2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

sct+160* tstat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-18-2014, 02:03 PM
ReaperFIVE9's Avatar
ReaperFIVE9
ReaperFIVE9 is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default sct+160* tstat?

so I just got my tuner, and was reading about how I have to put a 160* tstat in my ram if I want to run the 91 oct tune. now obviously Ive read on here about the 180*, and the ping issue with running the stock tstat with the advanced timing. I am just curious if 1) I really have to go to a 160, as I am in Idaho and this winter as been crazy, ( 50* today, suppose to snow wed,thur and be like 10*) and don't really want to wait all day for my truck to warm up, and 2) has/is anyone running a 160? is that too cold for these engines (5.9l), and will a 160 cause more issues then its worth if anything, and I should just shut up and get the 180.. any and all criticism is expected.

sorry if this topic is already on here. searching 160 tstat didn't give me anything.




thanks a bunch.
 
  #2  
Old 02-18-2014, 02:16 PM
CSDavies26's Avatar
CSDavies26
CSDavies26 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Evans City, PA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have the 180 thermostat with the 91 tune and it works just fine. Ive heard that people will get check engine lights when using the 160 because the computer will say that the engine has been too cold for too long. Idk what the law is in Idaho but around here you won't pass an inspection/emissions test with the CEL on. Just remember that these engines were designed to run at 195 so by lowering the temp, you will cause increased wear on engine parts because the internal components will not expand to fit tolerances properly. It's generally accepted that the 180 can be used without observing too many negative side effects...I noticed a slight drop in gas mileage when I went to the 180 - this is due to colder/denser air intake temps and the computer correcting the air/fuel ratio...if you go to 160, gas mileage drops even further.
 
  #3  
Old 02-18-2014, 02:17 PM
stewie01's Avatar
stewie01
stewie01 is offline
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I thought Sean @ HemiFever recommended the 180* tstat.

Some will argue there's no need and others will say to use the 180*....

It's a crap shoot.
 
  #4  
Old 02-18-2014, 02:21 PM
merc225hp's Avatar
merc225hp
merc225hp is offline
Champion
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,712
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Deff not the 160, as others have posted 180 or 195.
 
  #5  
Old 02-18-2014, 03:16 PM
Thornloe Pride's Avatar
Thornloe Pride
Thornloe Pride is offline
Captain
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ontario
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^+1. 160 stat is too cool. It does weird things to the motor and computer. 180 or 195.
 
  #6  
Old 02-18-2014, 03:18 PM
jpsycoboy5's Avatar
jpsycoboy5
jpsycoboy5 is offline
Professional
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know how cold it is in Idaho but here in Michigan I can't run the 180 in winter I like my heat hot and lately it's been low teens. I've heard of people running the 195 in winter and when it warms up switching to the 180 for the summer months definitely not the 160 you'll freeze your **** off.
 



Quick Reply: sct+160* tstat?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM.