Dodge Challenger Forum for the 2008+ Challenger. This includes the SE, SXT, R/T, Shaker, Scat Pack, SRT and Hellcat models.

New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #1  
Durango911's Avatar
Durango911
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From:
Default New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

I was just curious to what everyone thought of the new challenger vs the new camaro?!

I hate to say it but the challenger has more power and torque but I can almost gurantee the camaro will weigh less and outperform it. It kind of reminds me of the new (ugly) GTO vs the new Charger. Hopefully the challenger smokes it! Anyone hear of the price ranges? $22-26,000 V6 $30-35,000 5.7 38-42,000 6.1? I'm guessing the 400hp Camaro will be around $35,000. I heard they were going to have a 505hp LS7 camaro but it sounds too expensive. And I keep hearing about a 6.4 hemi! That'd be BADA$$!
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
03neonRT's Avatar
03neonRT
Grand Champion
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

I think theres too much speculation and rumor at this point about both cars to really make an educated comparison.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #3  
deranged's Avatar
deranged
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 1
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

Do you want to be seen in an UGLY car (Camaro) or a piece of art. You decide. Oh andI guartantee there will be a Challenger that out performs the Camaro.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #4  
Durango911's Avatar
Durango911
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

I hope you're right. I don't think the challenger will have any problems as long as dodge doesn't make it weigh too much. Hopefully the public can buy a Challenger next year. My dealership told me the only way to get one was ebay or if your a GM executive...who knows. I thinkthere aretoo many rumors.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 10:52 AM
  #5  
DevilsReject's Avatar
DevilsReject
Noob Assassin
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

The Camaro will own the Challenger quite nicely.....at least at the high end model......

That being said, I think the numbers between the two for the most part will be fairly comparable. Both are going to be on the heavy side, north of 3700lbs.....both will have proven V8 motors.....both will have in excess of 400hp in the high end models.

Ultimately though, the high end Camaro will simply have more power due to the powerplant it will share with the new Corvette and Cadillac CTS-V. While it may not be in the first run of vehicles, I fully expect the 600hp version of the new Corvette motor to be dropped into a Z-28 Camaro....at worst we'll see an LS7 - 500hp motor in the Z-28.

Looking at it though, I dont see why they'd drop a 600hp motor into a 4dr sedan Cadillac and leave it out of the Camaro.....so we'll see..
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #6  
97 3.5 Intrepid's Avatar
97 3.5 Intrepid
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 2
From:
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

ORIGINAL: DevilsReject

The Camaro will own the Challenger quite nicely.....at least at the high end model......

That being said, I think the numbers between the two for the most part will be fairly comparable. Both are going to be on the heavy side, north of 3700lbs.....both will have proven V8 motors.....both will have in excess of 400hp in the high end models.

Ultimately though, the high end Camaro will simply have more power due to the powerplant it will share with the new Corvette and Cadillac CTS-V. While it may not be in the first run of vehicles, I fully expect the 600hp version of the new Corvette motor to be dropped into a Z-28 Camaro....at worst we'll see an LS7 - 500hp motor in the Z-28.

Looking at it though, I dont see why they'd drop a 600hp motor into a 4dr sedan Cadillac and leave it out of the Camaro.....so we'll see..
I doubt that they will offer a 600hp engine in the Camaro let alone as the Z-28 model. If they do it will be an extremely low production model. If they do that it will hurt the sales of the Z06. The LS7 is a possibility, but there is a possibility that the Challenger might have an ace up their sleave based on what some rumors I have heard. I think we arejust going to have to wait and see.

Regardless if the Camaro is slightly faster and cheaper, I hate the looks of theCamaro andhave absolutely no attraction to that car, beyond the fact that I don't like Chevrolet models.You'll findme in an 05-06 GTO before you'll find me in the new Camaro.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:08 AM
  #7  
DevilsReject's Avatar
DevilsReject
Noob Assassin
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

ORIGINAL: 97 3.5 Intrepid

I doubt that they will offer a 600hp engine in the Camaro let alone as the Z-28 model. If they do it will be an extremely low production model. If they do that it will hurt the sales of the Z06. The LS7 is a possibility, but there is a possibility that the Challenger might have an ace up their sleave based on what some rumors I have heard. I think we arejust going to have to wait and see.

Regardless if the Camaro is slightly faster and cheaper, I hate the looks of theCamaro andhave absolutely no attraction to that car, beyond the fact that I don't like Chevrolet models.You'll findme in an 05-06 GTO before you'll find me in the new Camaro.
The new LS3 motor for the Corvette is a 430hp/424ftlbs of torque, expect that to be the base V8 in the Camaro..

