Brand News, Concepts & Rumors Have you heard? Have you seen? No? Come on in, read and discuss the latest from Dodge. (This is not a tech section.)

Wrangler pickup spotted!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2007 | 05:29 PM
  #11  
grungerockjeeper's Avatar
grungerockjeeper
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default RE: Wrangler pickup spotted!

Im all for factory v-8 and 35's. Why, when people customize anyway? Bragging rights. Something to the effect of 'Who else is badass enough to build an open top 2-door with an available hemi and 35" tires? No one!' The reason people go out and modify their trucks this way is because thats what they wanted in the first place. Buying it already set up would save me the trouble. And make all those hummers look just plain lame.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 02:14 AM
  #12  
ViperGTS's Avatar
ViperGTS
Banned
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,467
Likes: 0
From: There
Default RE: Wrangler pickup spotted!

Does the Wrangler have a diesel option yet? That would be a good start besides a truck model.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 05:32 PM
  #13  
grungerockjeeper's Avatar
grungerockjeeper
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default RE: Wrangler pickup spotted!

Not here in the states. To me its just plain idiotic not tooffer that 5 cyl diesel in the sprinter. That van gets near 30mpg and has more power than that crappy v-6 the JK has now. And not offering a v-8 of some kind is double idiotic. With all the conversion kits out there to swap v-8s of every kind into a wrangler you'd think someone would take notice. Even the 4.7 would make a world of difference. Between those 2 options as well a pickup spinoff, Jeep cant lose.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #14  
KRZY.BMET's Avatar
KRZY.BMET
Peaceful Browser
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,960
Likes: 1
From: Miramar, Florida
Default RE: Wrangler pickup spotted!

I like it. Looks like a great camping vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 01:59 AM
  #15  
ViperGTS's Avatar
ViperGTS
Banned
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,467
Likes: 0
From: There
Default RE: Wrangler pickup spotted!

4.7 would make a world of difference.
Use the same V8 as the Dakota is a win win situation. If they can offer the Dak V8 for nearly 20k, it shouldn't cost much to put it in the Wrangler
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #16  
grungerockjeeper's Avatar
grungerockjeeper
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default RE: Wrangler pickup spotted!

ORIGINAL: ViperGTS

4.7 would make a world of difference.
Use the same V8 as the Dakota is a win win situation. If they can offer the Dak V8 for nearly 20k, it shouldn't cost much to put it in the Wrangler
Exactly. A hemi would be better, but the flex fuel 4.7 still has over 300 hp, and would keep the dead weight on the front axle fairly reasonable. I cant see it hurting the mpg any, since a wrangler with any 6 cyl is totally underpowered. Having this kind of power to shove something with cinderblock aerodynamics down the road at 70 mph shouldnt cost much mpg if any. I had a '95YJ with the 2.5 4 cyl and 31's and now have a '00 TJ with 33's. My mpg is about the same between the two:16-17 on the highway either way.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.