Chrysler Badged Lancia
#1
#3
#4
those models are successful because they were all well known as performance vehicles...or at least i feel so. i have and enjoy my stratus (rebadged/rebodied 2000-20005 eclipse) and my laser (1st gen DSM) but they are sporty vehicles and the people who buy them are after them because theyre sporty...but a station wagon? Look at how badly it worked out for pontiac. almost all of their models were rebadged euro models and even though they got pretty good reviews, the company died.
#5
I'm REALLY getting a bad feeling about this whole Fiat thing. Chrysler needs to improve the current line up, not expand and try to be everything to everyone. This thing will further dilute the brand and besides, IT'S HIDEOUS! It seems that Fiat is trying to sell Fiats (or whatever crap brand) instead of Chryslers by dumping their european models into the line up. Hey Tony, at least try to make it look like a Chrysler!
#6
My thoughts are such. I HATE badge engineering. I absolutely positively hate it. If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times. WHEN I'M WANT TO BUY A CHRYSLER PRODUCT, I WANT A CHRYSLER PRODUCT!!! I don't want a Mitsubishi, a Mercedes, a Renault, nor a Fiat. I want and expect a Chrysler product.
This is one reason why I'm feeling less interested in their car line as they are either using a Mercedes or Mitsubishi platform for just about every model (except the Viper).
highrevr/tflea and 1 Bad Mirada, I have to respectfully disagree with you on the DSM point. The Laser's life was limited to a single generation despite it's performance and relative low cost for offering. Although the first year of the 2nd gen Talon was good, it ultimately failed as it died with Eagle after 1998 leaving the Eclipse to have one last year in that formula. You might have a case on the Stratus and Sebring but then again they no longer are offered anymore.
Although the Stealth was quite an impressive machine especially for its time, it only lasted 6 years on the market (three years shorter than the 3000GT's run). On top of this the other rebadged Mitsubishi models like the Summit/Colt did not sell all that well.
Also, take a look at Mercedes most recent attempts. The Crossfire was a right out failure in trying to offer inferior ten year old technology. Using the Mitsubishi platform on the Cloud Car replacements and the compact station wagons (excuse me "hatchbacks") has hardly been the success story that the Cloud cars, Neon, and PT Cruiser were.
Badge engineering simply doesn't work because people like me will not play along. The only hope they have to make it feel as much like a Chrysler as possible and pray that no one notices the difference, that means use a Chrysler engine, Chrysler transmission, Chrysler interior pieces, etc. That is what reduces the possibility of failure.
This is one reason why I'm feeling less interested in their car line as they are either using a Mercedes or Mitsubishi platform for just about every model (except the Viper).
highrevr/tflea and 1 Bad Mirada, I have to respectfully disagree with you on the DSM point. The Laser's life was limited to a single generation despite it's performance and relative low cost for offering. Although the first year of the 2nd gen Talon was good, it ultimately failed as it died with Eagle after 1998 leaving the Eclipse to have one last year in that formula. You might have a case on the Stratus and Sebring but then again they no longer are offered anymore.
Although the Stealth was quite an impressive machine especially for its time, it only lasted 6 years on the market (three years shorter than the 3000GT's run). On top of this the other rebadged Mitsubishi models like the Summit/Colt did not sell all that well.
Also, take a look at Mercedes most recent attempts. The Crossfire was a right out failure in trying to offer inferior ten year old technology. Using the Mitsubishi platform on the Cloud Car replacements and the compact station wagons (excuse me "hatchbacks") has hardly been the success story that the Cloud cars, Neon, and PT Cruiser were.
Badge engineering simply doesn't work because people like me will not play along. The only hope they have to make it feel as much like a Chrysler as possible and pray that no one notices the difference, that means use a Chrysler engine, Chrysler transmission, Chrysler interior pieces, etc. That is what reduces the possibility of failure.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I just want to see Chrysler return to making cars instead of becoming a retailer of other companies rejects and trash that Daimler attempted to transform it into and away from the innovative company who made great cars.