I think that the market needs a new Ramcharger - DodgeForum.com


Ramcharger, Trailduster & Power Wagon Grrrr!! Tough Trucks! The Dodge Ramcharger and Plymouth Trailduster were full size SUV's that had good looks and brute strength. The Dodge Power Wagon was comparable to them in toughness, but came in pickup truck form only.

I think that the market needs a new Ramcharger

Reply
 
 
  #1  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:10 PM
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT
BadStratRT is online now
The Forum Tyrant
Dodge Forum Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Posts: 27,634
Default I think that the market needs a new Ramcharger

While the modern Chrysler SUVs are great looking and great running vehicles, they are a long way from what the Ramcharger was to the industry.

Click here to read my thoughts on a new Ramcharger on the DF front page.

Do you think that a low priced, Durango-based Ram brand SUV with the bigger power and lower price due to less goodies would sell?

Last edited by BadStratRT; 05-14-2012 at 05:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-14-2012, 08:28 PM
Wombat Ranger's Avatar
Wombat Ranger
Wombat Ranger is offline
Grand Champion
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bitterroot Valley, MT
Posts: 5,650
Default

Add 3/4 ton axles to the equation (power wagon sourced?), a G56, and 12 years later I will buy one off the used market for sure!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2012, 01:03 AM
walter2
walter2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6
Default The new Ramcharger

I think that this would be a great idea. I have noted that there is a big difference in the early 2000's durangos to later 2000's and then to the 2010's. They increase the electronic wizardry and decrease on true functionality. I think a stripped down version offered in a V6 and V8 engine 4x4 package would be great!!! I would buy one. The main reason I don't want a new durango is that they have lost their roots. I am not the least worried about using my 2001 in a field (granted partly due to age) or pulling stumps. Can not picture doig that with a new Durango.
I LOVE the 4x4 on our Durango. It has saved my butt on many a snowy wintry night in Upstate NY. I agree that I would be worried about throwing a new Durango in to the fray (though likely more capable) like I do my 2001.
The things I need: seating for 6-7 people comfortaby
4x4 that kicks butt in snow
reliability and power
No fear of messing up a $40,000 vehicle when I need to use it as an SUV.

Bring on the Durango in Ramcharger trim!!!
Too bad they are going to kill off the Durango........ They are nutz!!!!
Bet you they would sell more in a Ramcharger package at a low tech price!!

Thanks for posting this!!
Walter2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-22-2012, 01:05 AM
lvphotos
lvphotos is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 409
Default

I have seen the export four-door ram "suburban " in 1998 body style why is this full-size here in the states?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2012, 04:52 PM
valenzia_92
valenzia_92 is offline
Amateur
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Default

I think dodge needs to build a fullsize , the previous durango was bigger than the new one that is more premium suv oriented , there should be a hardcore suv based on the ram chassis if you ask me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2012, 04:52 PM
valenzia_92
valenzia_92 is offline
Amateur
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2x1972 View Post
Add 3/4 ton axles to the equation (power wagon sourced?), a G56, and 12 years later I will buy one off the used market for sure!
a suv based on the power wagon chassis and drivetrain would be awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-09-2012, 10:39 PM
CaymanComm
CaymanComm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grand Cayman
Posts: 1
Default

Great thread. I have owned a 78, 83 and 93 RamCharger and a 98 and 2011 Durango. When I bought the 93 I knew it was the last model year and that they were killing it off. 1992 was the year that GMC upgraded the Suburban and brought out the Tahoe and Yukon models (yuk!). That year saw all of those departing from the typical big, workhorse SUV and starting to morph into the luxury SUV and crossover market today. The 93 I had had hardly any bells and whistles compared to the 93 Chevy SUV's.

I complained every year since 1993 that there wasn't a Dodge vehicle to replace the RC. Ford was the closest to come up with a reasonable substitute with the Explorer/Expedition (and Excursion fiasco) models which captured most of the public safety fleet sales. I jumped at the first gen Durango and always said if it had been 10% larger or based on the Ram BR pickup base, it would have been a killer vehicle. The second gen Durango was disgusting and an embarassment to the manufacturer.
I love the 2011 Durango but would I ever take it off road....not a chance in hell. I will use my Jeep TJ for that!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2012, 05:22 PM
volaredon
volaredon is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 639
Default

yup and if they said that they "had to" have the Durango they should have offered a 2 door version I hate 4 door vehicles! My 19 yo son daily drives an 89 Ramcharger and knows that if he ever gets tired of it, that I will take it off his hands; dont see it happenin yet....
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Group And Special Buys
2
05-21-2016 08:50 AM
Roccorr
Ramcharger, Trailduster & Power Wagon
3
02-15-2016 11:09 AM
Roccorr
1st Gen Ram Tech
0
09-21-2015 07:54 PM
carid
Vendor Group And Special Buys
0
09-21-2015 11:40 AM
rzepeda
Dodge/Ram Diesel
2
09-13-2015 01:35 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
What's your question?
Send