2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

rear axle swap with disc brakes??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 08:48 PM
  #11  
kejobe's Avatar
kejobe
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Ehh, geuss i'll save that for some other time...after a bunch of research. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 12:07 AM
  #12  
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 10
From: Gainesville, Ga.
Default

disc brakes became available in 2001-1/2
if you find one, i'd grab it. i'd be a great upgrade if you can make it work.

check the little things. e-brake cables. abs sensor.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 01:55 AM
  #13  
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Waller, Tx
Default

So what yall are saying is yes it will probably work, but just not entirely correctly?
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 11:21 PM
  #14  
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 10
From: Gainesville, Ga.
Default

the 2500 swap won't be a direct fit. you'll have to address different spring widths (2.5 vs 3), shackles, perches, etc. also probably/maybe the drive shaft? i wouldn't think the disk brakes would be any harder than the other items and it'd be a great addition.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 03:24 AM
  #15  
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Waller, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by JackJ
Three master cylinders are used in BR models. The
differences between' them concern cylinder bore size
and fluid reservoir capacity.
• The master cylinder in 1500 models has a 28.6
mm (1.125 in.) bore.
• The master cylinder in 2500 and 3500 models
has a 31.8 mm (1.252 in.) bore.
Although the master cylinders used in 2500 and
3500 models have the same bore size, they have dif- .
ferent piston stroke lengths and fluid reservoir
capacities.


This is from the 96 FSM, not saying you will have problems but something you may wanna look at.

All 1500 models and early year production
2500/3500 are equipped with rear drum brake assemblies.
They are two-shoe, duo-servo units with an
automatic adjuster mechanism.
Drum brake assemblies used:
² 1500 models: 11 x 2.25 in.
² 2500/3500 models: 12 1/8 x3.5 in.

From the 2001 FSM

but what does all of this add up to?? would the master cylinder be sufficient? also then i would have 2500 rotors in the back and 1500 in the front? Unless maybe the ld ones would work all the way around??
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 12:43 PM
  #16  
JackJ's Avatar
JackJ
Captain
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

I am fairly certain toy can put the dual piston brakes from a 3500 on the 1500, or maybe it was from the 2500. The larger bore means more fluid flows thus increasing pressure.

If it were me doing this I would completely change over the entire system. The lines should be the same size (don't quote me on that) where you would have your issues would be wheel cylinders, and proportion valves. That us if you go to the lager MC, with the larger brakes I would think you would not gain much using a smaller MC.



Go to the DIY section, you can DL this and the parts books for your trucks.
 

Last edited by JackJ; Aug 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 01:02 PM
  #17  
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Waller, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by JackJ
I am fairly certain toy can put the dual piston brakes from a 3500 on the 1500, or maybe it was from the 2500. The larger bore means more fluid flows thus increasing pressure.

If it were me doing this I would completely change over the entire system. The lines should be the same size (don't quote me on that) where you would have your issues would be wheel cylinders, and proportion valves. That us if you go to the lager MC, with the larger brakes I would think you would not gain much using a smaller MC.



Go to the DIY section, you can DL this and the parts books for your trucks.
well if i could go without having to upgrade the master cylinder and still be able to get discs in the back it would be awesome!
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 01:38 PM
  #18  
JackJ's Avatar
JackJ
Captain
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Slayer
well if i could go without having to upgrade the master cylinder and still be able to get discs in the back it would be awesome!

Rear Disc Brake Rotor
2500/3500
323.5x30 mm (1.18 in)

Front Disc Brake Rotor
1500 4x2
304×30 mm (11.96×1.18
in.)

Wheel Cylinder Bore Size
1500
25.4 mm (1.00 in.)

Wheel Cylinder Bore Size
2500/3500
25.4 mm (1.00 in.)

Brake Booster
Type
1500/2500 Gasoline
Engines
Vacuum Dual Diaphragm
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 01:46 PM
  #19  
Buck Slayer's Avatar
Buck Slayer
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Waller, Tx
Default

so its about the same?? the discs are just a hair bigger? did i read that right
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 PM.