2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.
Old Aug 4, 2015, 07:32 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:

Browse all: General Overview
Print Wikipost

5.2 performance upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 07:53 PM
  #11  
NYJohn's Avatar
NYJohn
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: NEW YORK
Default

Originally Posted by SvrdRam
Well I've been building the truck in stages. Its a full blown show truck thats been at SEMA twice now if that gives you an idea. Currently the fuel system is all there, fuel cell, pump -6 lines and billet rails. Has JBA shorties, no cats with full 3in dual exhaust with X pipe and magnaflow mufflers necked down to a 2.5 inch tips to increase back pressure until I need to uncork it with future mods.

Future mods would be cam, tb, intake and heads. But not sure what order I should do them...
Do a turbo? Iam sure we all would like to see a SEMA truck picture's? Toss a few pic's up
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 02:31 AM
  #12  
99dodge318's Avatar
99dodge318
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by NYJohn
Do a turbo? Iam sure we all would like to see a SEMA truck picture's? Toss a few pic's up

id like to see the interior! any custom pieces?

as stated above we are all pic hungry!
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 04:23 PM
  #13  
SvrdRam's Avatar
SvrdRam
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
From: Detroit
Default

Interior is nothing special. Just leather seats and some sounds. Right now I'm gonna be throwing on a Hughes intake since my plenum is blown but I think I'm gonna throw in a cam since I'm so close. I need some info on what cam to go with.

And heres some pics

Name:  l-4.jpg
Views: 9417
Size:  49.4 KB
Name:  IMAG0150.jpg
Views: 10271
Size:  116.7 KB
Name:  IMAG0151.jpg
Views: 9696
Size:  88.3 KB
Name:  l_29b8c48312af4c5c89defbe8dfd9a6bb.jpg
Views: 9576
Size:  38.7 KB
Name:  21200535926AM57881.jpg
Views: 9664
Size:  70.1 KB
Name:  l-3.jpg
Views: 9380
Size:  49.2 KB
Name:  l_f6f39bec2abc4cada44c496d8feb95fd.jpg
Views: 9560
Size:  66.9 KB
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #14  
TheycallmeLaramie's Avatar
TheycallmeLaramie
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

That truck is awesome!!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 04:39 PM
  #15  
SvrdRam's Avatar
SvrdRam
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
From: Detroit
Default

Yea, she's still looking good for being done for 10yrs now....time to really enjoy it now!
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 05:46 PM
  #16  
seabass202's Avatar
seabass202
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 294
Likes: 1
From: Rotonda West, Florida
Default

I am impressed. and you have been a member here since '08? cool. when I read the thread title I was like "here we go again" but you are definitely serious about your truck! I will be watching the progress.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 06:14 PM
  #17  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

How mechanically inclined are you?

If you want, you can click on my name and go to my garage section. I have a very nice cam and 2.02" valve combo right now, but it comes with some extra work.

I just did a thread called "camshaft is in, 2 year ordeal is over" or something along those lines. Read through it, it'll give you an idea of some things to think about when you choose a cam for a 5.2.

If this is going to be a 90% street cruiser, stick with a 1.92" intake valve, it's more than enough for a 318 ci displacement engine. If you are sure to stroke it in the future, go with the 2.02s.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 06:46 PM
  #18  
zman17's Avatar
zman17
Retired Moderator - RIP
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 17
From: NH
Default

Damn, there's some camber.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 06:51 PM
  #19  
SvrdRam's Avatar
SvrdRam
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
From: Detroit
Default

Yea, I never spent much time worrying about performance on this since I have a 1400hp twin turbo mustang but this truck needs to back up its looks alil.

Yes, just alil negative camber..lol
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 06:57 PM
  #20  
SvrdRam's Avatar
SvrdRam
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by aim4squirrels
How mechanically inclined are you?

If you want, you can click on my name and go to my garage section. I have a very nice cam and 2.02" valve combo right now, but it comes with some extra work.

I just did a thread called "camshaft is in, 2 year ordeal is over" or something along those lines. Read through it, it'll give you an idea of some things to think about when you choose a cam for a 5.2.

If this is going to be a 90% street cruiser, stick with a 1.92" intake valve, it's more than enough for a 318 ci displacement engine. If you are sure to stroke it in the future, go with the 2.02s.

As far as mechanically inclined...i have yet to pay anyone to do anything on my vehicles except for paint and bodywork..

I have read that thread a few times..lol..I'd love to do a 390 kit but I can't bring myself to pull this motor. I'm working 7 days a week averaging 80hrs I just don't have the time for a full build plus theres only 34k on this motor.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.