More 2006 Charger NEWS!!!
#11
#14
RE: More 2006 Charger NEWS!!!
If you check out my sig, you'll see that I am well versed in the FWD 4 banger turbos including the Shelby's. And yes I do know that the Shelby Z's are not full Shelby's, they simply use some Shelby components. I know all about the Super 60 set up and had wanted it for quite a while, but it was too expensive. The good part was that it was based on the '88s wiring and electronics, but I no longer have my '88 Shelby Z. I was just making the point that even though the Charger was brought back with such drastic changes from it's roots, that it still came with only 2 doors. BTW if I put the same amount of money in my Roadrunner that the Super 60 costs, the Super 60 equipped car still doesn't stand a chance.[sm=smiley2.gif]
#15
RE: More 2006 Charger NEWS!!!
Well,
I would prefer the Charger to have 2 doors as well. However, I would take a great looking four door Charger with a Hemi and RWD. Hopefully, if the GTO sells, Chrylser will produce a coupe version.
As for your Roadrunner, I would prefer your car with the 440 over any of the four cylinder renditions....as a Sunday driver though...not a daily driver. I just wanted to stick up for the Shelby Turbos because they were able to go very fast for very little money and they were still pretty good on gas.
I would prefer the Charger to have 2 doors as well. However, I would take a great looking four door Charger with a Hemi and RWD. Hopefully, if the GTO sells, Chrylser will produce a coupe version.
As for your Roadrunner, I would prefer your car with the 440 over any of the four cylinder renditions....as a Sunday driver though...not a daily driver. I just wanted to stick up for the Shelby Turbos because they were able to go very fast for very little money and they were still pretty good on gas.