DodgeForum.com
Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

DodgeForum.com (https://dodgeforum.com/forum/)
-   2nd Gen Ram Tech (https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen-ram-tech-64/)
-   -   Thinking GM style battery conversion (https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen-ram-tech/421426-thinking-gm-style-battery-conversion.html)

primem 02-12-2019 09:00 PM
Originally Posted by MoparFanatic21 (Post 3429123)
I bought a "kit" at Walmart. It came with the pads that go under the battery terminals and a spray by NOCO I think and never had anything corrode. I go through terminals like water because I am trying to find the perfect terminal to connect accessory wires to.
we use bus bars
https://www.remybattery.com/power-di...-positive.html

MoparFanatic21 02-12-2019 09:01 PM
Originally Posted by primem (Post 3429170)
I have been down that road but they don't look clean in my opinion

rebeltaz83 02-13-2019 05:46 AM
Originally Posted by MoparFanatic21 (Post 3429160)
What is that?
Stick a penny on top of the terminal and it won't corrode. Learned it from an old school mechanic years ago.

ZEN357 02-13-2019 07:53 AM
Originally Posted by fj5gtx (Post 3429017)
GM style side terminals just seem to have an clear advantage over top post setups for durability, corrosion avoidance, etc. Cables are available off the shelf, and are economical. They also have a superior mounting setup... but I'll probably have to slice that piece off the bottom side to get it into the mopar tray... anyone do this yet to a 2nd gen?
I had that setup from the factory in my 2001 Mustang Bullitt. I never had any issue with corrosion. I prefer the side mount over the top mount. My 2006 Chrysler 300 is a top mount and always has issues.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 AM.
Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands