1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

Still can't diagnose vibration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2013 | 06:49 PM
  #11  
AppelH's Avatar
AppelH
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Central Washington
Default

I may have found out that I don't have the PCM for the 5.2. If someone could decode these numbers that would be great.

P56040 407AD-I have all the numbers on the sticker but I am pretty sure this is the one that is needed.
On the block it says: 53006714 31824
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 09:03 PM
  #12  
volaredon's Avatar
volaredon
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 50
Default

by 2000 they weighted the flexplate instead of the torque converter. 46 RE used same torque converter with both engines. older ones (pre 96 I think was the change) they both used the same flexplate and different converters between those engines.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #13  
volaredon's Avatar
volaredon
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 50
Default

the PCM don't actually know what engine its running,,, that's NOT your issue
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 09:13 PM
  #14  
AppelH's Avatar
AppelH
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Central Washington
Default

OK... So both the points you just made are consistent with comments made when I asked the same question on the ram forum, which is good. Do you have any ideas? Do you think the weighted flex plate might be the problem?
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2013 | 07:27 PM
  #15  
vako's Avatar
vako
Professional
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 157
Likes: 2
Default

2 things, if vibration is gone while standing still, i would say wheel bearing, if vibration still exists when ur parked i would say spark plugs
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2013 | 07:35 PM
  #16  
AppelH's Avatar
AppelH
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Central Washington
Default

It is present, but less severe while stopped. The guys on the ram boards have helped me determine that I have a weighted flex plate that the 5.2 should not have.
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2013 | 12:12 AM
  #17  
adukart's Avatar
adukart
Record Breaker
10 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 41
From: Bismarck, ND
Default

Well what did the 5.2l come out of? If it was from a ram then it was in front of a 46re already. If it was from a dak/durango it was in front of a 44re. Its sounds like a balancing issue. The flex plate should not have been changed out, the 46re should have bolted up with out an issue.
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2013 | 12:37 AM
  #18  
AppelH's Avatar
AppelH
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Central Washington
Default

Don't know what the motor came out of. They could have reused the original flex plate, which is what I think happened. They don't know they switched from a 360 to a 318, I have come to the conclusion that they put a 318 in thinking that was the original motor size. I found the weight in question, I pulled the inspection cover off and I took pictures of it. They are all on the thread I made in the 2nd Gen ram forums, I don't know how to link to it on my phone.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.