3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

P245 vs. P260 tire?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 11:56 AM
  #11  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

I don't think the height difference will make much of a difference in your mpgs, a little, but I'm talking a fraction of 1 mpg here. True, raising a vehicle will create more wind drag and will adversely effect mpgs, but we are not talking a major lift here.
Now a WIDER tire will effect mpgs more readily, as the drag or surface friction caused by more surface area making contact with the pavement will increase.

I recently went from 235/65/17s to 265/65/17s on my Jeep Grand Cherokee and was shocked to find close to a 4.5 mpg decrease in fuel economy! However, for a recent trip to Ga., I decided to return the Superchips tune on my truck to stock and install it on the 4.7 HO in the Jeep for the trip, as the truck was gonna be parked for the month anyway. During the installation of the Performance Tune on the Jeep, I recalibrated the speedometer for the tire height difference.

I found the actual mpg difference to be more like 2.5 mpg in town and 1.5 on the interstate. The big loss of mpgs on the overhead and by hand calculations was fictitious and in actuality the difference in the speedometer being calibrated for factory size tires.

The 2.5 I can swallow, as I installed a 2" BB and the tires are also about 2" taller and an inch wider than the stockers. You are not even doing a BB (budget lift), so your losses wouldn't even be close to mine.

Go with the 265's, the look will far outweigh the minimal mpg loss...
 

Last edited by HammerZ71; Nov 10, 2009 at 01:15 PM. Reason: can't spell for sh*t!!!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #12  
dodgetrucker75's Avatar
dodgetrucker75
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: live oak, ca
Default

245's look small, that is what i put on mine a couple months ago and getting a new set tomarrow because i cant stand the way they look, the 265 is an inch wider than the 245, a 245x75 is the same hight as a 265x70, and the 265x75 is an inch taller, and an inch makes a big difference in the look
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #13  
mdk23's Avatar
mdk23
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks to everyone for their input, I ordered the 265/70/16's. That is what I was going to do, but wanted to see what others experience was. Thanks again bros!
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #14  
dakotaff's Avatar
dakotaff
Champion
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 91
From: Jersey
Default

The 265/70/16's will look sooo much better, good choice.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #15  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

BTW, what brand/model tire did you get?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #16  
marker227's Avatar
marker227
Professional
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: USA East
Default

Originally Posted by mdk23
Are you saying the mileage is better on the 245's?

My driving is mostly highway, but I do live in Iowa and have winter roads etc. I do occasionally haul a boat that I have to put in and out of the water. Don't do much off-roading unless you count driving on gravel roads occasionally. Thanks for any help you can offer.
To be completely honest... I'd love to get rid of my 265's. They are about 85-90% new and I want better MPG. Wanna buy them?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #17  
Frenchy's Avatar
Frenchy
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Default

marker you must not have read the whole thread... the 265 - 245 thing will not be a difference in mpgs, considering you'll have to recalibrate the speedometer and everything, it'll probably end up being about the same...

when i went from 245 - 265 I lost like, .1mpg... but if you want a puny tire, more power to ya!
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #18  
marker227's Avatar
marker227
Professional
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: USA East
Default

Hmm, that's odd because people in the thread I started about getting poor MPG suggested that my tires (I think they are for off road) are killing about 3 mpg.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #19  
Frenchy's Avatar
Frenchy
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Default

do you have your window sticker, saying what came on your truck? if so, check if it came with 245 or 265, if it came with 245 and you have 265s now, it prolly was never calibrated...
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #20  
paul05dak's Avatar
paul05dak
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
From: Upstate New York
Default

wouldn't the tread design also have a impact? Or the width make a bigger difference? and the tire compound also. something softer would have a less MPG then a harder compound (but better traction in the rain/snow)?? As I have heard from others before. Size isn't everything!! lol
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.