DodgeForum.com
DodgeForum.com Home - Dodge Marketplace - Dodge Photo Galleries - Create an Account - Dodge News

Go Back   DodgeForum.com > The DF Lounge > Off Topic

Off Topic A place to boldly go off topic. Just about anything goes.

Sponsored by: Bakliner



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old 05-11-2009, 08:37 AM
paul05dak paul05dak is offline
Record Breaker
2005 Dodge Dakota
My Garage
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 05 Dakota 4.7 Quad
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,105
Default

whos better? all depends on what your looking for the truck to do. I liked the Dakota over the ram for my useage. hauling our boat and family without being too tall. Size wise? internal I believe is close to the same. Doors are same exact size of a ram. That is why the door guards are the same for the dakota and ram. This is a personal preference. Like pepsi or coke, boxers or briefs, top or bottom....
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Dodge Forums!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
  #12  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:36 AM
Laramie1997's Avatar
Laramie1997 Laramie1997 is offline
99% Insane
Dodge Forum Moderator
1997 Dodge Ram 1500
My Garage
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Vehicle: 1997 Ram 5.2 4x4 RCLB
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 5,245
Send a message via AIM to Laramie1997 Send a message via Yahoo to Laramie1997 Send a message via Skype™ to Laramie1997
Default

If you are looking at performance, I would go with a dak. Terms of use ability, look at a ram.
Looking at who is quicker, I would have to assume that if a dak and a ram were paired up against each other in a race with the same motor, the dak would win. Just because of the power to weight difference.

Newer daks have little aftermarket options, while the newer rams are loaded with different ideas and uses.

It's a personal opinion, and there is absolutely no right or wrong answer.
__________________

See? Told Ya!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:49 AM
lb79theone's Avatar
lb79theone lb79theone is offline
Record Breaker
2001 Dodge Ram 1500
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 (Half ton) off road sport 5.9 liter V8 360 Magnum 4x4
Location: Maine! ( GET A HOLD OF ME IF YOU WANT TO GET ME ON FACEBOOK.COM, AND CARDOMAIN.COM)
Posts: 1,408
Default

Lol, just wanted some hits, thanks!
__________________
-2001(2nd gen.) DODGE RAM 1500 (half ton) 5.9 LITER 360 MAGNUM V8 OFF-ROAD SPORT EDITION 4x4-
Make sure you check out my profile and garage for pictures and modifications etc.!
South 207 Trucks!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:50 AM
lb79theone's Avatar
lb79theone lb79theone is offline
Record Breaker
2001 Dodge Ram 1500
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 (Half ton) off road sport 5.9 liter V8 360 Magnum 4x4
Location: Maine! ( GET A HOLD OF ME IF YOU WANT TO GET ME ON FACEBOOK.COM, AND CARDOMAIN.COM)
Posts: 1,408
Default

I know, there both very good trucks and I like them both, just wanted the pride to come out in all of us. I love Dodges no matter what.
__________________
-2001(2nd gen.) DODGE RAM 1500 (half ton) 5.9 LITER 360 MAGNUM V8 OFF-ROAD SPORT EDITION 4x4-
Make sure you check out my profile and garage for pictures and modifications etc.!
South 207 Trucks!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-11-2009, 12:27 PM
magnethead magnethead is offline
Record Breaker
2005 Dodge Ram 1500
My Garage
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mansfield TX
Posts: 1,313
Send a message via ICQ to magnethead Send a message via AIM to magnethead Send a message via Yahoo to magnethead
Default

As my sig denotes, we have both, a 3rd Gen ram and 2nd gen dakota.

The 2nd gen dakotas are by far the best looking of the group, while the 4th gen ram absolutely looks like it's hungry.

Obviously, the power to weight ratio gives the performance win to the Dakota. Honestly, the rams have no reason to have a V6 option.

If I want a mudding truck, i'll get a second gen ram. They are absolute tanks.

The reason I would not get a dakota, is because after the 10th or 12th ball joint change, you'd have the cost of a ram. Unless you go and put aftermarket A-arms on or something right off the bat.

If I'm going to go racing, It's a lowered dakota hands down. They don't weight alot, but the CoG is still plenty high. Put in a rear sway bar and lower it 2 or 3" (or airbag it), and should be plenty good.

Both the dakota and ram can tow when properly equipped and loaded, with a trailer brake controller. Yes, the ram can obviously haul more, but the dakota, with a weight distributing hitch or helper springs, can still haul it's fair share. Obviously for a 5th wheel or gooseneck, there's no option.
__________________

(right) My 01 Dakota sport 3.9 4x2 V6 - 117,000 and counting (Rebuilt 42RE @ 116K)
(left) Dad's 05 Ram 1500 Lone Star HEMI: tonneau'd - 196,000 + ~800 per week or so (Still going strong- First brake & Hub change @ 196K)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-11-2009, 02:01 PM
94rt10ohio's Avatar
94rt10ohio 94rt10ohio is offline
Retired Administrator
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10
My Garage
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle: 94 Viper RT/10
Location: Northwood, OH
Posts: 8,036
Send a message via AIM to 94rt10ohio
Default

I nominate this for the most ridiculous post of the year. Why not compare a Caliber to a Grand Cherokee?

Different class of vehicle. You buy based on your needs and finances in this case.
__________________
04 Ram SRT-10<--Click For Sale PM for details
09 Ram 4x4<--Click


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-11-2009, 03:37 PM
User User is offline
Champion
2000 Dodge Dakota
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 2000 Bright White Single Cab Dakota R/T 5.9L 360ci
Location: Justin; Texas
Posts: 2,734
Send a message via AIM to User
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94rt10ohio View Post
I nominate this for the most ridiculous post of the year. Why not compare a Caliber to a Grand Cherokee?

Different class of vehicle. You buy based on your needs and finances in this case.
AMEN~ Thank you.
__________________

Performance Mods, Cosmetic Mods, and Other Mods:
http://dfwdakotas.com/DFWDakotaSite/user_info.html
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-11-2009, 03:45 PM
ericemery's Avatar
ericemery ericemery is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
2006 Dodge Dakota
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2006 Dakota Quad Cab
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12,713
Send a message via AIM to ericemery Send a message via Yahoo to ericemery
Default

I second that nomination... and move to strike! (ok, maybe not...)
__________________
-Eric-
DodgeForum.com Administrator
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-11-2009, 04:26 PM
Midnight's Avatar
Midnight Midnight is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum ModeratorHall of Fame Member
2004 Dodge Stratus
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Vehicle: 2004 Dodge Stratus R/T (3.0L V6)
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 27,386
Send a message via AIM to Midnight Send a message via MSN to Midnight Send a message via Yahoo to Midnight
Default

Let's not get corny with it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-11-2009, 04:28 PM
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge PurplDodge is online now
Grand Champion
1999 Dodge Ram 1500
My Garage
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: Ariens Grand Sierra garden tractor
Location: Lawrenceburg, IN
Posts: 6,144
Default

What a stupid question! Of course the Ram is bigger!!!!

Dont be like the previous owner of your truck and make 10,000 stupid ass threads!
__________________
Stupid is as stupid does.

Quote:
For $20 a plug, I should be able to have sex with it
Reply With Quote
Reply



Tags
14, 1500, 1996, 2009, 360, 47, 59, dakota, dodge, faster, hemi, magnum, ram, rt, slow, versus

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0