3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Widening stock wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 11:11 PM
  #1  
DaHipaKea1313's Avatar
DaHipaKea1313
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Ga. USA
Default Widening stock wheels

First off I'm JUST thinking of this, plus 17" tires are usually cheeper. I was wondering if anyone has used Stockton wheel out of California to widen their rims?

I'm thinking of going for the "Big-n-Little" look larger/wider in the back and running the regular stock rims in the front. I'll just be widening 2 of my Stock wheels leave the backspacing alone and maybe a 2-3 inches widening job. I'm thinking some 255-60s/17 for the front rims and 275 or 295-60s /17 on the back. You know kinda old school.

I had BFG 245-60s/15 and 275/60/15 on my 1972 LeMans but the rims were the same 15x8 stock Pontiac rim's. (Might have been only 15 x 7's) for the summer and stockers for the winter but it didn't get driving much just parked out back in winter.

I went home about 6 months later after basic to get the car and my rims, but someone had broken into my mom's storage pen you know for multiple tenents and stole them. I wanted to kick some *** that night.

Oh well just looking for info on widening the rims, thanks in advance.
H-

..
 

Last edited by DaHipaKea1313; Feb 2, 2010 at 11:15 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 12:03 AM
  #2  
Marx's Avatar
Marx
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 1
From: Ontario Canada
Default

i have the stock 275 60 R20's so the 275 will fit for sure its a 20" diameter and 9" with rim i think my tires are 9.5" wide
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 06:23 AM
  #3  
ATVWES's Avatar
ATVWES
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Default

255/60/17 = 29"/10"/17" 275/60= 30/11/17 295/60= 31/11.5/17
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 06:56 AM
  #4  
cwboyjohnny24's Avatar
cwboyjohnny24
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Default

The only reason it would be bad is for tire rotation purposes. That would be my only reason to second think that. I'd like to see that though.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 07:02 AM
  #5  
mdram43's Avatar
mdram43
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, MD (right outside DC)
Default

I'd imagine that cant be cheap, so why not just buy aftermarket wheels? you can pick up 17s rather cheap, ive got 285's on my stock 17s no problem
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 08:04 AM
  #6  
SMKNRAM's Avatar
SMKNRAM
Champion
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 2
From: Sylva, NC
Default

I am assuming it is a 2wd? If so then it would not hurt anything other than being able to rotate tires. If it were me going for that look, there would have to be as big a difference as possible front to back. smallest tire you can get on the front and like a real wide 50 on the back. I would also try to keep the height close. That is what I think of as old school hot rod, muscle car look.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 08:17 AM
  #7  
RubberFrog's Avatar
RubberFrog
Champion
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Default

x2

This is a great muscle car look, but I think it would look kinda off on a truck.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.