1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

3.9 or 5.2 Which way to go.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-17-2009, 03:37 PM
khbeo's Avatar
khbeo
khbeo is offline
Amateur
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3.9 or 5.2 Which way to go.

Got the computer replaced and the truck (96 3.9 Ext Cab 4x4, Automatic) is running great other than the oil smoke coming from the tail pipe now.

Looks like the oil rings are shot, with just over 50k miles on the motor. So here is where I am... rebuild the lower end, change a few things, ie the Cam, rocker arms. Or do I just say screw the 3.9 and drop a 5.2 in her.

The question is how much do I have to change over when moving to the 318? And does the cost worth it?
 
  #2  
Old 09-17-2009, 04:25 PM
skyshark186's Avatar
skyshark186
skyshark186 is offline
Captain
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If the cost is worth it or not is up to you. See if you can find a dakota with a 5.2 at a dealer and drive it. That would give you an idea if it feels like something you want or not.

There are several swap threads here available in the faq, or by search. You will most likely want a new transmission from behind a v8 as well as the motor/harness changes. THats covered in those threads.
 
  #3  
Old 09-17-2009, 05:57 PM
Crazy4x4RT's Avatar
Crazy4x4RT
Crazy4x4RT is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NM
Posts: 10,926
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

If you have the time I would say do the V8 swap. Check the FAQ2 for links to several posts on it with full details.
 
  #4  
Old 09-17-2009, 06:42 PM
95_318SLT's Avatar
95_318SLT
95_318SLT is offline
Champion
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 4,842
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I also agree do a v8 swap. You're talking about just a little worse gas milage for a huge power increase. The two big things you need to worry about are wiring in the extra 2 fuel injectors (or just getting a v8 wiring harness), and either building up your 42rh transmission with performance clutches and a shift kit or finding a 46rh. Everything else is plug and play.
 
  #5  
Old 09-18-2009, 12:25 AM
dodgerules86's Avatar
dodgerules86
dodgerules86 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sycamore, Illinois (displaced to Arkansas)
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

V-8 swap.
The V-8 usually gets about the same MPG as the V-6, but, like 95_318SLT said, much more power!
As 95_318SLT also said, you will need a V8 computer, and either (A) the V8 engine wiring harness or (B) just run the wires to the "extra" two injectors.
As far as the transmission, you *can* stick with the automatic running behind the V6 (42RE, not 42RH, since you have a 1996) and it will work as long as you don't plan on doing much upgrades and getting on it all the time (a Gen 2 owner is running the V6 trans behind the V8). Ideally, since you'll have everything ripped out if you swap to a V8, you should just swap to the 46RE.
 
  #6  
Old 09-18-2009, 05:27 PM
khbeo's Avatar
khbeo
khbeo is offline
Amateur
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re

Went out looking on the web and found a 95 Dakota motor and trans for 1400 close by the house. I called and the guy saids it runs with 114k, so look like I have a trip to take.

Thanks for the info. Will post what I find.
 
  #7  
Old 09-19-2009, 02:37 AM
dodgerules86's Avatar
dodgerules86
dodgerules86 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sycamore, Illinois (displaced to Arkansas)
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Just a little note:
The wiring harness is different for 1995 and 1996. 1996 implemented OBDII.

For the COMPUTER:
1995- one 60-pin connector.
1996- three 32-pin connectors
 




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 AM.