Audio/Visual Electronics Wired up? Everyone's got some sort of electrical modification. Let's hear about it here.

Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #1  
Leonard's Avatar
Leonard
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From:
Default Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?


Getting the aftermarket urge/ was checking crutchfield.com,
I was comparing Kenwood, Pioneer, Alpine, Blaupunkt, Panasonic, and Sony.

From the charts I was strayed from my usual choice of Kenwood to the Blaupunkt and even more so to the Sony.

Any durability/reliability info would be appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #2  
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT
The Forum Tyrant
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 27,728
Likes: 3
From: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

ive only ever had MTX subs...im currently running dual 12s, with a 3000w competition amp...they handle it very nicely, and it BOOMS...theya re also easily tunable to your type of music...
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #3  
techmanbd's Avatar
techmanbd
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

I had a Kenwood and liked it alot, easy to do the setups and great sound. Then it got stolen and they put an alpine in its place. I miss the Kenwood.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #4  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

When it comes to head units and quality, you cannot beat Alpine. They are fairly expensive but it's for a reason and seldom do they use up their space for things like pretty pictures, they leave that up to other companies like Pioneer. Pioneer is my second choice and I do like their screen with the video like images, but Alpine is far better and uses all the space available for better sound and imaging. I've had and heard many different kinds, but I have and will always stick with my Alpines.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #5  
vlsun's Avatar
vlsun
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: south portland, me
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

i'm a huge audio quality buff but the high end brands are too expensive so i opted for jl audio speakers and precision power (ppi) amp. however i did get the original head unit i wanted which is nakamichi cd-400 (best sounding one i've auditioned). if you want to stay realistically on the budget, go for alpine head unit, kicker amp and boston acoustic speakers
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 01:25 AM
  #6  
lonasindi's Avatar
lonasindi
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

mmm... when I was shopping for a new head unit, I was looking at the sony mx 880 or whatever, the one that's all black and no buttons on the outside. I instead chose my JVC... lemme check the model number, found it. KD-LHX500. It's pretty spiffy, it's a touch screen, so the only external controls are volume, power, screen angle, eject and menu. Everything else is on the touch screen. Sound is good, no problems except it needed reset once after the install because it 'stuck' open. Navigation is easy, the remote is small and easy to use. MP3 support is tops. and the silver really contrasts nicely with my dark gray interior. Overall, it was worth the cash.

 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 06:34 AM
  #7  
CLIMAXVA's Avatar
CLIMAXVA
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

I will have to agree with some of these guys. If you want a good head unit go for the Alpine, it is one of the best as far as sound quality and being able to control your speakers (i mean as far as power, bass, treble, things of that nature). For subs go with the JLs get subs don't go buying MTX they have been sold out or Sony Xplods there not worth the money. If you want to spend the money on subs buy Elispses VERY GOOD. As far as the amp goes I would spend the money on Pheonix Gold one of the best amps in the league.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
lonasindi's Avatar
lonasindi
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

it's my undestanding that the XPLOD line, ironically, has a tendency to catch fire.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 08:35 PM
  #9  
P.B.'s Avatar
P.B.
Rookie
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

I'VE HEARD THEM ALL. MY PREFERENCE IS AUDIOBAHN OR MEMPHIS. ALPINE & PIONEER HAVE THE MOST FLEXIBLE AND VERSATILE HEAD UNITS, I THINK. THE CHEAPEST PLACE I HAVE FOUND TO BUY STEREO ELECTRONICS IS www.sonicelectronix.com I'V DONE A LOT OF BUISNESS WITH THEM. NO COMPLAINTS WHAT SO EVER. YOUR SUBS ARE ONLY AS GOOD AS THE AMP YOU HAVE CATCHING THEM ON FIRE.[sm=badbadbad.gif] ANY QUESTION AS FAR AS INSTALLATION JUST ASK.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 09:42 PM
  #10  
ngsm13's Avatar
ngsm13
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default RE: Aftermarket stereo preference and reliability/durability?

Only things I'll touch as far as

HU: Alpine, Eclipse, Clarion, Pioneer, Panasonic

If you want an insight on good brands check out a list that was tabulated by an solely audio forum, i agree with most of it:
http://myweb.cableone.net/grogers/abr.html

Peace

NG
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.