2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Overrated cat's = less restriction?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 11:56 AM
  #1  
Ugly1's Avatar
Ugly1
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 18
Default Overrated cat's = less restriction?

Howdy,

I'm looking through the Magnaflow 99000 series of catalytic converters, 3 inch in and out if you are curious. What I've noticed are that some models are compatible with higher engine displacements than other models.

Is it safe to assume that higher engine displacement compatible cats are always higher flow than the similar cats with smaller engine displacement compatibility limits?

Are there any downsides to, ie emissions level for example, just blindly choosing the higher rated part with the assumption that more flow will be better?

An example of 2 cats I might consider are the 99439HM (rated for up to 7.8L engines) and the 99039HM (rated for up to 6.2L engines) http://www.car-sound.com/02product/universal/990.asp
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 AM.