Superchips Questions and Updates
#2191
^^ thanks for the quick response Silver^^
I'll look over frog's and Matt's schedules this afternoon.
Any other input on level of "aggressiveness" (if thats a accurate classification) would be appreciated.
nateroach
I'll look over frog's and Matt's schedules this afternoon.
Any other input on level of "aggressiveness" (if thats a accurate classification) would be appreciated.
nateroach
#2192
ok...
So I haven't had the chance to update my tuner as i am stuck at work, but I have been looking over the shift schedules that are hosted on the mcfail website (thanks for those that have provided these).
After looking over these shift schedules... well there is a lot of data and info here. My first question is if there is an idiot tune aka, a 1 click SC defined shift schedule (forgive me this probably has already been covered)?
Second question: of those schedules hosted on the mcfail site, are some more purpose specific than others?
after reviewing the schedules here is where I am stuck.
I have an 07, so I am looking at those in the 07 folder, but I was wondering what one would work best as a starting point.
I know that this is all up to the user to modify to their taste, but are some geared more for a specific purpose then others.
For example...
I know that Rubberfrog has a 2500, so I am not realling looking at that one for a base line because I have a 1500, and in an earlier post it was mentioned that 2500 TP's won't be the same as 1500 TP's. So I am left with Matt's and Mark's shift schedules.
Now comparing Matt's schedule to Marks, it appears that Matt's is more "aggressive" (higher shift speed) while marks are closer to the stock #'s. My question is if Matt's schedule is more suited for performance/WOT runs than Mark's? I am not looking for a "speed" tune per say. I am just looking for more responsive shifting.
Sorry for the long post and it may be confusing, but I am just looking for some direction on the best starting point for a mild trans tune that is focused more on responsive, smooth shifting that won't compromise MPG
thanks,
Nateroach
So I haven't had the chance to update my tuner as i am stuck at work, but I have been looking over the shift schedules that are hosted on the mcfail website (thanks for those that have provided these).
After looking over these shift schedules... well there is a lot of data and info here. My first question is if there is an idiot tune aka, a 1 click SC defined shift schedule (forgive me this probably has already been covered)?
Second question: of those schedules hosted on the mcfail site, are some more purpose specific than others?
after reviewing the schedules here is where I am stuck.
I have an 07, so I am looking at those in the 07 folder, but I was wondering what one would work best as a starting point.
I know that this is all up to the user to modify to their taste, but are some geared more for a specific purpose then others.
For example...
I know that Rubberfrog has a 2500, so I am not realling looking at that one for a base line because I have a 1500, and in an earlier post it was mentioned that 2500 TP's won't be the same as 1500 TP's. So I am left with Matt's and Mark's shift schedules.
Now comparing Matt's schedule to Marks, it appears that Matt's is more "aggressive" (higher shift speed) while marks are closer to the stock #'s. My question is if Matt's schedule is more suited for performance/WOT runs than Mark's? I am not looking for a "speed" tune per say. I am just looking for more responsive shifting.
Sorry for the long post and it may be confusing, but I am just looking for some direction on the best starting point for a mild trans tune that is focused more on responsive, smooth shifting that won't compromise MPG
thanks,
Nateroach
Rubberfrog has a 1500. That's a good schedule to start off with. You can tweak to your liking from there.
Yes, Matt's is much more aggressive. I would start off with Rubberfrog's schedule.
Sil
#2193
No one-click schedules, unless you choose SC's proprietary schedule (you're using that now). This is totally controlled by you. Superchips has no input in regards to USER schedules.
Rubberfrog has a 1500. That's a good schedule to start off with. You can tweak to your liking from there.
Yes, Matt's is much more aggressive. I would start off with Rubberfrog's schedule.
Sil
Rubberfrog has a 1500. That's a good schedule to start off with. You can tweak to your liking from there.
Yes, Matt's is much more aggressive. I would start off with Rubberfrog's schedule.
Sil
thanks,
nateroach
#2197
superchips
I have a 2003 1500 Hemi and also a 2007 2500 ram hemi. Would i be able to use the same flashpaq for both? I know the same machine will work for both, but can i necessarily use it for both trucks. I am not trying to scam the company, but I own both trucks. thanks for any help. I appreciate it all.
#2198
I have a 2003 1500 Hemi and also a 2007 2500 ram hemi. Would i be able to use the same flashpaq for both? I know the same machine will work for both, but can i necessarily use it for both trucks. I am not trying to scam the company, but I own both trucks. thanks for any help. I appreciate it all.
#2199
yeah, you only get one with the flashpaq, although, I'm not sure of the specifics on the cortex....