2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Looking to buy, which of these 2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #11  
Silver_Dodge's Avatar
Silver_Dodge
Grand Champion
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 6
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by 011500Ram
and 02 2500 IS a Second Generation..
Sorry, I thought it said '03, not '02 (as you can tell from my previous post). My bad. So both are 2nd gens. I'd still go with the '99.
 

Last edited by Silver_Dodge; Jan 28, 2010 at 01:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 02:19 PM
  #12  
Ram_Me's Avatar
Ram_Me
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Did 2002 or 1999s have the 53 block? Or was that older ones only?
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 02:27 PM
  #13  
rideordie's Avatar
rideordie
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Default

The '99 is a better buy IMO as well, unless you really want a stick (I know I would). In that case, just wait on it a bit. Otherwise, get the '99.

Like others have said, the trucks will last forever, the motor in particular, but other things still go wrong eventually, especially if they were neglected and not maintained well.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #14  
Silver_Dodge's Avatar
Silver_Dodge
Grand Champion
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 6
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Ram_Me
Did 2002 or 1999s have the 53 block? Or was that older ones only?
Ya, that's a really good point, good catch Ram_Me. The '99 could definetly have a 53 block, probably not the '02 though. Here's a good link on this topic. YOu should definetly check for this before you buy either one of them.

http://www.stamey.info/Truck/Cummins53BlockFAQ.htm
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #15  
redheadhunter21's Avatar
redheadhunter21
Champion
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Fl
Default

they are both close as far as one is 3 years newer but has more mileage, how do they look are either showing signs of rust, maitenance, POs, has the auto been rebuilt, also I would ask over in Cummins section about any problems with those year motors
I think I would go with the 99 because of less miles and not being the last year made, they sometimes use whatever is laying around to build either last or first years of trucks
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 03:36 PM
  #16  
Silver_Dodge's Avatar
Silver_Dodge
Grand Champion
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 6
From: Colorado
Default

Here's a good link to help you compare the difference between the years (from a Cummins standpoint), and some of the common problems to look for.
http://dodgeram.org/support_pgs/diesel_ix.htm
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 06:18 AM
  #17  
Dakine69302's Avatar
Dakine69302
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

i would go with the 02, imo first off the manual transmission is a lot more reliable than the autos with the cummins. The autos weren't built well enough to handle all the torque that these motors put out, especially if you want to mod it at all. Secondly the 02 may have more miles, but if it wasn't abused then you have to think that the 99 has been sitting on it's feet for 3 years more. that is still wearing on your suspension and any moveable component because it puts stress on all of your parts. so again, imo get underneath it and see if it looks abused, get your hands dirty and grab everything and shake, use a flashlight and check everything out, and if the 02 looks in good shape, then i would go with it, because i bet you'll be putting a new tranny in the auto before anything else goes out in the 02.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 07:36 AM
  #18  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

The auto is a 47re correct? Not nearly as bad as the 46re.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 08:55 AM
  #19  
jmhai's Avatar
jmhai
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Arden N.C.
Default

Originally Posted by Dakine69302
i would go with the 02, imo first off the manual transmission is a lot more reliable than the autos with the cummins. The autos weren't built well enough to handle all the torque that these motors put out, especially if you want to mod it at all. Secondly the 02 may have more miles, but if it wasn't abused then you have to think that the 99 has been sitting on it's feet for 3 years more. that is still wearing on your suspension and any moveable component because it puts stress on all of your parts. so again, imo get underneath it and see if it looks abused, get your hands dirty and grab everything and shake, use a flashlight and check everything out, and if the 02 looks in good shape, then i would go with it, because i bet you'll be putting a new tranny in the auto before anything else goes out in the 02.
+1... also all the D powered equipment I worked on that was used everyday never seem to break down, but the equipment that spent long periods of time sitting unused would always seem to have something go wrong, little things but always something... In this instance I would look at years on the road and service record not mileage..
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #20  
2001Ram's Avatar
2001Ram
Captain
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown Texas
Default

I would go with the 99
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM.