4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

What Octane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #11  
jayman84's Avatar
jayman84
Captain
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: middle of the state, IA
Default

Originally Posted by 05Dakotaho

When towing or hauling weights above 50% of the GCVWR, the higher octanes enhance both the performance and economy primarily because the PCM senses that it does not have to "protect" the engine from detonation to the extent it would with a lower octane. For me, the 20% additional cost of higher octane fuel is warranted for the "driveability" and peak torque attained.
I'm assuming you are talking about 89 octane when you say higher octane. If you are running 91+ octane in these trucks without a tune then you are for sure throwing money away.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 11:54 AM
  #12  
05Dakotaho's Avatar
05Dakotaho
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by jayman84
I'm assuming you are talking about 89 octane when you say higher octane. If you are running 91+ octane in these trucks without a tune then you are for sure throwing money away.
Perhaps...I have no empirical evidence to prove either claim; mine or yours.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 12:41 PM
  #13  
SubRammer's Avatar
SubRammer
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Default

I'm about 90% sure i read in the truck's user manual where it almost explicitly says that using gasoline with an octane rating above 89 is pointless and a waste of money because it will not provide any additional power gains. I will double check next time I get in my truck and report what i find.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #14  
kevinc66's Avatar
kevinc66
Professional
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Ft Sill,Ok
Default

Originally Posted by SubRammer
I'm about 90% sure i read in the truck's user manual where it almost explicitly says that using gasoline with an octane rating above 89 is pointless and a waste of money because it will not provide any additional power gains. I will double check next time I get in my truck and report what i find.
It says that and I believe it says that using anything higher than what is recommended it could cause damage to the motor.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 04:35 PM
  #15  
ivaskaj's Avatar
ivaskaj
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Default

I am assuming that since you paid extra for the Hemi, you want all 390 horses available. Use 89. If not, then use 87. But then why did you pay extra for the Hemi? Makes no sense. For the little extra it will cost to fill up with 89 over 87, it's not worth it to sacrifice the power. We're talking $3 per tank. If that's gonna break the bank, then you probably don't need to be in a brand new $40,000 truck anyway. I'm not trying to sound like an ***, it just makes no sense to worry about $3 a week.
 

Last edited by ivaskaj; Jan 17, 2010 at 04:39 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #16  
jayman84's Avatar
jayman84
Captain
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: middle of the state, IA
Cool

Originally Posted by ivaskaj
I am assuming that since you paid extra for the Hemi, you want all 390 horses available. Use 89. If not, then use 87. But then why did you pay extra for the Hemi? Makes no sense. For the little extra it will cost to fill up with 89 over 87, it's not worth it to sacrifice the power. We're talking $3 per tank. If that's gonna break the bank, then you probably don't need to be in a brand new $40,000 truck anyway. I'm not trying to sound like an ***, it just makes no sense to worry about $3 a week.
Or you could move to Iowa, use 89 octane, and save about $3 a week since 89 is 6 cents cheaper than 87 octane here.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 08:11 PM
  #17  
DWB2010RAM's Avatar
DWB2010RAM
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Vaughan, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by kevinc66
It says that and I believe it says that using anything higher than what is recommended it could cause damage to the motor.
Is that true because I've been putting in sunoco ultra 94 in my truck, if thats the case I'll just use 89. I've always used ultra 94 in the cars i've had with V8's so it's just a habit.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #18  
SubRammer's Avatar
SubRammer
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Default

No, higher octane is not going to harm your engine, its just unnecessary in our trucks.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 09:37 PM
  #19  
randomdef's Avatar
randomdef
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Medicine Hat, Alberta
Default

I've been using 89 for the last few tanks, I notice no difference, going back to 87 next fill up.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 09:39 PM
  #20  
randomdef's Avatar
randomdef
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Medicine Hat, Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by ivaskaj
I am assuming that since you paid extra for the Hemi, you want all 390 horses available. Use 89. If not, then use 87. But then why did you pay extra for the Hemi? Makes no sense. For the little extra it will cost to fill up with 89 over 87, it's not worth it to sacrifice the power. We're talking $3 per tank. If that's gonna break the bank, then you probably don't need to be in a brand new $40,000 truck anyway. I'm not trying to sound like an ***, it just makes no sense to worry about $3 a week.
no dyno that i've seen has said that 89 gives more ponies than 87. In fact, the only dyno with 87 that I've seen has been from a predator and it shows 20+hp over stock.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.