1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Help! '91 Dodge Dakota 4x4 3.9 no spark

Old Apr 18, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #11  
Sunnysky's Avatar
Sunnysky
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default No sparks Dakota.

Have you figured out what the problem is?
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #12  
volaredon's Avatar
volaredon
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by bwdakrt
Your truck definitely doesn't have a carb but as stated before it has TBI injection. Those 2 round thing you see in the top of the throttle body are fuel injectors.

You have a crank position sensor on the back of the engine on the passenger side where the bell housing connects to the engine and the cam position sensor is inside the dist cap...the flat round disc with the 2 wires attached.

Crank Position Sensor





Cam Position Sensor
No no crank sensor on TBI engines those didnt start til the magnum engines in 92
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2012 | 12:18 PM
  #13  
Sunnysky's Avatar
Sunnysky
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default No sparks.

Mine has the same problem, so far I've changed the crank sensor, distributor's cap & rotor & coil but still no sparks. All splices are checked, now waiting for the camshaft sensor (pickup coil) from the autopart store. Not sure if it, camshaft's, will fix the problem. Mine is 93 dakota, 95000 mile.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2012 | 06:15 PM
  #14  
volaredon's Avatar
volaredon
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 50
Default

I just went thru a hair pulling escapade that wound up being a bad TPS on my wife's XJ Cherokee last fall; it never failed to start but it was doing all kind of weird stuff;
About the 2nd thing that I replaced early on was the TPS; no change in symptoms or voltage rfeadings; whether by scanner or multimeter/back probing; so 2 different computers 2 JY wiring harness and 6 months later it wound up the 1st TPS that I installed was bad as well. I kept saying "can't be" because I had changed it once already, and chased my tail all around that stupid sensor and wound up replacing it for the 2nd time and no probems since.

Now I'm not saying that I think your problem in this case is the TPS; (it wont cause a no start; itll start with the TPS unhooked but it wont run right))
but what I AM saying is that just because you replaced it dont mean you got a good part to replace it with; got a scanner?
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2012 | 09:50 PM
  #15  
Sunnysky's Avatar
Sunnysky
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

I'm wondering about the crankshaft sensor I replaced. The new part looks a little shorter than the original one. I am't sure will make any different? It looks and fits right in but a little shorter. Any suggestion?
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 11:07 AM
  #16  
adrielkelsick's Avatar
adrielkelsick
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

The problem was a roasted computer.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 01:05 PM
  #17  
Sunnysky's Avatar
Sunnysky
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

adrielkelsick;2769653]The problem was a roasted computer


Any recommend for place to buy new PCM, I'll try that route?
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 05:31 AM
  #18  
JR318's Avatar
JR318
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Upstate South Carolina
Default

[QUOTE=Sunnysky;2769458]I'm wondering about the crankshaft sensor I replaced. The new part looks a little shorter than the original one.

If the new sensor is shorter than there is a good chance it will not read properly. The sensor is a halleffect switch the reads on off on off etc. If the new one is to short it will not read at all. You should be able to test the new one to make sure it is reading with a digital meter. When you test it you will have to back probe the wires( not sure what two wires the are without looking at a schematic) with the key on and slowly rotate the engine. It should read no voltage then around 5 volts then 0 volts then 5 volts again.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 01:35 PM
  #19  
Sunnysky's Avatar
Sunnysky
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for your suggestion, I'll check out.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 09:57 PM
  #20  
volaredon's Avatar
volaredon
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 50
Default

are we sure the truck is a '91? If it is it should not even HAVE a crank sensor! Or is it an early 92 with a production date in late 91?? Just because the truck was built in calender year '91, dont mean it is a 91 model;
91 should be an "LA" series engine with TBI.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM.