3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

New torque converters?

Old Feb 6, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #1  
bigwood's Avatar
bigwood
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default New torque converters?

Hey, new member here and just had a quick question. I have heard that the driveline of these dodges are quite restricting. Would a performance or after market torque converter make much of a difference?

thanks!
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #2  
04QC4X4's Avatar
04QC4X4
Captain
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, TX
Default

It would, but they are pretty pricey. I'm sure there are some on this site that have done that and they will chime in.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 09:54 PM
  #3  
OlDirtyJohn's Avatar
OlDirtyJohn
Record Breaker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 2
From: Oceanside, CA
Default

yes, it would make a difference. it would be getting a lot more of your engines HP to the rear wheels. if you can afford it, go for it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 10:01 PM
  #4  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

losses in throught the stock tranny are among the worst in the industry, about a 28% HP loss from engine to rear wheels. Nissan and Toyotas by comparison are around 16%...
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 10:16 PM
  #5  
FrostKing's Avatar
FrostKing
Professional
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: Cochrane, AB
Default

A new converter won't change the HP loss. This is coming from the transmission itself and the axle.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #6  
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn's Avatar
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by FrostKing
A new converter won't change the HP loss. This is coming from the transmission itself and the axle.
That's not what APS claims....the say that there's 14% loss just in the TC itself and their TC reduces this loss by 6%. http://www.apsprecision.com/TQConverter.html How much of that is true I dunno..
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 10:31 PM
  #7  
FrostKing's Avatar
FrostKing
Professional
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: Cochrane, AB
Default

When the converter is locked, there is 0% loss. It depends if you are talking about fuel efficiency power losses or WOT power losses. An aftermarket unit will likely put more power to the ground that the stock unit, but there are grey areas to make the statistics favorable for anybody.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #8  
Rojhan's Avatar
Rojhan
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FrostKing
When the converter is locked, there is 0% loss. It depends if you are talking about fuel efficiency power losses or WOT power losses. An aftermarket unit will likely put more power to the ground that the stock unit, but there are grey areas to make the statistics favorable for anybody.
Picking a nit; there is "0%" slip when the converter is locked, but there is still loss in just moving the mass of the converter and fluid. However, changing to a different converter wouldn't change the loss due to mass by much/any, although there could easily be performance gains when not locked.
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.