1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

Is my 5.9 durango supposed to be this slow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 09:26 AM
  #11  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

indy . . . lmfao
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 09:32 AM
  #12  
Dans01Durango's Avatar
Dans01Durango
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 4
From: NY NY
Default

Originally Posted by IndyDurango
I think the 5.2, 5.9 and 4.7 all have sludge problems. Dodge engines are well know for sludge battles.

:-0

IndyD
AHAHAHAHA!!! I think shrps almost had an anuerism before he realized you were joking, Indy!
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #13  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

Originally Posted by IndyDurango
I think the 5.2, 5.9 and 4.7 all have sludge problems. Dodge engines are well know for sludge battles.

:-0

IndyD
I can't believe you said that, now we'll be getting Google hits again like crazy!
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #14  
samnbensdad's Avatar
samnbensdad
Captain
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

LMAO... I knew as soon as I saw the word sludge in the first post that this was going get interesting!
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #15  
kgaul01's Avatar
kgaul01
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

thanks for the input guys. Did the full tune-up and it is still a bit slower than i expected i did hitch a boat to it recently and felt like it wasnt even back there. I now understand what this engine/gearing set up was designed for.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #16  
AndrewH's Avatar
AndrewH
Rookie
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

My personal experience:

2002 Durango 5.9L = towing bulldog, but crappy racer
I'm also comparing it to my 2000 Camaro SS , so the Durango had nothing on "speed" but could pull my house down the block.

5.9L = 245 HP/335 lb-fr
5.2L = 230 HP/300 lb-ft
4.7L = 235 HP/295 lb-ft

Relatively low compared to smaller displacements from other manufacturers (hell even the 5.7L Hemi = 335 HP/375 lb-ft).

But keep in mind, they have a tow rating just under the 1/2 ton Ram trucks for a "small SUV".

Their weight is another major factor.

As mentioned above, full tune-up should help, but also consider the other typical bolt-on upgrades (headers, CAI, etc.).

Another area to make some good gains is installing electric fans .
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 10:38 PM
  #17  
rebelboy's Avatar
rebelboy
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: carver,ma
Default

Way gears do you have
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 01:41 AM
  #18  
rebelboy's Avatar
rebelboy
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: carver,ma
Default

Sorry what gears do you have I went from 392 to355 I looked every wer I finally found 392 in a925 at the local bone yard
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 02:03 AM
  #19  
TCMaster's Avatar
TCMaster
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Talking

Originally Posted by AndrewH
5.9L = towing bulldog, but crappy racer
Isn't the 5.9 the fastest of the engines?
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 09:52 AM
  #20  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

5.9 is the biggest, torqueist(is that a word) and most powerful of the 3 offered, so off the line yes, in a sense, but all that power and torque is made low in the rpm range so its not as quick in the top end
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 PM.