i also liked the pattern. looks like bones. and also liked the skulls on the side. being that they are bias,maybe thats why i havent seen anyone with them.

 

If they are bias tires, why does it say radial on the link? I have the cepek fcII's which are pretty good. Hammers gotem too. They are radials too.

 

The FC-II's are a real good tire. I had them on my 2nd gen ram and loved them.

 

all the other cepeks are radials. just not those crushers. they are made with fiberglass. cause when i seen dirtydog post it i didnt believe it. so i started searching and sure enough.

let me see if i can find it again.

 

here it is. notice in the description is says radial construction, not radial tire. and they have no steel in them. made with fiberglass. granted, i hope we are both wrong. because i had my mind set on them. and the mud country and the FC-II's are not what i am looking for. and i know they are both very good tires.many,many reports everywhere with great reviews.

http://www.offroaders.com/tech/AT-MT...ek-Crusher.htm

 

well going tomorrow to get my rims and tries put on. been trying to wait for the weather to brake. but cannt wait any more. i will get some before and after shots.

cepek dc1 black and cepek crushers.

 

It's still a radial, just not steel belted that's all. Not using a steel belt, in theory, gives the tire more flex off-road. This tire was designed primarily for the rock crawling crowd. The fiberglass belts will give it more bias type performance off-road, but it is still a radial tire and as such, should yield acceptable performance on pavement...

 

sick lookin' wheels man!

 

here they are not the cleanest. took them out and tested them. they go pretty good in the mud.

 

Learn how to post pics kid, you waste my valuable time...