Question of the Week Is it a good move for Dodge to put the 2.4L mill in more models? - DodgeForum.com


Brand News, Concepts & Rumors Have you heard? Have you seen? No? Come on in, read and discuss the latest from Dodge. (This is not a tech section.)

View Poll Results: Is it a good move for Dodge to put the Dart GT engine in more trimlines?
Yes, more power is always good.
1
50.00%
No, buyers need choices.
1
50.00%
Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll

Question of the Week Is it a good move for Dodge to put the 2.4L mill in more models?

Reply
 
 
  #1  
Old 09-16-2013, 12:54 PM
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT
BadStratRT is offline
The Forum Tyrant
Dodge Forum Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Posts: 27,643
Default Question of the Week Is it a good move for Dodge to put the 2.4L mill in more models?

Dodge has announced that the 2.4L engine from the 2013 Dart GT is now standard in the GT, SXT and Limited models.



Do you think that is a good idea? Will it improve Dart sales?

Click here to look at the pros and cons on the DF front page.

Make sure to vote above and tell us whether or not you like this move below!
Attached Thumbnails
Question of the Week Is it a good move for Dodge to put the 2.4L mill in more models?-dart-cobblestone.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-16-2013, 11:02 PM
scatpack_69's Avatar
scatpack_69
scatpack_69 is offline
All Star
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 759
Default

Yep.

GT still as it's own tuning, so it is expected to get less mileage than the other models with the 2.4. I'm guessing GT has a different power curve, maybe "feels" peppier behind the wheel.

I'd still like to see the GT with a ~250hp turbo 2.4...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2013, 06:13 PM
97 3.5 Intrepid
97 3.5 Intrepid is offline
Record Breaker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,650
Default

It depends. If the version of the 2.4L Tigershark has the same gearing and output as used in the GT, it is a bad move as it could undercut the sales of the GT while not addressing the problem of the poor fuel economy for its class. If they offer an "Atkins setting on the VVT" for the 2.4L Tigershark for the SXT trim and possibly the Limited and use taller gearing for the transmissions, this will offer the best of both worlds. Better fuel economy and better power than the 2.0L while not cutting into the purpose of the GT. The problem that I see with having 2.4L as it is, it begs 3 questions in my mind. Why get this when I can get an Avenger which is about the same size, has a much more powerful engine with almost the same fuel economy? or Why not get a Charger 8speed which has more room, more power, and better fuel economy? If the 3.6L Pentastar can get almost the same fuel economy in the Avenger why not just offer the 3.2L Pentastar which could probably match the 2.4L?

In general, I can't understand why these I4s are so awful on gas. They have a 6-speed automatic yet, they are still getting 2-3 mpg lower than the optional manual? Also, why are they getting 2-4 mpg lower than their competition in the Dart? Also, why did the addition of the 62TE to the Avenger/200 only boost the highway fuel economy by 1mpg?
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lilgremlin
1st Gen Durango
4
07-03-2015 12:03 AM
carid
Vendor Group And Special Buys
0
06-30-2015 07:24 AM
blaqyukon
Dodge Caravan
0
06-27-2015 01:41 PM
drkveene
1st Gen Durango
0
06-25-2015 08:52 AM
thepeshmode
1st Gen Durango
0
06-24-2015 05:07 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
What's your question?
Send