2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

Testing: Gas Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 12:12 AM
  #11  
beefjerky's Avatar
beefjerky
Professional
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MadisonDakota
That would be 100% gas.

Haha, man I must've been tired when I posted, I totally missed that.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 12:29 AM
  #12  
MadisonDakota's Avatar
MadisonDakota
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by beefjerky
Haha, man I must've been tired when I posted, I totally missed that.
it's alright bro.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 11:20 PM
  #13  
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 2
From: Willow Street, PA
Default

wind is a huge factor too...i regularly get 1-3 mpg better going home from school then i do going to school i think the winds go south down the susqhuehanna or something haha
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 11:24 PM
  #14  
MadisonDakota's Avatar
MadisonDakota
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheePlaymaker
wind is a huge factor too...i regularly get 1-3 mpg better going home from school then i do going to school i think the winds go south down the susqhuehanna or something haha
Yep, they do. I am not going to measure the wind before each test, but I will try not to do them during a tornado. If they seem too skewed, I will re run them.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #15  
Pbadgley's Avatar
Pbadgley
Amateur
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: NB Canada
Default

Has anybody ever tested under-drive pulleys. I have tested my 99 3.9 2wd both before and after. Mind you there may be other factors such as weather and road conditions. I did use my odometer and gas receipt to manually calculate the results. I went from 18.3 mpg to 19.5 mpg. Has anybody else seen these increases in mileage with under-drive pulleys.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 09:52 PM
  #16  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

I've heard they do make a difference. They free up power which always results in higher mpg. So it makes perfect sense.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 09:57 PM
  #17  
MadisonDakota's Avatar
MadisonDakota
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pbadgley
Has anybody ever tested under-drive pulleys. I have tested my 99 3.9 2wd both before and after. Mind you there may be other factors such as weather and road conditions. I did use my odometer and gas receipt to manually calculate the results. I went from 18.3 mpg to 19.5 mpg. Has anybody else seen these increases in mileage with under-drive pulleys.
Doesn't seem entirely impossible, so yeah.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 10:16 PM
  #18  
MadisonDakota's Avatar
MadisonDakota
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

I ran the 3 speed tests today. All three went phenomenally.

65mph: A:23.7 B:23.3 Avg: 23.50
75mph: A:19.7 B:19.1 Avg: 19.40
55mph: A:28.6 B:27.5 Avg: 28.05

The 55mph had a little inconstancy because of a guy cutting me off on the B run. I didn't have time to redo it.


Test went as follows: Accelerate up to speed, set cruise at X speed, clear overhead computer, run till exit I was using to turn around one , record MPG (while still on cruise). The road was kind of hilly, but I ran A going west on the road, and B going east. Gasoline was Route 66's 100% gasoline 87 octane. Truck was loaded with 2 people, total weight 385, along with 50 pounds of cargo. Truck bed cover was on, clutch fan was off. Ambient air temperature was 56 degrees. The front tires had 35 PSI of air, filled before the drive.

* I think I have covered everything? Like I have said earlier in this thread, I am NOT saying that the overhead computer is 100% accurate for actual MPG. But, it does show a pretty noticeable difference at speed.

I am going on a 6 hour trip this weekend, I am going to run 65 the whole time and see if I get somewhere near what this test shows.
 

Last edited by MadisonDakota; Mar 8, 2010 at 10:21 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 08:02 AM
  #19  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

So how far did you drive for these tests?
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 08:45 AM
  #20  
MadisonDakota's Avatar
MadisonDakota
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bpark8824
So how far did you drive for these tests?
Around 7.5 miles, so 15 for each test. My tires are OEM size, and a little worn, so the numbers may be off a little bit, but like I said...I'm measuring the differences, not the actual numbers.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 PM.