The 600hp motor is the Non-Aspirated motor from the new Blue Devil/ZR-1 Corvette, and its going into the CTS-V Cadillac. The V-Series Cadillac's are limited run cars, similar to the SRT lineup for Dodge/Chrysler. I expect the Z-28 to be a limited run, as the SS will be the equivalent of Dodge's R/T model....The LS7 is no longer the king in the LS series motors......as it is will be replaced soon enough....

 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #8  
97 3.5 Intrepid's Avatar
97 3.5 Intrepid
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 2
From:
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

ORIGINAL: DevilsReject

The new LS3 motor for the Corvette is a 430hp/424ftlbs of torque, expect that to be the base V8 in the Camaro..

The 600hp motor is the Non-Aspirated motor from the new Blue Devil/ZR-1 Corvette, and its going into the CTS-V Cadillac. The V-Series Cadillac's are limited run cars, similar to the SRT lineup for Dodge/Chrysler. I expect the Z-28 to be a limited run, as the SS will be the equivalent of Dodge's R/T model....The LS7 is no longer the king in the LS series motors......as it is will be replaced soon enough....

I don't think that giving the Camaro the LS3 would be a very wise move for their base level V8. Last time GM tried that, it cannabalized the sales of the Corvette. I'm expecting the LS2 to be the base level V8 at this point, maybe even the Active Fuel Management version. They don't want to completely over shoot themselves on the first level V8 or else it could turn away some customers because of insurance issues, which I hear was possibly a factor on what caused the previous Camaro to fail.

From what I understand the Blue Devil/ZR-1 is going to be a limited production run, why would GM want to offer the same engine in both cars. It could take away from the Corvette again in popularity.

Why exactly do you think the Z-28 will be the top level, limited production run when in the more recent history at least the SS was the limited production run for the Camaro and the Z-28 was the higher volume, slightly lower performance model?

I have my doubts that they will want to offer the exact same engine line, just adjusting the numbers and offering a base V6 to separate the Corvette and Camaro.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #9  
DevilsReject's Avatar
DevilsReject
Noob Assassin
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

ORIGINAL: 97 3.5 Intrepid

I don't think that giving the Camaro the LS3 would be a very wise move for their base level V8. Last time GM tried that, it cannabalized the sales of the Corvette. I'm expecting the LS2 to be the base level V8 at this point, maybe even the Active Fuel Management version. They don't want to completely over shoot themselves on the first level V8 or else it could turn away some customers because of insurance issues, which I hear was possibly a factor on what caused the previous Camaro to fail.
The LS2 was discontinued in the Corvette. It was replaced by the LS3. Chevy has to compete with the Challenger and Mustang...and so they have to put a quality motor into the lineup. The LS3 is already scheduled to be used in the Camaro. Plus, since the new Pontiac G8 will be using an LS2 motor for its first year, I expect it to be replaced for the LS3, just like they did with the LT1/LS1 Camaros and the LS1/LS2 GTO's. The 2004 GTO was an LS1, and the very next year it was an LS2.

Also, the LS4 will most likely be the base V8 for the Camaro anyhow. It's currently used in about 8 different cars for GM. The only drawback is its currently configured for FWD, although I'm sure GM has already fixed that. Consider, LS4 = 303hp & the LS3 = 430hp.....enough to compete with both the Challenger and the Mustang. I'll exclude the GT500 as its a supercharged limited run.

Lastly, the LS3 is the last of the GenIV motors. GM has already stated that they will be replacing these motors with a new Gen V OHV setup with direct injection. These are due out in 2010. Not to mention, these motors are seeing upwards of 450hp and are E85 compatiable. Oh, and you were right, they will include the Active Fuel Management....Here's an article from WardsAuto.com about it....

GM Reveals Small-Block V-8 with Direct Injection - wardsauto.com
By Mike Sutton
Aug. 29, 2007
MILFORD, MI – Although General Motors Corp. is dividing its resources to cover all fronts of advanced powertrain development, the future of the auto maker’s foundation OHV small-block V-8 architecture appears secure with the advent of direct-injection gasoline (DIG) technology.

Among the various exhibits of engineering bravado on display at the auto maker’s proving grounds here, including two-mode hybrid-electric drivetrains, ultra-clean turbodiesels and homogeneous charge compression ignition flex-fuel engines, a seemingly untouched Cadillac Escalade stands out.

