dakota tranny
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: ontario, canada
dakota tranny
Hi I am looking for information on tranny identification numbers
the numbers are pk52117685 1367 2734. I believe it to be a 46 rh but just want to verify it by the numbers. If there is anyone that could help or point me where I cna find this information it would be greatly appreciated
the numbers are pk52117685 1367 2734. I believe it to be a 46 rh but just want to verify it by the numbers. If there is anyone that could help or point me where I cna find this information it would be greatly appreciated
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,923
Likes: 19
From: NM
I think you can brake down the part numbers by using the service manual in the FAQ. Or your local dealer can help with that. Also the FAQ has list of the transmissions by year and engines.
You didn't say what engine you have, for 96 V8 is 46RE, V6 is 42RE. If your looking for a replacement only 4wd will work for you.
You didn't say what engine you have, for 96 V8 is 46RE, V6 is 42RE. If your looking for a replacement only 4wd will work for you.
Champion
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 5
From: Sycamore, Illinois (displaced to Arkansas)
52117685
It's an A518 (46RH).
It came with the 5.2L engines in 1993, up to build date 10-1-1992. This is per the parts manual.
I could give you a build date (that's the 1367) but Chrysler is mentally challenged with numbers. Apparently it would be too hard to use 93001, or 3001 to signify January 1, 1993 (using a Julian Date format, 001 being January 1, 365 being December 31). Instead they have a nonsensical 10,000 day format, OR a Julian Date format that makes no sense. Go figure. The company can't build transmissions right, and can't figure out a date-stamp system that makes sense.
It's an A518 (46RH).
It came with the 5.2L engines in 1993, up to build date 10-1-1992. This is per the parts manual.
I could give you a build date (that's the 1367) but Chrysler is mentally challenged with numbers. Apparently it would be too hard to use 93001, or 3001 to signify January 1, 1993 (using a Julian Date format, 001 being January 1, 365 being December 31). Instead they have a nonsensical 10,000 day format, OR a Julian Date format that makes no sense. Go figure. The company can't build transmissions right, and can't figure out a date-stamp system that makes sense.
Last edited by dodgerules86; Sep 14, 2011 at 06:41 PM.
52117685
It's an A518 (46RH).
It came with the 5.2L engines in 1993, up to build date 10-1-1992. This is per the parts manual.
I could give you a build date (that's the 1367) but Chrysler is mentally challenged with numbers. Apparently it would be too hard to use 93001, or 3001 to signify January 1, 1993 (using a Julian Date format, 001 being January 1, 365 being December 31). Instead they have a nonsensical 10,000 day format, OR a Julian Date format that makes no sense. Go figure. The company can't build transmissions right, and can't figure out a date-stamp system that makes sense.
It's an A518 (46RH).
It came with the 5.2L engines in 1993, up to build date 10-1-1992. This is per the parts manual.
I could give you a build date (that's the 1367) but Chrysler is mentally challenged with numbers. Apparently it would be too hard to use 93001, or 3001 to signify January 1, 1993 (using a Julian Date format, 001 being January 1, 365 being December 31). Instead they have a nonsensical 10,000 day format, OR a Julian Date format that makes no sense. Go figure. The company can't build transmissions right, and can't figure out a date-stamp system that makes sense.
