Go Back   DodgeForum.com > General > Brand News, Concepts & Rumors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Brand News, Concepts & Rumors Have you heard? Have you seen? No? Come on in, read and discuss the latest from Dodge. (This is not a tech section.)

View Poll Results: Should the next generation Challenger be smaller or stay the same?
It should be smaller, similar to the Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang. 7 41.18%
It is perfect how it is right now - bigger is better. 10 58.82%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Should the next Challenger be smaller or stay the same?

Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-13-2013, 01:19 PM
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT BadStratRT is offline
The Forum Tyrant
Dodge Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle: 1972 Dodge Demon 340
Location: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Posts: 27,505
Send a message via AIM to BadStratRT
Default Should the next Challenger be smaller or stay the same?

The Challenger is in the process of a great sales year but it still falls well shy of the Mustang and Camaro. Some people blame the size of the current Challenger...so should the next generation Dodge Challenger be smaller?

Click the image to open in full size.

Click here to look at the pros and cons on the DF Front Page.
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Dodge Forums!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2011-Dodge-Challenger-SE-SS-600.jpg (62.1 KB, 80 views)
__________________

An old school sig from Alex, as a tribute to a fallen friend - RIP Alex.

Buying a camera and taking pictures of your own car doesn't make you a professional photographer.

1972 Dodge Demon 340 (H code)-1983 Dodge Mirada 340-2002 Dodge Stratus R/T Coupe-2006 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-13-2013, 01:48 PM
Kensai's Avatar
Kensai Kensai is offline
Champion
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Vehicle: 2000 Black Durango R/T
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 2,571
tommy chau tommychau00
Default

I prefer the challenger to stay the same size as it is. But possibly user lighter weight materials where needed to shave as much weight off the vehicle.
__________________
Black 2000 Durango 5.9 R/T, Infinity Reference 6012i, Clear Headlight lens,
Fastman 52mm ThrottleBody,Fastman custom built Tranny,Castrol Full Syntec,
OEM K&N Air filter,Monroe Reflexes,BFG LongTrail Touring T/A's,180 Stat,
F1 Airgap Intake,Champion IR Truck Plugs,Custom Made Ram Air Intake, Hughes SCT Tuner
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-13-2013, 08:43 PM
NathanLaurent NathanLaurent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1
Default

No, they got it right the first time. Way better car than any other competitor! That's coming from a chevy guy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-14-2013, 12:27 AM
Jareski's Avatar
Jareski Jareski is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 2007 Dodge Ram 1500 TRX4 5.7L Hemi V8 QC
Location: Manitoba, CANADA
Posts: 377
Jareski
Send a message via Skype™ to Jareski
Default

It's a looker. Styling-wise, they nailed it. To change the size would be a mistake. But as always, making it lighter is a wise choice.
__________________

2007 Dodge Ram 114,455 kms /// 71,119 miles
2006 Ford Five Hundred 80,232 kms /// 49,854 miles
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-14-2013, 01:19 AM
Klokworx's Avatar
Klokworx Klokworx is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Vehicle: 98 dakota 2.5 rc,sb
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 74
Default

im a big fan of muscle cars and couples from the classic era... its too bad they make them into family cars now. just hope the challenger doesnt take that route
__________________
'98 dakota, 2.5, short box, reg cab. mods coming slowly
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-14-2013, 09:15 AM
mcfamprid mcfamprid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Vehicle: 2010 challenger R/T classic
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1
Default

they should leave the car the same, but turn the R/T Classic into a striped down version make get rid of all the power options and half the air bags.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-15-2013, 01:49 PM
bluebeast1562 bluebeast1562 is offline
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Vehicle: 2013 Ram 1500
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 162
Default

I concur with my fellow vehicle people. On a side note, was looking at the Dart, not to buy one but just in passing, think they need to up the size a bit and put a 6 cylinder or a small block V8. It would appear that the Challenger is based on the original look and same would hold true for the Dart, the current version does no justice for the original model.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-15-2013, 05:49 PM
lxman1's Avatar
lxman1 lxman1 is offline
Multi-Section Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 2008 QC Ram BigHorn Hemi
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 9,083
Send a message via AIM to lxman1
Default

Same design, just a bit smaller dimensions and about 1000lbs lighter.
__________________
2008 RAM 1500 Sunburst Orange BigHorn. 5.7L HEMI
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-16-2013, 12:00 AM
Reallunacy Reallunacy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 11
Default

I personally like the size as is, but the weight needs to be dropped. The problem is that it simply isn't as fast and if it were it would be doing a lot better. In fact I know several people personally that bought a Mustang over the Challenger for that reason. No one can deny the power plant in the Challenger, but we lose around the track every time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-17-2013, 10:55 PM
diverdan007 diverdan007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2
Thumbs up

stay the same . dodge does not have to fallow ford or chevys
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-18-2013, 09:08 AM
T.C. T.C. is offline
Professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Vehicle: 5.2L Auto Dodge Dakota 2wd, 1992
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 213
Default

I can agree with everyone else who already posted before me, I feel its not the size of the challenger that needs to be changed but the attitude, I do agree on what the "head Honcho" feels about keeping mopar preformance vehicles all "old school" naturally aspirated, and keeping true to the retro theme. Though when comparing agianst the mustang or camaro and even looking at some of the european cheaper coupe's they are unfortunately faster then our beloved challenger. I feel that even when comparing the 2013 shelby vs our challenger the total weight of the vehicle is lighter then our's and there is supercharged, and when looking at the 20014/2015 svt mustang that is going to come out, it will have a dual turbo and IRS and still be LIGHTER then ours, so it will be even faster it corners.

I don't know what else to say about our challenger, though I feel proud of challenger over the mustang and camaro where we have the ***** to stay naturally aspirated and keep the big old school retro theme, though we need to gut the challenger out while still using the origional unibody. I agree remove some of the heavy airbags, remove some of that sound deadening in the interior, and some of the plasic aswell, and change the seats since each of the seats weigh around 50lb. As well I agree on making a stripped out version of the challenger like removal of the back seats and a different tune and cam swap. Well there is my beef.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-18-2013, 12:04 PM
jrsager843 jrsager843 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1
Default

The Challenger was originally a beast and should remain so. The car is a perfect example of an American classic muscle car.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-02-2013, 06:49 PM
97 3.5 Intrepid 97 3.5 Intrepid is offline
Record Breaker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,628
Default

In my view, if they want to compete with the Mustang & Camaro, they need to make it smaller and lighter. If they want to keep it the same size, they need to rename it Charger and rename the Charger something else (Coronet, Polara, Monaco) as it is more like a Charger than a Challenger in size and class. In my opinion, I think they should use the V10 instead of a supercharged Hemi to stand out as different, it would help to justify keeping the V10 in production (economies of scale) and considering that it gives the aftermarket so much more potential.
__________________
College Graduate
B.S. in Marketing
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2013, 06:49 PM
 
 
 
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Join DodgeForum
Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
Our Sponsors
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.

Internet Brands, Inc.


Contact Details & Emails