1st Gen Ram Tech '93 & older Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve 1993 Rams and older. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Edelbrock Performer vs stock 440 intake

  #1  
Old 03-17-2018, 12:13 PM
rickpilgrim's Avatar
rickpilgrim
rickpilgrim is offline
Amateur
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Edelbrock Performer vs stock 440 intake

im gathering parts for the 440 swap for the Dump Truck and seeing I already have the Comp cams XE256H cam and headman headers and my good 9006 Thermoquad is it worth it (Power wise) to spend the $255.00 and put a Performer 2191 intake manifold on this mild 440?
 

Last edited by rickpilgrim; 03-17-2018 at 12:16 PM.
  #2  
Old 03-17-2018, 01:53 PM
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
crazzywolfie is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orangeville ontario
Posts: 8,023
Received 71 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

i really don't see any advantage to running an aftermarket intake on a heavy work truck. a 4bbl intake is pretty much a 4bbl intake on a truck.
 
  #3  
Old 03-17-2018, 03:49 PM
rickpilgrim's Avatar
rickpilgrim
rickpilgrim is offline
Amateur
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You would not think that being a 5670 empty weight work truck that it’s needed but:

it’s geared deep, in the order of 4:10 or even 4:30ish and the TF 727 has the smaller torque converter for higher stall
AT 65 mph your turning 3-3100 rpm empty and loaded it’s more like 3400-3500 rpm (360 powered)
When we get landscape rock and fill or black dirt the hwy min speed limit is 60mph in 1/2 mile after ramp and I did get a traffic warning ticket for taking longer than the .5 mile

So I guess what I’m asking is Performer worth enough power over the stock to make it worthwhile?
 

Last edited by rickpilgrim; 03-17-2018 at 03:56 PM.
  #4  
Old 03-17-2018, 04:16 PM
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
crazzywolfie is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orangeville ontario
Posts: 8,023
Received 71 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

i don't see there being a huge performance difference. i would sooner keep the money and spend it on something like an aftermarket fuel injection setup than a intake. these trucks definitely don't make the greatest work trucks compared to some of the new ones when it comes to keeping up to traffic. they are extremely tough and do stuff i would never do in new trucks but just were built for old speed limits. i am kind of surprised it would have taken more than .5 miles to to get up to 60mph with 4.10 gears. i know usually once these engines hit about 2000rpm they start working and seem to really take off but sometimes the fuel injection helps them move better
 
  #5  
Old 03-17-2018, 04:43 PM
rickpilgrim's Avatar
rickpilgrim
rickpilgrim is offline
Amateur
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by crazzywolfie
i don't see there being a huge performance difference. i would sooner keep the money and spend it on something like an aftermarket fuel injection setup than a intake. these trucks definitely don't make the greatest work trucks compared to some of the new ones when it comes to keeping up to traffic. they are extremely tough and do stuff i would never do in new trucks but just were built for old speed limits. i am kind of surprised it would have taken more than .5 miles to to get up to 60mph with 4.10 gears. i know usually once these engines hit about 2000rpm they start working and seem to really take off but sometimes the fuel injection helps them move better
we were loaded with 2.25 yards of 1 1/2 inch landscape rock for a total of 14,378 lbs and on the uphill ramp with 2 more miles before level ground. The state patrol told me I would need red flags and 4 way lights on or find a different route,

We have a non efi 93 Chevy dually with OD automatic with a stroker 427 Truck engine(496) that has a comp cams 260H cam and Holley 650 carb that pulls that weight at 2400-2500rpm and a 98 Chevy crew cab that was 7.4 efi and is now 402 based stroker(434) that with cam/intake/headers puts that efi 7.4 to shame towing as it will hold OD gear even with the skid steer and attachments(13,531 lbs) that the efi 7.4 couldn’t.
Both of those engine were built at Robbie’s Machine shop and set up and tuned on his dyno.
That was almost $5000 per engine which I’m not doing this time.
That has convinced me no to think efi is a power adder but more of an ease of tuning thing.
 

Last edited by rickpilgrim; 03-17-2018 at 05:24 PM.
  #6  
Old 03-17-2018, 05:39 PM
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
crazzywolfie is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orangeville ontario
Posts: 8,023
Received 71 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

ah that would do it. almost sounds like you had the truck overweight by quite a bit if it was weighing in at that much.

but being carburated in not likely why the 93 puts the 98 to shame. it also has to do with how they are geared and tuned. also if you are towing any major amount of weight most manufactures recommend turning overdrive off. almost every time you run efi vs carb the efi usually comes out making more power and way simpler to get there since most of the setups are self learning. it is not always a ton more power but it is usually easier to get there.
 
  #7  
Old 03-17-2018, 06:15 PM
rickpilgrim's Avatar
rickpilgrim
rickpilgrim is offline
Amateur
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=crazzywolfie;3383787]ah that would do it. almost sounds like you had the truck overweight by quite a bit if it was weighing in at that much.

Last load of the day, just enough to finish the job and yes, around 2800 lbs over the gvw posted above the door.
what I,m saying both the carb motors that were dyno tuned are just as smooth but more powerful than either the OE diesel now gasoline 496 in the dually or the port efi 7.4 in the crew cab that is now a carb gas 20 cid less engine. All of my GM trucks are built 4L80E trans with 4.10 gears that are ok (per mfg)with towing in od
EFI is normally way easier to tune and yes, self learning and you can feel the difference in the but dyno over most old well worn not dyno tuned carb engines If you ever take a carb 360 truck and a 5.9 magnum truck the magnum feels way better but it’s 90% heads and more compression and efi for the smog police. Dyno tuning gave me the best tune you can get with a $600+ change invoice per engine and a so-so tbi is around $1000.00 and that doesn’t get you ignition control with knock sensor so I’m looking at +$2200 to do that, which is still tbi, to me a glorified carb.

With the 9006 Thermoquad which is already jetted for 440 I’m wondering if a Edelbrock Performer intake is worth 10-20hp and 20-30ft/lbs over the stock egr cast iron intake on the engine

 

Last edited by rickpilgrim; 03-18-2018 at 12:26 AM.
  #8  
Old 03-19-2018, 10:14 AM
rickpilgrim's Avatar
rickpilgrim
rickpilgrim is offline
Amateur
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Over the weekend i ordered the 2191 Performer intake on advice of the Mopar Guys in town. This is what they said:
“on a stock engine or up to 204 or 5 at .050 OE is fine, but when you get a little over that (cam size) you need more pleneum volume and your at 212. @ .050 where the stock intake will only be effective to 25-2700rpm. After that, your leaving more on the table and by 3500 rpm you’ve lost around 15 hp and 28 in torque or so”

Thanks everyone for your thoughts on this!
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Edelbrock Performer vs stock 440 intake



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.