3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

4.7 HO Cam swap possible piston ring blow by

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-06-2009, 10:13 PM
bobbyafs's Avatar
bobbyafs
bobbyafs is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Burkburnett, TX
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.7 HO Cam swap possible piston ring blow by

First off I would like to say i am sorry , i know on other forums it is usually customary for your first post to be a pic of your truck. Sorry to say i do not have a pic of Savannah. That will change.

Second thing is hello everyone i have been looking through the threads and there are some pretty d#%n knowledgable people around here.

Now my question. I have 74000 miles on my truck and my lash adjusters are stating to get noisy so i am going to change them. I also figured while i was at it i would put the HO cams in. When i mentioned this to my pops (who BTW is one of the best mechanics i have ever met) he suggested against it and told me that the lifts on the new cams would create a higher compression and could cause my piston rings to unseat resulting in blow by. Has any one changed the cams on their 4.7 with as many miles on the block (or more) as mine with any issues of piston rings unseating or any other oil blow by probs? Should i worry about it or just go with the HO cams and be done with it?

Any opinions would be greatly appreciated and thanx in advance everybody.
 

Last edited by bobbyafs; 03-06-2009 at 10:14 PM. Reason: spelling
  #2  
Old 03-06-2009, 11:23 PM
ramracing4.7ltr's Avatar
ramracing4.7ltr
ramracing4.7ltr is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brighton ,CO
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yep that would be...me ! around the same mileage, i put h/o 's and they are actually (recommended) if anything by anybody here ......they will not hurt a thing , and thats from personally having them
 
  #3  
Old 03-06-2009, 11:32 PM
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
HammerZ71 is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Georgia/East Florida
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

If you were going to go to a more aggressive cam, 206 or 212 I could see it, but the H.O. Cams, I can't see it being an issue at all...
 
  #4  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:27 AM
ramracing4.7ltr's Avatar
ramracing4.7ltr
ramracing4.7ltr is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brighton ,CO
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i agree....and in another forum there are big debates to whether the 206 and 212's are good for our truck over H/O's anyway.. but i agree with hammer
 
  #5  
Old 03-07-2009, 04:10 AM
alleycat4977's Avatar
alleycat4977
alleycat4977 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

forgive my ignorance on the issue but please explain why 206 and 212's are "not good" for our trucks. thanks
 
  #6  
Old 03-07-2009, 07:16 AM
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
HammerZ71 is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Georgia/East Florida
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ramracing4.7ltr
i agree....and in another forum there are big debates to whether the 206 and 212's are good for our truck over H/O's anyway.. but i agree with hammer
I'm pretty sure I know where that debate would be, I'll have to check it out.
I've got a pretty good idea a certain someone who sells the H.O.'s is behind that.
But believe me, I've seen actual dyno's and heard the lope from all three (and the 212x as well). And don't forget that I have the H.O.'s in my Grand Cherokee. But there is no comparison, the gains from the H.O.'s are the least of the bunch by far.
That's not saying they are not a worthwhile mod by any means, though. The other cams need much more modifications to work where the H.O.'s are basically plug and play and really do wake that 4.7 up a good bit...
 
  #7  
Old 03-07-2009, 10:37 AM
alleycat4977's Avatar
alleycat4977
alleycat4977 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have been to air rams website and the specs on the cams seem out of wack. idk if someone else was inserting the info and messed up or what but check it out. im not trying to point out faults i'm just trying to understand.
 
  #8  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:48 AM
Ilovemytruck's Avatar
Ilovemytruck
Ilovemytruck is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

H.O. camshafts add 25 hp, well thats the round about number. I suppose the next step up would be 206? How much hp more is the 206 and 212, anyone. I was going to go H.O. but now seeing this, I might go 206 all the way.
 
  #9  
Old 03-08-2009, 12:58 AM
bobbyafs's Avatar
bobbyafs
bobbyafs is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Burkburnett, TX
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies everybody. I didn't think the HO's would be a prob, but i would rather ask than find out the hard way.

My plans are the HO cams, headers, CAI, and cat back exhaust, and finally a programmer.

Again thanks everyone for the info......i guess now is to order the lashadjusters and the cams.
 
  #10  
Old 03-08-2009, 04:36 AM
matty_p's Avatar
matty_p
matty_p is offline
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Forkston, Pennsylvania
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Let me know how the H.O. cams are. I am very interested in putting them in. Probably be a few months, but I'd like to do it before summers end.
 


Quick Reply: 4.7 HO Cam swap possible piston ring blow by



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.