looking for a little help from everyone.
#21
It's cool. When you have someone take your credit and goes out on a shopping spree leaving you to fend with the bill(s) you will see it in another view. Especially when it is thousands of dollars which is mere pennies to some.
Also, when a dealership or anyone running credit for that matter runs the credit with an agenciy or company, it sits on your credit report in the inquires section for 30 or more days. It also lessons your score when you do this frequently in a short time frame.
Also, when a dealership or anyone running credit for that matter runs the credit with an agenciy or company, it sits on your credit report in the inquires section for 30 or more days. It also lessons your score when you do this frequently in a short time frame.
And yes, every check of your credit goes on your file. That's why I don't have a Target, Walmart, Dodge, ... and every other credit card. I have a couple majors and that's it. But it's not that bad if you are doing it as necessary for legitimate reasons. If your score is constantly being checked because there are question, then that raises more questions. But if you are good with your credit, running it again for another car will make little difference. It should be the least of your concerns considering the lemon. Focus on what's important with this issue. Getting the car fixed, or getting out of the deal because it's a lemon.
#22
I guess in the end what I am looking to do is a switch out of the vehicles. In my looking through laws and paperwork, it is not unheard of.
I know the lemon law really well as I sued Chevy before for one. I am not trying to let this get that far. They made a good solid offer to me on getting into the 2014 with the EPD and transferring my lifetime warranty and whatnot, but I am worried that they are going to give me the shaft on the trade. I know everyone needs to make money and I am not really trying to ask way outside the box for anything.
I just think that since my contract started 38 days ago and nothing has been made payment wise by me and will not be until Sept that it would be easy for Chrysler or the owner of the dealership make a call or two to the lenders they are getting people auto loans from and ask to just switch out the vehicles. The pricing for the new model cannot be all that far off from what some of us paid for 2013 models.
Plus, for all the troubles I have had between the Journey and now the Durango, I would think Chrysler would thank me for not going after them twice legally and give me a decent discount. But if not then I guess I will have to do what I gotta do.
Thanks again everyone for your input.
I know the lemon law really well as I sued Chevy before for one. I am not trying to let this get that far. They made a good solid offer to me on getting into the 2014 with the EPD and transferring my lifetime warranty and whatnot, but I am worried that they are going to give me the shaft on the trade. I know everyone needs to make money and I am not really trying to ask way outside the box for anything.
I just think that since my contract started 38 days ago and nothing has been made payment wise by me and will not be until Sept that it would be easy for Chrysler or the owner of the dealership make a call or two to the lenders they are getting people auto loans from and ask to just switch out the vehicles. The pricing for the new model cannot be all that far off from what some of us paid for 2013 models.
Plus, for all the troubles I have had between the Journey and now the Durango, I would think Chrysler would thank me for not going after them twice legally and give me a decent discount. But if not then I guess I will have to do what I gotta do.
Thanks again everyone for your input.
#24
...
I just think that since my contract started 38 days ago and nothing has been made payment wise by me and will not be until Sept that it would be easy for Chrysler or the owner of the dealership make a call or two to the lenders they are getting people auto loans from and ask to just switch out the vehicles. The pricing for the new model cannot be all that far off from what some of us paid for 2013 models.
...
I just think that since my contract started 38 days ago and nothing has been made payment wise by me and will not be until Sept that it would be easy for Chrysler or the owner of the dealership make a call or two to the lenders they are getting people auto loans from and ask to just switch out the vehicles. The pricing for the new model cannot be all that far off from what some of us paid for 2013 models.
...
If you get out of this for less then 3K you will be lucky.
#25
My curiosity centers more around understanding the true root cause for this smoking issue. I can’t imagine all the Hemi owners in cities like, for example, San Francisco that park their cars on the hilly streets, having this smoking problem.
We heard oil in the intake being a possibility, thus the catch can, but, there shouldn’t be (that much) oil in the intake in the first place, just air and fuel, and in the case of direct injection, only air. I know, there is the PCV system to "re-inject" hydrocarbons from the valve covers back into the cylinders to reduce pollution.
I can imagine the car at a steep angle where the oil shifts to one end of the oil-pan and the crankshaft and rods for the 1st couple of pistons are submerged in the oil; I suppose this could end up getting oil into the combustion chamber when first starting the engine, resulting in the burning oil. I guess an improved baffle design in the oil pan could address the issue. Otherwise, the other solution may be to convert to a dry sump system.
One of the most important aspect of the design is for the oil pump’s pickup feature to be always immersed in the oil, under various steep angles, so proper lubrication of the engine takes place.
We heard oil in the intake being a possibility, thus the catch can, but, there shouldn’t be (that much) oil in the intake in the first place, just air and fuel, and in the case of direct injection, only air. I know, there is the PCV system to "re-inject" hydrocarbons from the valve covers back into the cylinders to reduce pollution.
I can imagine the car at a steep angle where the oil shifts to one end of the oil-pan and the crankshaft and rods for the 1st couple of pistons are submerged in the oil; I suppose this could end up getting oil into the combustion chamber when first starting the engine, resulting in the burning oil. I guess an improved baffle design in the oil pan could address the issue. Otherwise, the other solution may be to convert to a dry sump system.
One of the most important aspect of the design is for the oil pump’s pickup feature to be always immersed in the oil, under various steep angles, so proper lubrication of the engine takes place.
#26
#27
detailsbyFrank, it looks like you've had 2 lemons in the past - a Chevy vehicle and a Dodge Journey? And now you may possibly have another one? This is not the usual run rate, but I would really be extra careful in choosing your next vehicle (hopefully soon). Maybe the pros here can give advice in avoiding these situations. Hope you get things in order with the dealer!
#28
I'd give the company three opportunities to fix the problem and then go the lemon law route. You have film showing the problem and they've tried twice to correct it, so there is NO dispute that a problem exists. IMHO Chrysler -- not the dealership -- should give you a new truck and eat the costs. I wonder what the price difference between a barely used stock 2013 and a new stock 2014. Whatever it is it's chump change to Chrysler.
#29
I'd give the company three opportunities to fix the problem and then go the lemon law route. You have film showing the problem and they've tried twice to correct it, so there is NO dispute that a problem exists. IMHO Chrysler -- not the dealership -- should give you a new truck and eat the costs. I wonder what the price difference between a barely used stock 2013 and a new stock 2014. Whatever it is it's chump change to Chrysler.