Emblazoned with giant E85 banners down its flanks, there is little to indicate the industry’s first OHV V-8 with DIG fueling lurks beneath the SUV’s pearl white hood.

The experimental engine is based on GM’s current all-aluminum Gen IV 6.2L V-8 (L92) found in the Escalade, GMC Yukon Denali and Hummer H2. Depending on the application, the powerplant, which sports port fuel injection, variable valve timing (VVT) and dual-cam phasing, is rated between 380-403 hp in stock form.

However, with a little tweaking to accommodate the auto industry’s latest fuel-injection hardware, the prototype V-8 is producing “well north of 450 hp (on gasoline),†says Dave Sczomak, development engineer-GM Powertrain Advanced Engineering.
Running the engine on E85 ethanol allows for even more power to be coaxed from the big V-8, he adds, noting the 85%/15% ethanol/gasoline mix generally carries a race fuel-like 106 octane rating.

Cruising the web of test roads onsite, the Escalade motors along smoothly with a characteristic large-displacement V-8 burble. However, mashing the gas from a standstill produces a wave of power that propels the big truck at a noticeably more rapid pace than the production version.

Along with the substantial increase in horsepower, DIG also contributes to about a 10% increase in low-end torque, Sczomak says. In addition, fuel economy is moderately improved (3-6%), as are cold-start emissions of hydrocarbons.

To accommodate the DIG fueling system, GM redesigned the L92 cylinder heads, rearranging the intake ports to make room for the eight high-pressure injectors that squirt fuel directly into the side of the combustion chamber at 2,250 psi (155 bar).
New dished pistons – similar to a diesel’s – were installed for added clearance of the injectors. They also contribute to a greater compression ratio (11.5:1 vs. 10.5:1), which can be employed because of the high-octane composition of E85 and the knock-reducing cooling effect of introducing fuel directly into the cylinder.

A modified engine controller manages the engine’s operation, while VVT and Active Fuel Management cylinder deactivation contribute to efficiency and refinement.

The development sounds like a no-brainer for improving nearly every aspect of the near-60-year-old small block’s performance.
However, Tom Stephens, group vice president-GM Powertrain and Quality, notes introducing a production DIG small block would “require the next-generation architecture†of the engine, or Gen V.

This primarily is due to the huge volumes of V-8 engines GM produces, Sczomak says, noting a radical change in cylinder-head design, for example, becomes a monumental undertaking when taking into account GM’s annual build of more than 1 million small block V-8s.

Fortunately, timing is on the auto maker’s side. The recent introduction of the ’08 Corvette’s 430-hp LS3 V-8, along with the release later this year of the ’08 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid’s 6.0L V-8, represent the last editions of the Gen IV engine family, Stephens says.

All subsequent introductions will be of the Gen V architecture and could have DIG fueling integrated from the ground up, especially considering the refinement of the current test engine’s operation. The greater specific output provided by DIG also would allow for greater engine downsizing, thereby improving fuel economy even further.

“GM would want to introduce this (DIG) on a high-profile vehicle, such as the new (Chevrolet) Camaro or (rear-wheel-drive) Impala,†Global Insight analyst John Wolkonowicz says, referring to the auto maker’s plans for new volume models based on its global RWD platform developed by GM Holden Ltd. in Australia.

The new Camaro, which originally was shown at the 2005 North American International Auto Show in Detroit, is expected to appear later next year as an ’09 model, with the all-new RWD Impala taking form sometime early in the next decade. Revisions for future generations of the Corvette and Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra pickups are expected in the same timeframe, Wolkonowicz says.

By capitalizing on areas of significant improvement that remain untapped in its core engine lineup, while simultaneously amping up the arrival of its new hybrid-electric vehicles, clean diesels and hydrogen fuel cells, GM clearly is betting on an ever-fracturing market for advanced powertrains.

As a result, the iconic grumble of the small-block V-8 appears poised to remain a fixture of the automotive landscape for the foreseeable future.
ORIGINAL: 97 3.5 Intrepid
From what I understand the Blue Devil/ZR-1 is going to be a limited production run, why would GM want to offer the same engine in both cars. It could take away from the Corvette again in popularity. Why exactly do you think the Z-28 will be the top level, limited production run when in the more recent history at least the SS was the limited production run for the Camaro and the Z-28 was the higher volume, slightly lower performance model?
The Z line of cars, for the most part, with the exception of the final few years of the Camaro.....have typically been the high end model of any car it was placed on. The Z24 Cavalier, Z26 Beretta, Z28 Camaro, and the Z34 Lumina/Monte Carlo. The last few years of the Camaro however, saw the Z become average.The SS line went thru this for a while as well, as Chevy thru the SS logo on just about anything despite them not being SS models.

