2000 dodge dakota 3.9L
but budget mpg gains... hmm i went with a kn air filter in the stock air box, and bosch platnium +4's spark plugs. just that combination i noticed a difference, id estimate roughly 2-3 mpg. the motor was a lot more responsive.
i still have to replace the cap and rotor, and ignition coil. im also doing a bunch of other small mods on the motor that are outlined on my thread, and on my personal website.
feel free to PM me if you have any questions.. i am doing a frame off restoration and customization so im going through it all, and on a budget
I was thinking of putting a short-ram instead of a cold air intake sense cold air intake actually makes you use more fuel and my rig has like 135000 or so on it which is around normal for the year and i put a specture filter the k&n's cheaper brother lol but i havn't done a tune up yet it needs it but i am getting around 15.5 to 16mpg its mostly city type driving where i am at just wanting to get better lol
You win the fuel mileage race. Either you put a 5 speed behind that 3.9, you're shutting off and coasting, you never open the throttle blades, or you're going off the overhead computer (subtract 2 if so)....
I think the best city I've seen on here out of a 3.9 is 14-15. I get closer to 11 city/19 hwy but I'm modded.
Last edited by magnethead; Dec 11, 2012 at 01:09 PM.
O.O
You win the fuel mileage race. Either you put a 5 speed behind that 3.9, you're shutting off and coasting, you never open the throttle blades, or you're going off the overhead computer (subtract 2 if so)....
I think the best city I've seen on here out of a 3.9 is 14-15. I get closer to 11 city/19 hwy but I'm modded.
You win the fuel mileage race. Either you put a 5 speed behind that 3.9, you're shutting off and coasting, you never open the throttle blades, or you're going off the overhead computer (subtract 2 if so)....
I think the best city I've seen on here out of a 3.9 is 14-15. I get closer to 11 city/19 hwy but I'm modded.
ive done the math.. i average 16/17 city, and 20/22 highway... my truck is lighter than hell.. stock 2000 dak weights about 4500, mine weighs 3950
I'm not doubting your math, just saying I don't get great mileage because of what I've done to my truck lol
Trending Topics

I think he said he's done the math because I said the overhead computer reads 2mpg high on average due to the tank sending unit mismatch error.
fuel / distance traveled = mpg
its a rough number, but its viable the average i got was somehere around 17.3 mpg
belive me tho, that number will be goin down.. based on im puttin 31's on it, a 4 inch body and 2 in suspension lift.
well heres the thing, my truck has no steel bed on it. it has only a 120 lb bed on it. and then the math was done, i did it based off this equasion.
fuel / distance traveled = mpg
its a rough number, but its viable the average i got was somehere around 17.3 mpg
belive me tho, that number will be goin down.. based on im puttin 31's on it, a 4 inch body and 2 in suspension lift.
fuel / distance traveled = mpg
its a rough number, but its viable the average i got was somehere around 17.3 mpg
belive me tho, that number will be goin down.. based on im puttin 31's on it, a 4 inch body and 2 in suspension lift.
That's the same eqn we all use, once you put the 31's on it'll tank hard if you have the 3.55's in back. I have 29.5's (265/65-16) and I'm with 4.10's already, albeit for racing and not fuel economy :P plus SCT, rockers, ect. And I'm not even close to done yet.






