2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Thinking GM style battery conversion

  #1  
Old 02-11-2019, 07:55 PM
fj5gtx's Avatar
fj5gtx
fj5gtx is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,797
Received 101 Likes on 94 Posts
Default Thinking GM style battery conversion

GM style side terminals just seem to have an clear advantage over top post setups for durability, corrosion avoidance, etc. Cables are available off the shelf, and are economical. They also have a superior mounting setup... but I'll probably have to slice that piece off the bottom side to get it into the mopar tray... anyone do this yet to a 2nd gen?


 
  #2  
Old 02-11-2019, 08:39 PM
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
MoparFanatic21 is offline
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,032
Received 306 Likes on 298 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fj5gtx
GM style side terminals just seem to have an clear advantage over top post setups for durability, corrosion avoidance, etc. Cables are available off the shelf, and are economical. They also have a superior mounting setup... but I'll probably have to slice that piece off the bottom side to get it into the mopar tray... anyone do this yet to a 2nd gen?
I'm not familiar with that setup do you have a picture? I use an anti-corrosive spray
 
  #3  
Old 02-11-2019, 08:49 PM
fj5gtx's Avatar
fj5gtx
fj5gtx is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,797
Received 101 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Been using CRC battery terminal protector spray for decades... this setup just seems superior. Usually convert tractors over to this, thinking my problem with the truck will be that plastic formed battery tray...



 
  #4  
Old 02-11-2019, 08:52 PM
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
crazzywolfie is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orangeville ontario
Posts: 8,023
Received 71 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

i can't say much about using side mount terminals on a 2nd gen but have been using then on my 81 and so far they have worked best. the top mount ones seem to always have more issues in 1 way or another. have had some corrode bad or have a bad connection. with side terminal i have not seen either of these issues pop up in the last 7+ years. plus if you buy a dual post battery it can give you more options to hook things up or it can make it easier if you ever need a boost or to give a boost.

 
  #5  
Old 02-11-2019, 09:09 PM
fj5gtx's Avatar
fj5gtx
fj5gtx is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,797
Received 101 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Hmmm... I never liked the top posts hanging out when you had side terminals as well - so I never bought one that way and paid a little extra for a less universal battery... BUT I did notice that configuration is sold for the 2nd gen ram application - so maybe it would fit in the battery tray w/o modification. I don't think I need 4 connection areas on the battery - this truck has manual everything, but it would make it an easy conversion.
 
  #6  
Old 02-11-2019, 09:19 PM
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
crazzywolfie is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orangeville ontario
Posts: 8,023
Received 71 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

i just always find the side terminals more of a pain to boost off of especially if you got easy access to top posts. plus it is not like it hurts to have the extra posts. i got a whole bunch of extra grounds hooked to the 1 and it makes adding stuff like amps or other things easier.
 
  #7  
Old 02-11-2019, 10:16 PM
primem's Avatar
primem
primem is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,816
Received 55 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

not sure how true this is but someone told me gm dropped the side terminal due to battery acid leakage concerns. I wouldn't go out of my way to do a conversion. Battery gassing is a big factor in battery terminal corrosion. have the battery and charging system checked and if its ok...apply an inhibitor spray on the posts. I use white lithium grease as I have a whack of it.

Be happy we went with negative grd systems or else every body grd would have that ash build up.
 
  #8  
Old 02-11-2019, 10:54 PM
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
crazzywolfie is offline
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orangeville ontario
Posts: 8,023
Received 71 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

gm has been using side post terminals since the 70's. i really don't see side post batteries leaking any more or less than an average top post battery unless they are making them that cheap. if you need a new battery and connector i would do the conversions. i even find the bolt that clamps the terminal together on top posts usually rusts or something and you end up fighting with it the next time you have to disconnect the battery for some reason. i think GM probably switched back to top post batteries to make things simpler and standard. whether it is a good or bad thing it is hard to say. no one really cares if it lasts. they just have to make it past warranty and then it is your problem lol
 
  #9  
Old 02-12-2019, 12:05 AM
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
MoparFanatic21 is offline
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,032
Received 306 Likes on 298 Posts
Default

Ah it's just a standard side post thought something was special about it. I think I'll keep my top posts just upgraded the connectors. I have a disk battery setup for attaching accessories
 
  #10  
Old 02-12-2019, 03:12 AM
draftingmonkey's Avatar
draftingmonkey
draftingmonkey is offline
Captain
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you looked into these...inexpensive, no new cables, and a place to still jump off of if needed.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Thinking GM style battery conversion



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.