4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

8.7L/100Km (27mpg)

Old Apr 6, 2010 | 06:02 PM
  #11  
drought_buster's Avatar
drought_buster
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by randomdef
I didn't mean any offence. Where I am is the same way, but a slight grade none the less. don't discount downhill travel to the cause of your miracle mileage
Sure I can't guarantee the grade of the road. I chose this road becuase it flat to me and it's a place where I can set the cruise control at 50mph for 19miles and not worry about stop signs, street lights, viadocks, traffic in front of me, people turning on roads slowing me down which causes me to touch the accelerator/break pedal. it's 20 straight minutes in MDS mode with the cruise control turned on and i'm resetting the mpg every mile. But, I don't feel it's miracle mileage. I believe if someone duplicates this test, they will see similar results to my data. My Low number for my data is 23.4mpg and a high with 27.0mpg. My median number is about 25mpg. I only record the highest data point for the last 5 miles of driving because that's where the mpg meter will start to plateau.

Originally Posted by topgun
Hand calculate the MPGs and see what it actually is.
How would you suggest I hand calculate a 19mile test to validate the accuracy of the mpg meter in the truck?

I would have to fill-up the tank to full, drive 19 miles on the road I test on and refill the tank. Except there is no gas station at either end of the road.

I'm not claiming this is my regular gas mileage for a tank of gas. Im trying to provide proof where the mpg meter will plateau at the fastest speed possible while staying in 4 cylinder mode. So far my data is telling me you get an average of 25mpg in 4 cylinder mode going 50mph.
 

Last edited by drought_buster; Apr 6, 2010 at 06:17 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 07:03 PM
  #12  
moparfreak77's Avatar
moparfreak77
Rookie
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default

Actually since that metric it's over 32 mpg (canadian gallon). I have got around 29 mpg (a short run till a hill)with mine so I believe you. Anytime I have checked the computer to working it out myself the computer has always been within .5 mpg.
 

Last edited by moparfreak77; Apr 6, 2010 at 07:08 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #13  
oyen24's Avatar
oyen24
Professional
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
Default

I can believe it some. You must be in western Iowa. I have been out that way when I worked for a power company building new line in mid to western Iowa, and he is right. It is FLAT and you don't see much but corn fields. I got 19-20 once, when my truck was new, and was on a 4 lane highway and cruise set at 65. and the road was fairly flat.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #14  
HEMI_ROM's Avatar
HEMI_ROM
Captain
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 626
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Esat to believe, I routinely get 22-23 MPG on the freeway and my best is 26.7MPG. My picture of that is as shakey as yours I did it at a steady 65MPH and I am just a tad higher in elevation than you.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 12:49 PM
  #15  
eclipsems's Avatar
eclipsems
Professional
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, Ontario
Default

Also remember a strong tail wind will make a big difference. Our trucks are more suseptable to drag because of the big surface area of our trucks in comparison to a car.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 10:02 PM
  #16  
Medic1's Avatar
Medic1
Professional
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Default

I wish! Highest I have seen mine go so far is 14.9L/100km and thats only been since the weather got nicer. Most of the winter I was sitting around 19-21L/100km.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 07:20 AM
  #17  
TurboGPZ's Avatar
TurboGPZ
Professional
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Quebec, Canada
Default

It seems to be very temperature dependent as my mileage went down with the temperatures in the last couple of days.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 06:56 PM
  #18  
drought_buster's Avatar
drought_buster
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

Is it really that hard to believe that a 2.8L engine can achieve 25MPG?
Yesterdays Photo
Name:  1270768526.jpg
Views: 79
Size:  65.8 KB
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 12:10 AM
  #19  
eclipsems's Avatar
eclipsems
Professional
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, Ontario
Talking

Originally Posted by drought_buster
Is it really that hard to believe that a 2.8L engine can achieve 25MPG?
Yesterdays Photo [/IMG]
Size of the engine is not the deciding factor for fuel economy.

Aerodynamics and weight play a significant factor among others.

For example, my 7.0L motor routinely offers over 28mpg on the highway because it's in a Vette that is basically a wedge and only weigh's 3400lbs with me in it. I'd guarantee it wouldn't even muster 20mph with the same engine in our trucks.
To further the point, ironically the 6.2 motor in a C6 Vette is rated at 16/26 to a Honda S2000 with its 2.2L motor which can't even muster half the power is at 18/25.
On youtube, Jeremy Clarkson proved a BMW M3 with a V8 can get same/better gas mileage in certain situations that of a Prius. Don't believe me, do a search on Youtube for 'm3 prius top gear'.

Contrary to widely held belief, size doesn't matter much at all.
Weight, aerodynamics, engine efficiency and driving style have more to do with mpg than size of the engine.
 

Last edited by eclipsems; Apr 10, 2010 at 12:35 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 01:18 AM
  #20  
706jim's Avatar
706jim
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Default

800hp in the vette? What times will it run?
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.