The Z28's have typically always been the high end Camaro. When the Camaro first debuted, the SS models did in fact have larger engines, but the Z28 had an underrated motor in it capable of 400hp stock. Actual numbers on it are between 340-400hp. Let's also not forget the IROC-Z model Z28's from the 80's either. The SS models didnt really outpace the Z28's until roughly the mid to late90's.....due in large part to the rebirth of the whole "SS" moniker with Chevy. If you remember, they were putting out the SS Impala & the Chevy SS 454 pickups....and you had the Monte Carlo SS as well.

Every car out there is either an R/T or an SS.....I think everyone else would like to drive something a bit more "exclusive". Also, the fact that there wont be a Firebird/Trans-Am model of this car, at least, initially, leads me to believe that there wont be a bunch of different versions. The SS & RS models were not always offered on the Camaro, but the Z28 option has been available every year.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2007 | 01:31 AM
  #10  
97 3.5 Intrepid's Avatar
97 3.5 Intrepid
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 2
From:
Default RE: New Challenger Vs. New Camaro

Man, I've got a headache with all that info. Anyways, thank you for the information, its very interesting. You're saying that the LS2 will completely be dropped, are you sure that the L76 will be dropped as well (G8 version with Active Fuel Management) after the first year run? Sounds like a waste of time and technology. I know they used this in the Holden model since 06, but I believe they are planning on using one of these two versionsin a Saab model yet.

I admit that I don't know GM engines quite as well as you do, but I don't think they have an Active Fuel Management version of the LS3...yet. I doubt they would drop the L76 and replace it in the G8 with an engine without Active Fuel Management as they would lose an advantage in fuel economy. The reason why I ask this is I have a feeling that they will share some of the same powertrains due to being platform mates. I could be wrong about this but don't see them using the LS4 on the Camaro unless they are planning on upping the power. The 303hp & 323ft-lbs of tq is a very slight advantage over the Mustang's 300hp & 315ft-lbs of tq, even though the fuel economy will be significantly better for theCamaro. If there were to use this engine they would have to use a badge such as the RS because this would be a step down for either the Z-28 or SS badge with their previous output being above this, not to mention thedrop indisplacement would hurt the image as well.

I did a little research and it appears you are correct that they will feature the LS3 according to some sources. All the reviews I read about the concept mentioned the LS2.If I were in chargeI would use the L76 for the RS model, the LS3 for the Z-28, and the LS7 for the SS. This would provide a fuel efficient choice that would competedirectly against the 5.7L Hemi if the Challenger uses it. TheLS3 would be a step upagainst the 6.1L by supposively producing more power and possibly being more consistent with the VVT system and would fit with the original position of the Z-28 (higher output on a smaller engine). The LS7 would probably be able to trounce the GT500 considering that it will probably produce more consistent power than theGT500, it could probably defeat it.

I don'tthinkthe example of the GTO notcannabalizingsales awayfrom the Vette is the best example. The GTO was a model that completely failed and didn't sell worth a darn. Not to mention thathappened in a different division and the prices were not that different at the beginning (granted they adjusted the prices later but it was pretty much sunkat that point).I image thatthe Camaro will be a lot cheaper than theVette with thatengine. The bestmove would be toget the Vette readyfor another engine upgrade onboth levels to keep them from hurting each other.

The Challenger on the other hand won't be as easy to capture as one might think. Many rumors hold that the Hemis might be receiving an update before long. On top of this, there is a rumored engine that might be more technologically advanced being offered in the Challenger. I will discuss this more atour other forum very soon and repost it here.

The next generation small blocks sound impressive. I like the sound of the higher compression ratio combined with the E-85 in the alternative fuel/increasing performance category. I am concerned though that this could cause reliability problems with a compression ratio this high. The GDI sounds excellent as well.

As for the Z28 vs. SS. Yes I remember those Z-line models. The Z28 was consistent in the Camaro's history; however, the SS models (when they were offered) from what I understand were still the superior models. Although you are right that the SS badge has become watered down as the R/T has been, one could also argue the same for the Z-name plate as some of those other models (such as the Z24) were nothing special. I would have to vote for the historical accurarcy.

Alright that's it for now. I look forward to your response as it is fun talking to someone who gets into this as much as I do.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.