Chrysler expanding Detroit plant for car-based Grand Cherokee
#11
Neither was the Liberty, but it was a immediate success the way it was. Chrysler has tried this now with the Pacifica, Journey, the Compass, and the Patriot. The Journey the jury is still out on, the Pacifica failed, and the Compass/Patriot haven't done well. I'm just not convinced that this is a good direction when it seems as though Chrysler hasn't figured this one out yet.
#12
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Georgia/East Florida
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
19 Posts
Junk! Why not just strike a deal with Hyundai and stick "Jeep" "Grand Cherokee" and "Trail Rated" badging on the Sante Fe. It'd be the same damn thing...
Personally (I think I've said this before, but humor me) I think the start of the bad trend was the Libery and it's IFS front. Then the catering to the soccer mom crowd and the IFS goes on the GC. Don't even get me started on the Patriot & Compass! Personally, I think the only good move since before even Daimler swallowed up Chrysler (and we saw how shrewed a move that was) was the 4 door Jeep Unlimited, but of course that vehicle would be unnecessary if the original Cherokee wasn't discontinued...
Personally (I think I've said this before, but humor me) I think the start of the bad trend was the Libery and it's IFS front. Then the catering to the soccer mom crowd and the IFS goes on the GC. Don't even get me started on the Patriot & Compass! Personally, I think the only good move since before even Daimler swallowed up Chrysler (and we saw how shrewed a move that was) was the 4 door Jeep Unlimited, but of course that vehicle would be unnecessary if the original Cherokee wasn't discontinued...
#13
And the liberty is selling well, unlike most all other SUVs. For the same price, or even less you get a REAL truck and it doesnt really give up THAT much mpg to the CUVs. Honda is bragging about the great mileage the pilot gets: 24 mpg hwy. A mutated fwd minivan should be getting at least 30mpg or its just pathetic. The whole idea behind CUVs is that they should be cheaper to buy and own than a traditional truck based SUV, the tradeoff is you give up a good part of the load carrying towing capacity and offroad capability. Well I see the reduced utility but not the savings.
If anyone is to focus on jacked up, conventional door minivans and high roof station wagons, it should be Dodge and not Jeep.
#14
Well, for the sake of accuracy the Liberty is a two-row SUV and the Pilot is a three-row jacked up, conventional door minivan (excuse me CUV) so the Commander would be the more accurate comparison. The truth is the two shouldn't be compared as they are in different classes. Also, the Pilot achieves 23 not 24 at this time which is the same as the Journey which is also a jacked up, conventional door minivan (whoops I mean CUV again).
If anyone is to focus on jacked up, conventional door minivans and high roof station wagons, it should be Dodge and not Jeep.
If anyone is to focus on jacked up, conventional door minivans and high roof station wagons, it should be Dodge and not Jeep.
How about the Saturn Vue? I saw one of those at a dealership where I was checking out a Mustang and I noticed that one of those with v-6 and AWD was rated at 24 hwy mpg. Still pathetic since thats no real savings over the liberty and it has none of the capability. And its no cheaper to buy.