4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

3:55 vs 3:92

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 11:11 PM
  #1  
Widespread's Avatar
Widespread
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Hill, GA
Default 3:55 vs 3:92

I know the 3.92 is supposed to get less MPG than the 3:55, anyone want to chime in on what real world differences they have seen between the two?
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
jayman84's Avatar
jayman84
Captain
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: middle of the state, IA
Default

depending on if you drive more in town or highway. in town you might get better mpg but it wont be any more than about 1mpg if that with the 3.92. highway varies because of the 4 cyl mode but from what I have gathered you will get around 1 to 2mpg better highway with the 3.55
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 03:32 AM
  #3  
Laramie1997's Avatar
Laramie1997
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 5
From: Springfield MO
Default

There really isn't that much difference. Sure, if you were driving 100% highway miles, then a 3.55:1 ratio will get better mileage, but not a huge difference. Where the 3.92:1 ratio really shines is in city driving. It actually takes less to get the truck moving so it does help on fuel a bit. Main thing you need to concern yourself with is if you need limited slip or not. That should be your deciding factor.

Personally, I've got the 3.92's and I get around 15-16 mixed highway/city driving and about 18.5-20 out on the highway. Considering I live in the hills, I'm happy.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 09:17 AM
  #4  
JoesBrotherRamMan's Avatar
JoesBrotherRamMan
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Default

Laramie: What would you say in parts it would cost be to upgrade of 3.92 front and rear, and LSD in the rear?
Sorry to hijack WIdespread
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
jayman84's Avatar
jayman84
Captain
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: middle of the state, IA
Default

Originally Posted by JoesBrotherRamMan
Laramie: What would you say in parts it would cost be to upgrade of 3.92 front and rear, and LSD in the rear?
Sorry to hijack WIdespread
if you went with mopar parts then you would be looking at about 2200. If you go aftermarket then you could probably get it done for about 1500 roughly.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
JoesBrotherRamMan's Avatar
JoesBrotherRamMan
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jayman84
if you went with mopar parts then you would be looking at about 2200. If you go aftermarket then you could probably get it done for about 1500 roughly.
That's not too bad, on the wish list though.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #7  
NumberCruncher's Avatar
NumberCruncher
Amateur
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

FYI.

My 1998 Ram with the 3.92 turned around 2,000 rpm at 70 mph IIRC. I drove a 2010 in January that had the 3.92. I was reluctant to do so as I wanted better mileage an preferred the 3.55. Well I was surprised to see the tach turning 1,600 rpm at 60mph even with the 3.92. I reminded myself this new truck has a 5 speed automatic not a 4 speed and top gear on this tranny is .67.

I say get the 3.92 for limited slip reasons alone.

NC
 

Last edited by NumberCruncher; Nov 27, 2010 at 10:51 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2010 | 06:44 PM
  #8  
Pedro Dog's Avatar
Pedro Dog
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 5
From: San Pedro, California
Default

deleted
 

Last edited by Pedro Dog; Nov 29, 2010 at 06:59 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2010 | 06:51 PM
  #9  
Laramie1997's Avatar
Laramie1997
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 5
From: Springfield MO
Default



The odometer reading is how many miles that were driven on that fuel up so far.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 09:11 AM
  #10  
kddsRam's Avatar
kddsRam
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: back woods of Chester County PA
Default

I had a 2011 SLT qc as a loaner from dealer last month when I had service and recall work done. It had the 3.55's with the hemi. It only had 2200 miles on it, ahh the new truck smell was nice ! But 0-80mph sprints, you sure can tell the difference from a dead stop off the line with these versus the 3.92.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.