3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Tire Size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #11  
dodgetrucker75's Avatar
dodgetrucker75
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: live oak, ca
Default

245-265 thoes first numberes are the width of the tire, the second is the side wall hight, and is a persentage of the width, so the second number is going to relate to your overall hight, but changes with wheel size,
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 01:08 AM
  #12  
hwcurtice's Avatar
hwcurtice
Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 353
Likes: 1
From: Sultan, WA
Default

Originally Posted by lghtngblt02
... of course you know what 18 means...
Means they are of age?
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 02:02 AM
  #13  
trucky's Avatar
trucky
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
From: Omaha NE
Default

trucker, I was out of my mind when I typed that. I was on ambien after a 20 hour mission. So ANYway...regardless of the measurement...does a smaller circumference tire hail improvements yay or nay?
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 02:58 AM
  #14  
Slick Dakota's Avatar
Slick Dakota
Captain
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lghtngblt02
I know mine are 18s but I am running 265-60 R18s

265 is the width in mm, 60 is the percentage of the width that equals the sidewall height, for this situation 265 x .6 = 159 mm and of course you know what 18 means...
lghtngblt02 Since we are running the same stock wheel from Chrysler any idea what the back spacing is on our stock wheels? Cya Slick
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #15  
Frenchy's Avatar
Frenchy
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by trucky
trucker, I was out of my mind when I typed that. I was on ambien after a 20 hour mission. So ANYway...regardless of the measurement...does a smaller circumference tire hail improvements yay or nay?
it may be lighter?

therefore like .1 more mpgs.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #16  
trucky's Avatar
trucky
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
From: Omaha NE
Default

No, I'm pretty sure the smaller tire roating less times over a distance of one mile over say an offroad tire makes it easier on the vehicle. Same revs and less 'distance' to cover for one complete rotation equates to better mileage and even torque. I guess this forum needs more scientists? I basically answered my own question but was trying to see if anyone else had heard of this.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #17  
Altair's Avatar
Altair
Dak attack!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1
From: Turn down the heat please
Default

Originally Posted by trucky
No, I'm pretty sure the smaller tire roating less times over a distance of one mile over say an offroad tire makes it easier on the vehicle. Same revs and less 'distance' to cover for one complete rotation equates to better mileage and even torque. I guess this forum needs more scientists? I basically answered my own question but was trying to see if anyone else had heard of this.
Well circumference is just a function of the diameter. A tire with a larger diameter will cover more ground in one rotation, a tire with a smaller diameter will cover less ground. Going to a taller tire is like going to numerically lower gearing and vice versa for a shorter tire. Whether or not it equates to better mileage has to do with city vs highway and can be tricky, it is also complicated by taller tires often weighing more. But you are a little off the smaller tire will have to rotate more times over a distance of one mile.

The easiest way to look at it is like this: the circumference of your tire is how far you will move with exactly one revolution of the tire. To prove what I said above take your mile and divide it by the circumference of the shorter tire, then the mile by the circumference of the taller tire and compare the two.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #18  
trucky's Avatar
trucky
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
From: Omaha NE
Default

Yah that's what I meant, smaller goes more times, which creates the disadvantage of tire wear. I don't see why you mentioned diameter... obviously a larger diameter covers more ground because that makes it a longer circumference...so why not just say a tire with bigger circumferece? More syllables? Haha.
I see what you mean with it having benefits in certain areas ie:city vs. highway because it is changing your gearing slightly with the smaller tire. So, basically it goes back to do what looks better!
good stuff.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #19  
Altair's Avatar
Altair
Dak attack!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1
From: Turn down the heat please
Default

Originally Posted by trucky
I don't see why you mentioned diameter... obviously a larger diameter covers more ground because that makes it a longer circumference...so why not just say a tire with bigger circumferece?
Nah, just wanted to make it easier for everyone, a lot of people think of tires in terms of height.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 PM.