2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

upper control arm bolt torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 04:17 PM
  #1  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Thread Starter
|
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 183
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default upper control arm bolt torque

been arguing with 2 firestones, finally called and made a complaint and was told to come to a third store. Manager seemed somewhat nice.

Problem is that control arms have been collapsing. Took a torque wrench, figured out that the alignment nuts haven't been getting tightened much past hand tight. I took them to 165 ft-lb. Anybody know what the true spec is? Factory alignment spec is +3 degrees caster, -0.25 degrees camber, +0.1 degree toe on page 2-5.

edit- found it 155 ft lbs, page 2-7 and 2-14 of the manual.
 

Last edited by magnethead; Oct 20, 2014 at 04:21 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 10:47 PM
  #2  
98DAKAZ's Avatar
98DAKAZ
Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,895
Likes: 35
From: Gilbert, Arizona
Default

155 ft lbs. that's it

That can explain why your alignment has been going out on you

In 16 years my alignment never dropped or needed done only reason I finally got it done was new bushings and ball joints.


TORQUE CHART


DESCRIPTION TORQUE

Shock Absorber



Upper Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 N·m (19 ft. lbs.)

Lower Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 N·m (21 ft. lbs.)


Lower Suspension Arm



Front Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 N·m (130 ft. lbs.)

Rear Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 N·m (80 ft. lbs.)

Ball Joint Nut . . . . . . . . . . . 127 N·m (94 ft. lbs.)


Upper Suspension Arm



Pivot Shaft Nuts . . . . . . . . 167 N·m (130 ft. lbs.)

Pivot Shaft to Frame Nuts . 210 N·m (155 ft. lbs.)

Ball Joint Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 N·m (60 ft. lbs.)


Stabilizer Bar



Link Upper Nut . . . . . . . . . . . 37 N·m (27 ft. lbs.)

Link Ball Stud Nut . . . . . . . . 47 N·m (35 ft. lbs.)

Retainer Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 N·m (45 ft. lbs.)


Hub/Bearing



Spindle Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 N·m (185 ft. lbs.)
 

Last edited by 98DAKAZ; Oct 20, 2014 at 10:52 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2020 | 09:31 PM
  #3  
Wayne Gribble's Avatar
Wayne Gribble
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default Are these specs for 2003 dodge dakota? Upper control arm

Are these specs for a 2003 dodge dakota upper control arm?



That can explain why your alignment has been going out on you

In 16 years my alignment never dropped or needed done only reason I finally got it done was new bushings and ball joints.


TORQUE CHART


DESCRIPTION TORQUE

Shock Absorber



Upper Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 N·m (19 ft. lbs.)

Lower Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 N·m (21 ft. lbs.)


Lower Suspension Arm



Front Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 N·m (130 ft. lbs.)

Rear Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 N·m (80 ft. lbs.)

Ball Joint Nut . . . . . . . . . . . 127 N·m (94 ft. lbs.)


Upper Suspension Arm



Pivot Shaft Nuts . . . . . . . . 167 N·m (130 ft. lbs.)

Pivot Shaft to Frame Nuts . 210 N·m (155 ft. lbs.)

Ball Joint Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 N·m (60 ft. lbs.)


Stabilizer Bar



Link Upper Nut . . . . . . . . . . . 37 N·m (27 ft. lbs.)

Link Ball Stud Nut . . . . . . . . 47 N·m (35 ft. lbs.)

Retainer Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 N·m (45 ft. lbs.)


Hub/Bearing



Spindle Nut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 N·m (185 ft. lbs.)[/QUOTE]
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2020 | 11:06 PM
  #4  
98DAKAZ's Avatar
98DAKAZ
Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,895
Likes: 35
From: Gilbert, Arizona
Default

Should be I know from 97 to 2004 they all used the same control arms.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2020 | 05:16 PM
  #5  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Thread Starter
|
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 183
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 98DAKAZ
Should be I know from 97 to 2004 they all used the same control arms.
Control arms are not quite the same. Tiebars are different on 00+
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2020 | 08:07 PM
  #6  
volaredon's Avatar
volaredon
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 50
Default

Ive never put a torque wrench on those in my life but aligned lots of those trucks when I was an alignment guy..... tightening tool of choice was usually a breaker bar. sometimes an air impact.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.