2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Where did my low end go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 06-15-2009, 02:31 PM
CSXfan's Avatar
CSXfan
CSXfan is offline
All Star
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasonw
Also test your MAP sensor.

Some mornings I had no low end, others the truck was quite peppy. I replaced the sensor, and now every morning its peppy.

I recommend testing it before you replace it though, unless you have $75-$100 just lying around.
Never heard of a MAP sensor affecting horse power, how does this work? How do you test it?
 
  #22  
Old 06-15-2009, 02:33 PM
Miami_Son's Avatar
Miami_Son
Miami_Son is offline
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Gearing is probably your only option at this point if low end is what you're after. It is a lot cheaper/easier to modify an engine for high rpm performance than low.
 
  #23  
Old 06-15-2009, 02:35 PM
Miami_Son's Avatar
Miami_Son
Miami_Son is offline
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CSXfan
Never heard of a MAP sensor affecting horse power, how does this work? How do you test it?
I think he meant the MAF sensor, which detects the amount of air flowing into the intake. A MAP sensor detects manifold vacuum to determine engine load. If it malfunctions it can cause the ECM to think the truck is coasting when it is actually under load, so it can affect performance negatively if not working properly. I don't think any of these trucks have a MAF sensor, though.
 

Last edited by Miami_Son; 06-15-2009 at 02:59 PM.
  #24  
Old 06-15-2009, 03:17 PM
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
aim4squirrels is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2

In any event, you can't have your cake and eat it too, I'm happy with my 3" exhaust.
Hey Hahns, you're one of the few guys on the forum that runs an Aero 3030. Got any sound clips of that thing? It was one of the few I was considering a while ago.
 
  #25  
Old 06-15-2009, 03:45 PM
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Hahns5.2 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aim4squirrels
Hey Hahns, you're one of the few guys on the forum that runs an Aero 3030. Got any sound clips of that thing? It was one of the few I was considering a while ago.
Here ya go. It destroys the 40 series and every other muffler IMO. Pretty aggressive when you get on it and when it and when cruising it's near silent, a couple weeks ago I did a near 2000 mile road trip and the exhaust didn't bother me one bit.
The second video doesn't sound very good as the camera I was using wasn't great.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2rvrPgAk50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvsgo2HEG00

Sorry if I'm pissing on your thread
 
  #26  
Old 06-15-2009, 04:21 PM
trucklover's Avatar
trucklover
trucklover is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CSXfan

I would really like my power curve to be a lot lower, preferably in the 1500 to 2500rpm range. What can I do to achieve this?
Read this: http://www.bionicdodge.com/bionic/in...p?topic=9197.0
 
  #27  
Old 06-15-2009, 04:25 PM
Miami_Son's Avatar
Miami_Son
Miami_Son is offline
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

"Here's the combo, previous bolt-on mods first. 50mm F&B throttle body, K&N round filter with Xtreme-style lid, Mopar plug wires/Accel coil/NGK plugs. Magnaflow 3" high flow cat/Dynomax 3" ultra-flow muffler. We just installed a set of used, unported 1.92 Mopar Performance R/T heads with a fresh valve job/seals, etc, used Crower 1.6 rockers, March steel underdrive crank pulley, Edelbrock shorty headers (still using factory y-pipe with pre-cats. Factory kegger intake, not modified, with Hughes billet plenum plate. Dyno tuned with an SCT controller."

I don't think I'd call all of that cheap OR easy.
 
  #28  
Old 06-15-2009, 05:20 PM
zman17's Avatar
zman17
zman17 is offline
Retired Moderator - RIP
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NH
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Miami_Son
I think he meant the MAF sensor, which detects the amount of air flowing into the intake. A MAP sensor detects manifold vacuum to determine engine load. If it malfunctions it can cause the ECM to think the truck is coasting when it is actually under load, so it can affect performance negatively if not working properly. I don't think any of these trucks have a MAF sensor, though.
He meant MAP sensor, and I'm in the same boat with CSX. My sig says I have the 14x3 on but I've since removed it, as it kills my low end for some reason. But there is no chance in hell I'm spinning my not so big 265's unless there sand on the road. I also believe my exhaust is opened up too much, and the best route would be to go back to single out 2 1/2 or reduce the duals to 2 1/4. I could care less about high rpm performance. Oh and btw, I have a new MAP sensor coming also, so we'll see.
 
  #29  
Old 06-15-2009, 05:26 PM
jasonw's Avatar
jasonw
jasonw is offline
Site Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Miami_Son
I think he meant the MAF sensor, which detects the amount of air flowing into the intake. A MAP sensor detects manifold vacuum to determine engine load. If it malfunctions it can cause the ECM to think the truck is coasting when it is actually under load, so it can affect performance negatively if not working properly. I don't think any of these trucks have a MAF sensor, though.
Since our trucks don't have a MAF sensor (as you stated), nope, I meant MAP.

I'm not saying it will solve the issue, but it may help a tad. MAP helps the computer control the injectors IIRC, and if they aren't pulsing right, your engine won't be running quite as well as it could and you won't have quite the take-off you would if you had a Grade A condition MAP.

If you have access to a tuner that can clear codes or a scanner that can clear codes, unplug the MAP sensor and see what your truck does when you try to start it and what happens when you try to drive it.
 
  #30  
Old 06-15-2009, 07:00 PM
CSXfan's Avatar
CSXfan
CSXfan is offline
All Star
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2
Sorry if I'm pissing on your thread
Don't worry about it, that's a very sexy sounding truck...


If you have access to a tuner that can clear codes or a scanner that can clear codes, unplug the MAP sensor and see what your truck does when you try to start it and what happens when you try to drive it.
What should I be looking for when I unplug it?

zman17, please let me know what happens when you install the new sensor. Thanks

I guess I could start messing with the exhaust flow, but that's kind of a pain in the butt for something that may not even work. If anyone tries this please let me know how it turns out.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 PM.