2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Should i get a 5.2 ram or a 4.7 ram?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 01:18 PM
  #41  
Gary-L's Avatar
Gary-L
Legend
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 8
From: Central Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by Wombat Ranger
I very much disagree. I have never done any kind of comparison, but just by nature of the engine construction and such I'm absolutley sure a 318 will run longer than a 4.7 when abused. Take quadcabluv's '95 for example. He drive the thing 20 miles on a broken crankshaft. Think a 4.7 would do that with it's lighter duty build and dohc aluminum heads? I don't. Ever heard of a 400,000+ 4.7? I haven't. I have heard of 5.2's running well past that number though.

Some advice for you, Wombat -- Don't wrestle with a pig in the mud, because the dirtier it gets the more the pig likes it.

Long story short, dodge_dude94 is not going to change his mind no matter what.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 01:44 PM
  #42  
dodge dude94's Avatar
dodge dude94
Banned Goober Smoocher
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,916
Likes: 1
Default

Why does everyone put an underscore in my name?
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 01:49 PM
  #43  
OK_Ram's Avatar
OK_Ram
Rookie
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by VWandDodge
Some advice for you, Wombat -- Don't wrestle with a pig in the mud, because the dirtier it gets the more the pig likes it.

Long story short, dodge_dude94 is not going to change his mind no matter what.
I agree. We all have our convictions. I look at what a mechanic says as valuable because they perform work on well maintained and abused cars alike. Usually when they find an engine that they do or do not like I take it into serious consideration. At the very least they can let me know what kind of work I will be doing to an engine in the near or distant future. Perhaps Mr. 94 is the first fanboy of the 4.7l that I have come across
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 02:07 PM
  #44  
dodge dude94's Avatar
dodge dude94
Banned Goober Smoocher
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,916
Likes: 1
Default

Fanboy I am not. I am going from what I have experienced in the 7 years we've had the truck. Which has been ZERO issues with the engine. Go onto the 3rd gen forum and they will tell you to ditch both engine ideas and go for the Hemi. So, either way, we're biased to the 5.2 and they're biased to the Hemi.

Oh well.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 02:43 PM
  #45  
h3lzsn1p3r's Avatar
h3lzsn1p3r
Captain
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Eganville. On
Default

Originally Posted by dodge dude94
^Once again, coming from someone whose never owned a 4.7.
yes i have had one and i sold the motor and put in the 5.7
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 02:48 PM
  #46  
h3lzsn1p3r's Avatar
h3lzsn1p3r
Captain
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Eganville. On
Default

Originally Posted by dodge dude94
You must also take into account that a mechanic also sees vehicles that are abused on a daily basis. An abused 318 won't last any longer than an abused 4.7. Sometimes it is good to know folks that have actually daily driven a vehicle 70k+ mi

i have swaped a couple 318s but they are from high kilometers (300k km and up) and i see lots of 4.7 blow their sides at 120k km
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2012 | 12:48 AM
  #47  
QuadCabLuv's Avatar
QuadCabLuv
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wombat Ranger
I very much disagree. I have never done any kind of comparison, but just by nature of the engine construction and such I'm absolutley sure a 318 will run longer than a 4.7 when abused. Take quadcabluv's '95 for example. He drive the thing 20 miles on a broken crankshaft. Think a 4.7 would do that with it's lighter duty build and ohc aluminum heads? I don't. Ever heard of a 400,000+ 4.7? I haven't. I have heard of 5.2's running well past that number though.
Tis true.....

BTW. I. Think I could have drove it another 20 miles.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2012 | 12:45 PM
  #48  
colinbreckmang's Avatar
colinbreckmang
Amateur
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Delta, BC Canada
Default

-I had an 02 Dakota 4.7L. 130km (canadian truck) and the heads cracked. My buddy also had the same truck and experianced the same problem. They sure did haul *** though, very fun trucks to drive before the issues

-Another buddy has an 02 ram 1500 with a 4.7 that cracked a head aswell.

Overall I would definetly not reccomend the 4.7 I swaped my Dakota for my ram 5.9 and definetly prefer it.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM.