New Avenger gets not so glamorous review
#1
New Avenger gets not so glamorous review
#2
#3
#5
RE: New Avenger gets not so glamorous review
Remember this is also the outlet that thought the world of the crappy Chevrolet Malibu from 1997 and hated the 2000 Impala. I think they also prefered the Taurus to the Impala and Intrepid; therefore, they have no taste. The funny thing is the outlets are flip-flopping on that I4. Some say it is quite and smooth, others say its loud and unrefined. Its the same way with the new 62TE, some say its quick shifting, others say its slow. The I4 would be among the best in class if they would offer the 62TE with it. The problem is the competition offers 5-speeds which help utilitze the power better to offer better acceleration and better fuel economy.
Also an outlet that can't keep their engines straight should be the last to criticize someone else (the 2.7L is the DOHC and the 3.5L is the SOHC, not the other way around). Morons at Edmunds! I agree they didn't do enough on this model. Detuning the 3.5L was a huge mistake, but from what I think Car and Driver said it does 0-60 in 6.8 secs. It isn't the fastest but that isn't bad either. I hope they offer a more powerful engine before long. I like the styling. If Toyota or Honda had the "Chill Zone" they would be obsessed with it.
Also an outlet that can't keep their engines straight should be the last to criticize someone else (the 2.7L is the DOHC and the 3.5L is the SOHC, not the other way around). Morons at Edmunds! I agree they didn't do enough on this model. Detuning the 3.5L was a huge mistake, but from what I think Car and Driver said it does 0-60 in 6.8 secs. It isn't the fastest but that isn't bad either. I hope they offer a more powerful engine before long. I like the styling. If Toyota or Honda had the "Chill Zone" they would be obsessed with it.
#6
#7
RE: New Avenger gets not so glamorous review
It doesn't look as bad as when I first got a glimpse of it
Wierd part about that article is it looks like he wrote 90% of it ahead of time. He really says little other than the engines. 5-6 BS statements about SNL? Come on, sounds like he's writing for pop culture, not edmonds.
Trending Topics
#9