Test Drove a Ram: Uconnect question
#1
Test Drove a Ram: Uconnect question
I just test drove a 2011 Ram and of course the truck was awesome. I asked the sales guy about the U-Connect and if it allowed voice control of an iPod and he said it did not. Normally I know more than the sales guy but he seemed pretty in tune with matters. He stated the U-connect was really about hands free phone use as opposed to voice commands for an iPod like the Ford Sync system allows.
Can anyone confirm if U-Connect allows voice control or not?
Now for those who aren't tired of drive impressions, here are mine. First up the 2011 F-150 with the 5.0 engine.
Before I drove the Ram I test drove a 2011 F-150 with the new 5.0 liter V8. The 6 speed transmission allowed for very strong acceleration but the engine did feel a little soft at the 2,000 rpm range. Once kicked down the truck definitely pulled nicely. The ride was a little stiff but I prefer a stiffer ride to too soft of a ride. The interior was nice and I really liked the 4" LCD display in the center of the dashboard. It had lots of information available and for me bridges the gap between only having six analog gauges of data and a full blown 6" LCD in the center of the dash. I really don't like those. So the F-150 was impressive save for the low end power.
This truck had the 3.55 rear end and if I went Ford I'd go with the 3.73 which arguably would help with acceleration. Also, some have commented that the F-150 throttle response can be tuned up quite a bit which may be what I was feeling more than the lack of torque. The F-150 had a bench seat with the column shifter. Although the steering wheel obscured the buttons, you have up and down shift on the shift lever. It is nice having easy access to a downshift so I can prepare for passing without having to floor the gas pedal to get a downshift.
Bring on the Ram. The truck I drove was close to what I would have purchased. I prefer a bench seat up front and a 3.92 in back but other than those two items, the truck was what I am after. The interior was definitely a notch above the Ford but both trucks are nice. The center display doesn't quite have as much information as the Ford but still has the important data available. I drove a Ram in January of 2010 and that model had the bench seat. For my purposes, the center console with shifter takes up way too much room in a full size truck. The 2011 Ram had buckets and if I buy a Ram, I'l definitely go for the split bench. Also, the 2010 Ram had a similar shift mechanism to the Ford as far as being able to ratchet up or down a gear on the column shifter. The 2011 had the console shifter with the tiptronic mode. I did not take the time to downshift the truck manually as I really didn't have to. I'd say the hemi has quite a bit more torque at the 2,000 - 3,000 rpm range where I do most of my driving. As smooth and nice as the 5.0 was in the Ford, I think the Hemi is quite a bit stronger. The ride is definitely better than the Ford and I found how big the difference was to be quite surprising.
Of course both vehicles are very nice, and they should be as both sticker for 37kish. However at this point I lean towards the Ram for that Hemi engine and "supposed" 22mpg on the highway with the MDS. This sales guy seemed quite sure that was attainable if you aren't a lead foot.
I hope to buy the last week in December and part of what will make up my mind is if either brand has exactly what I want available for a pre-2011 purchase.
NC
Can anyone confirm if U-Connect allows voice control or not?
Now for those who aren't tired of drive impressions, here are mine. First up the 2011 F-150 with the 5.0 engine.
Before I drove the Ram I test drove a 2011 F-150 with the new 5.0 liter V8. The 6 speed transmission allowed for very strong acceleration but the engine did feel a little soft at the 2,000 rpm range. Once kicked down the truck definitely pulled nicely. The ride was a little stiff but I prefer a stiffer ride to too soft of a ride. The interior was nice and I really liked the 4" LCD display in the center of the dashboard. It had lots of information available and for me bridges the gap between only having six analog gauges of data and a full blown 6" LCD in the center of the dash. I really don't like those. So the F-150 was impressive save for the low end power.
This truck had the 3.55 rear end and if I went Ford I'd go with the 3.73 which arguably would help with acceleration. Also, some have commented that the F-150 throttle response can be tuned up quite a bit which may be what I was feeling more than the lack of torque. The F-150 had a bench seat with the column shifter. Although the steering wheel obscured the buttons, you have up and down shift on the shift lever. It is nice having easy access to a downshift so I can prepare for passing without having to floor the gas pedal to get a downshift.
Bring on the Ram. The truck I drove was close to what I would have purchased. I prefer a bench seat up front and a 3.92 in back but other than those two items, the truck was what I am after. The interior was definitely a notch above the Ford but both trucks are nice. The center display doesn't quite have as much information as the Ford but still has the important data available. I drove a Ram in January of 2010 and that model had the bench seat. For my purposes, the center console with shifter takes up way too much room in a full size truck. The 2011 Ram had buckets and if I buy a Ram, I'l definitely go for the split bench. Also, the 2010 Ram had a similar shift mechanism to the Ford as far as being able to ratchet up or down a gear on the column shifter. The 2011 had the console shifter with the tiptronic mode. I did not take the time to downshift the truck manually as I really didn't have to. I'd say the hemi has quite a bit more torque at the 2,000 - 3,000 rpm range where I do most of my driving. As smooth and nice as the 5.0 was in the Ford, I think the Hemi is quite a bit stronger. The ride is definitely better than the Ford and I found how big the difference was to be quite surprising.
Of course both vehicles are very nice, and they should be as both sticker for 37kish. However at this point I lean towards the Ram for that Hemi engine and "supposed" 22mpg on the highway with the MDS. This sales guy seemed quite sure that was attainable if you aren't a lead foot.
I hope to buy the last week in December and part of what will make up my mind is if either brand has exactly what I want available for a pre-2011 purchase.
NC
Last edited by NumberCruncher; 12-18-2010 at 10:31 PM.
#2
#3
#4
Yes 22 is a little on the high side there. I saw my truck hit 20... Once! It was when I drove it off the lot and hit the highway on my 600 mile drive home. 17-18 is much more realistic.
#5
#7
U-connect is for the hands free phone. If you have a Bluetooth phone, it will pick up the U connect. The mic is in the rearview mirror. It works pretty well so far. It does not let you change radio stations via voice however.....
There is something else called "voice command" - maybe that is what he is referring to regarding the changing of the radio stations.
There is something else called "voice command" - maybe that is what he is referring to regarding the changing of the radio stations.
Last edited by TRXHemi; 12-19-2010 at 12:39 AM.
Trending Topics
#9
I won't bet on it.
NC