2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

Hey all. Yep, another noob in need of some advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 08:52 AM
  #11  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Originally Posted by wink2873
10,419 with at least 200k on the allpar 200,000 mile club. my 88 dak is in there somewhere with over 250k.


http://www.allpar.com/old/club/searc....9&type=engine
Ha dude half the people on that site had to replace the motor or lifters or timing belts... I mean regardless, 200+ is impressive, but half the people on there replaced it before then.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #12  
wink2873's Avatar
wink2873
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 4
From: Norwalk, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by bpark8824
so happy to have the 4.7.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #13  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

haha im gay because I have a good motor... makes sense.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #14  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

all of the motors in these trucks are good, the 3.9/5.2/5.9 have just had more time to be proved good, the 4.7 has only been around since 2000(at least in these trucks) so still waiting for time to give us more good hard evidence of how long they last.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #15  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

I had so many things go wrong with my 3.9 i would never consider it a good motor, but its just my experience, if a lot of people you guys know had good experience with it, I can see why you guys would consider it a good motor in your eyes. But from the amount of problems I have (and I take care of my stuff) and the problems friends have had, I wouldn't ever say it was a good motor.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 10:06 PM
  #16  
usmrocks's Avatar
usmrocks
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: mississippi
Default

be nice to your 3.9 and it'll be nice to you, got over 130k problem free miles and wouldn't hesitate to drive it anywhere, minus offroad and such being a 2wd
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 10:19 PM
  #17  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

I was very nice to my 3.9 and i guess it just didn't like me.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #18  
usmrocks's Avatar
usmrocks
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: mississippi
Default

i'm 19 but i like to think i treated it nice haha and i still take it to atl. and my gdads across the state
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 10:55 PM
  #19  
95_318SLT's Avatar
95_318SLT
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,839
Likes: 5
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by TheePlaymaker
the numbers on the door though are for that size which is usually 235's i just go with 40 psi in my 31x10.50's which a lot of daks have on them
If you have a bigger tire than what the factory pressure rating is rated for, you will want to go with less pressure. The sum of the tire pressures times the area of the footprint of each tire should equal the weight of the truck, so if it has a bigger footprint you won't need as much pressure (but not much less, like maybe about 1 to 3 psi)
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 12:35 AM
  #20  
coloradovr6's Avatar
coloradovr6
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

So I would want to go with 27-30 psi for the bigger tires even though it makes them look low? I appreciate all of the advice I am getting but it seems like there isn't one real answer. I hear to keep them at 35 like the door says, some say to do it at 40 and some say do it lower like 27.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 AM.