1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

upgrades ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 08:49 PM
  #11  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

If it truly does weigh 3084lbs I can maybe see that, my truck would knock on 20MPG freeway weighing a good 1300lbs more.
Originally Posted by AZ 360 Dakota
You may have noticed a low end difference in swapping to the 360 ECU but you are still wasting gas. I have wide band O2 readings between the two computers. The 360 is programmed to use more fuel for the larger displacement engine. The computer can compensate some but I guarantee your fuel trims are pegged rich.
.
FWIW I ran a Mopar 5.9 PCM on my 5.2 for a long time and never noticed any fuel mileage change, and the wideband did not read rich either.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 09:07 PM
  #12  
volaredon's Avatar
volaredon
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 50
Default

I get a solid 20 MPG from my 93 318 Clubcab Dakota that I converted to a 5 speed manual NV 3500 trans, a stock 94 318 manual trans computer and 3.55 gearing (I have a Sure Grip here that I have yet to install) and that's with shorty headers a TB Spacer (put on by PO so I wasnt the one that wasted any money on that paperweight/ but it was already there so I left it be)
and that's with a known-bad plenum gasket too.
The worst I have seen from this truck so far has been 17 MPG; coincidentally also the best I have ever gotten, out of my other Dakota; a 94 reg cab/shortbed w/a 6 cyl and auto trans; all stock except I removed the cat
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 09:27 PM
  #13  
dakotakid17's Avatar
dakotakid17
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Default

i was confused at first two so i asked a professorial mechanic/ dyno lab owner he said the the onley thing that made sense to him is that cause my truck is gutted i have a 5speed 2wd tranny and the 4wd rear end with 390s for gears that my truck dosent have to struggle at all to move its self. but thats what he said idk if that makes any sense to you guys. and my truck is a reg cab short bed as well.
 

Last edited by dakotakid17; Sep 14, 2012 at 09:44 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 12:31 AM
  #14  
T.C.'s Avatar
T.C.
Professional
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 233
Likes: 1
From: Calgary Alberta
Default

All I can say is lol. Also I didn't realize that a mechanic is a professor. :-P All kidding beside I would suggest internal upgrades like cam change or stroke it, there is also a very good article on car craft to hotrod these little engines for about 3500 bucks. I suggest to view it, it doesn't hurt.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 05:14 AM
  #15  
JR318's Avatar
JR318
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Upstate South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by T.C.
All I can say is lol. Also I didn't realize that a mechanic is a professor. :-P All kidding beside I would suggest internal upgrades like cam change or stroke it, there is also a very good article on car craft to hotrod these little engines for about 3500 bucks. I suggest to view it, it doesn't hurt.
Do you have a link to the article?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 07:23 AM
  #16  
95slt's Avatar
95slt
Professional
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

if same article I am thinking about I have it printed off somewhere...360 magnum - wish they kept it fuel injected though
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 09:08 AM
  #17  
JGC403's Avatar
JGC403
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 257
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by AZ 360 Dakota
There is NO WAY you are getting 24 MPG in a 5.2 Dakota, unless all you have is a seat bolted to a frame. It's a 3500 to 4000 lb truck with a not very efficient engine.
I was getting 22mpg driving cross country with the 3.9, 5 speed, 4x4. I don't see why he can't be getting that kind of mileage.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 09:11 AM
  #18  
JGC403's Avatar
JGC403
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 257
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by T.C.
there is also a very good article on car craft to hotrod these little engines for about 3500 bucks. I suggest to view it, it doesn't hurt.
This article?

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng...e/viewall.html
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 09:50 AM
  #19  
keilkravec's Avatar
keilkravec
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

All kidding aside, it does actually make sense for mileage Close to that, 24 in my opinion might be a little exaggerated but above 20 I can believe, with it being gutted a good few hundred pounds and being a stick with high rear gears, not to mention a short cab short bed, it's not that heavy of a truck to begin with.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 12:14 PM
  #20  
T.C.'s Avatar
T.C.
Professional
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 233
Likes: 1
From: Calgary Alberta
Default

Ya sorry for the wait there guys, haven't been near a computer for the whole weekend. Getting back to it, ya they aren't using a EFI, though that doesn't really have to stop us eh. Here is the article also thanks for finding another article on the subject JGC.

http://www.carcraft.com/projectbuild...e/viewall.html

Also you could always check the good old youtube, to see what other dakotas are running.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.