Dodge Ram 1500
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 2004 QCSB 1500 Hemi 4x4
Posts: 11,033
Default

Lot of miles, towing occasionally, you are a prime candidate for a CTD! Now finding a fairly recent used one is gonna be the trick. Like 'Feej said, stay the hell away from the 07+ ones with the 6.7, unless you like to look a check engine lights (CELs) all the time. Emissions on the 6.7 is giving Chrysler/Cummins fits.

An 04.5 through 07 with the venerable old 5.9 CTD would be great, and will not suffer near the mpg loss while towing decent weight like any gas engine would. If you can find one that's not been beaten on and they ain't wanting you to take out a 2nd mtg. to get it, jump on one!

A good second choice would be a Hemi, great HP especially in the mid to upper rpm range and decent low end torque. Plus a lot of mods out there for it to get more low end power to the wheels for better towing. Also, it's gonna get the same to maybe 1 mpg less than the 4.7 at worst.

The pre '08 4.7 is a fantastic engine, durability wise, but so is the Hemi. But it's better suited in Jeep Grand Cherokee's and Dakota's. Would be a fine choice in a RCSB truck, especially a 4x2, but not suited well for a QC or 4x4 and especially out of it's element in a full size tow/haul truck...
__________________

Last edited by HammerZ71; 03-01-2009 at 08:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-27-2009, 03:08 PM
dutter dutter is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 2003 Ram
Location: NEPA
Posts: 69
Default

all this hemi talk, i feel inadequate with my 4.7.....like my peter just just shrank
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-27-2009, 03:46 PM
SeMiGoD's Avatar
SeMiGoD SeMiGoD is offline
Record Breaker
2007 Dodge Ram 1500
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 07 Dodge Ram 1500 QC Hemi
Location: Lincoln, ND
Posts: 1,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HammerZ71 View Post
Lot of miles, towing occasionally, you are a prime candidate for a CTD! Now finding a fairly recent used one is gonna be the trick. Like 'Feej said, stay the hell away from the 07+ ones with the 6.7, unless you like to look a check engine lights (CELs) all the time. Emissions on the 6.7 is giving Chrysler/Cummins fits.

An 04.5 through 07 with the venerable old 5.9 CTD would be great, and will not suffer near the mpg loss while towing decent weight like any gas engine would. If you can find one that's not been beaten on and they ain't wanting you to take out a 2nd mtg. to get it, jump on one!

A good second choice would be a Hemi, great HP especially in the mid to upper rpm range and decent low end torque. Plus a lot of mods out there for it to get more low end power to the wheels for better towing. Also, it's gonna get the same to maybe 1 mpg less than the 4.7 at worst.

The pre '08 4.7 is a fantastic engine, durability wise, but so is the Hemi. But it's better suited in Jeep Grand Cherokee's and Dakota's. Would be a fine choice in a RCSB truck, especially a 4x2, but not suted well for a QC or 4x4 and especially out of it's element in a full size tow/haul truck...
Only problem i see with the older CTD is the fuel. New fuel has had the sulfur cut down to almost nothing. 15 ppm. Older diesels without the heavy emissions crap run far better with old sulfur rich fuel. Basically, not the power is SHOULD have which = less milage etc...
__________________

A Bunch
Of Extra
Black Stuff
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-27-2009, 03:54 PM
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71 HammerZ71 is offline
Site Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
2004 Dodge Ram 1500
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 2004 QCSB 1500 Hemi 4x4
Posts: 11,033
Default

I haven't noticed where the couple of guys I know with 5.9 CTD's are complaining about any felt power loss with the newer fuel and trust me, at least one guy would notice any loss of performance and bitch like hell.
Of course, if that's an issue you could always cheat. I won't name names, but I've got two separate friends in Ga. who go to the off-road/tractor pumps to fill their trucks. They been doing it forever, swear they get higher performance and it costs considerably less. Ain't neither one been caught yet...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:48 PM
CreativeOffroad's Avatar
CreativeOffroad CreativeOffroad is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: '02 Ram 1500 SLT
Location: Orange County
Posts: 458
Default

Give the 4.7 some credit. My '02 4.7 QC's power is pretty good
__________________
'02 1500 QC/SB SLT - 2wd - 4.7L - Rough Country 6" Suspension Lift w/ RC Nitro Shocks - 18" XD Monsters - 35" Toyo M/T's - FlowMaster SI/DO - Legacy 8" Media Screen - Showin' them what a 2wd can do
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-27-2009, 05:35 PM
raminator08's Avatar
raminator08 raminator08 is offline
Record Breaker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 08 Ram
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdhuntr View Post
Be different! Get the 4.7L!
or be even more different and get a 3.7 jk
you wont be disappointed with a hemi but if you dont need that extra power increase, you could just get a 4.7 which would be fine for cruising on the highway.
__________________

08 Ram RC/SB Black- K&N CAI, Flowmaster exhaust, 22" rims, vertical grill, LED underbody lights. Black Truck Club Member #002
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-27-2009, 06:31 PM
SeMiGoD's Avatar
SeMiGoD SeMiGoD is offline
Record Breaker
2007 Dodge Ram 1500
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 07 Dodge Ram 1500 QC Hemi
Location: Lincoln, ND
Posts: 1,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HammerZ71 View Post
I haven't noticed where the couple of guys I know with 5.9 CTD's are complaining about any felt power loss with the newer fuel and trust me, at least one guy would notice any loss of performance and bitch like hell.
Of course, if that's an issue you could always cheat. I won't name names, but I've got two separate friends in Ga. who go to the off-road/tractor pumps to fill their trucks. They been doing it forever, swear they get higher performance and it costs considerably less. Ain't neither one been caught yet...
They arent getting higher performance...they are getting the performance their rigs SHOULD have. Off road fuel is not the degraded garbage at the pumps now, its the good ol stuff. I know its a bit different yet the same.
My semi lost 2 mpg overall average even with the 500 ppm fuel. Now that 500 ppm is getting phased out and all i can reall find is 15 ppm...my poor cummins n14 is suffering.
__________________

A Bunch
Of Extra
Black Stuff
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-27-2009, 07:30 PM
Ron505 Ron505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 21
Default

Well, last night I drove a '06 w/20k miles and Hemi, and tonight I drove a '08 Big Horn w/24k and 4.7. There is quite a difference. But do I need the difference......still unsure. I guess I would like to know about reliability of both, and MPG versus eachother. Again, I will be on the highway about 90% of my traveling. Thanks for the great input so far. BTW, LSD?

Last edited by Ron505; 02-27-2009 at 07:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Tags
47, 57, difference, dodge, durango, hemi, magnum, mpg, power, ram, versus, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0